Suppr超能文献

多药耐药菌定植对实体器官移植受者移植物存活、感染风险和死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The impact of colonization by multidrug resistant bacteria on graft survival, risk of infection, and mortality in recipients of solid organ transplant: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medicine, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Oct;30(10):1228-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.036. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Global increase in colonization by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria poses a significant concern. The precise impact of MDR colonization in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) remains not well established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of MDR colonization on SOTR's mortality, infection, or graft loss.

METHODS AND DATA SOURCES

Data from PROSPERO, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, Wiley Cochrane Library, ProQuest Dissertations, Theses Global, and SCOPUS were systematically reviewed, spanning from inception until 20 March 2023. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022290011) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Cohorts and case-control studies that reported on adult SOTR colonized by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. (CRE), or MDR-pseudomonas, and compared to noncolonized, were included. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, conducted a risk of bias evaluation using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and rated certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

We employed RevMan for a meta-analysis, using random-effects models to compute pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was determined using the I statistic.

RESULTS

15,202 SOTR (33 cohort, six case-control studies) were included, where liver transplant and VRE colonization (25 and 14 studies) were predominant. MDR colonization significantly increased posttransplant 1-year mortality (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.63-3.38) and mixed infections (OR, 10.74; 95% CI, 7.56-12.26) across transplant types (p < 0.001 and I = 58%), but no detected impact on graft loss (p 0.41, I = 0). Subgroup analysis indicated a higher association between CRE or ESBL colonization with outcomes (CRE: death OR, 3.94; mixed infections OR, 24.8; ESBL: mixed infections OR, 10.3; no mortality data) compared to MRSA (Death: OR, 2.25; mixed infection: OR, 7.75) or VRE colonization (Death: p 0.20, mixed infections: OR, 5.71).

CONCLUSIONS

MDR colonization in SOTR, particularly CRE, is associated with increased mortality. Despite the low certainty of the evidence, actions to prevent MDR colonization in transplant candidates are warranted.

摘要

背景

全球耐多药(MDR)细菌定植的增加引起了极大关注。MDR 定植对实体器官移植受者(SOTR)的影响尚不清楚。

目的

评估 MDR 定植对 SOTR 死亡率、感染或移植物丢失的影响。

方法和数据来源

从 PROSPERO、OVID Medline、OVID EMBASE、Wiley Cochrane Library、ProQuest Dissertations、Theses Global 和 SCOPUS 系统地检索数据,时间跨度为从成立到 2023 年 3 月 20 日。研究方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42022290011)中进行了注册,并遵循 PRISMA 指南。研究入选标准、参与者、干预措施和偏倚风险评估:纳入了报告成人 SOTR 定植耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)、产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)或碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)或多药耐药铜绿假单胞菌,以及与非定植患者相比的队列和病例对照研究。两名审查员评估了合格性,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行了偏倚风险评估,并使用 GRADE 方法评估了证据的确定性。

数据综合方法

我们使用 RevMan 进行荟萃分析,使用随机效应模型计算合并的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 I 统计量确定统计异质性。

结果

纳入了 15202 名 SOTR(33 项队列研究,6 项病例对照研究),其中肝移植和 VRE 定植(25 项和 14 项研究)占主导地位。MDR 定植显著增加了移植后 1 年的死亡率(OR,2.35;95%CI,1.63-3.38)和混合感染(OR,10.74;95%CI,7.56-12.26),在所有移植类型中(p<0.001,I=58%),但未检测到对移植物丢失的影响(p0.41,I=0)。亚组分析表明,与 MRSA 或 VRE 定植相比,CRE 或 ESBL 定植与结局的相关性更高(CRE:死亡率 OR,3.94;混合感染 OR,24.8;ESBL:混合感染 OR,10.3;无死亡率数据)(p<0.001,I=58%),而与 MRSA 或 VRE 定植相比,CRE 或 ESBL 定植与结局的相关性更高(CRE:死亡率 OR,3.94;混合感染 OR,24.8;ESBL:混合感染 OR,10.3;无死亡率数据)(p<0.001,I=58%)。

结论

MDR 定植在 SOTR 中,特别是 CRE,与死亡率增加有关。尽管证据的确定性较低,但有必要采取行动预防移植候选者的 MDR 定植。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验