• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内影像学指导下的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Center, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Dec;77(12):995-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2024.03.009
PMID:38609042
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There are no clinical data on the efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock. The current study sought to evaluate the impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

Among a total of 28 732 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH (November, 2011 to December, 2015) and KAMIR-V (January, 2016 to June, 2020), we selected a total of 1833 patients (6.4%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI of the culprit vessel. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Among the study population, 375 patients (20.5%) underwent intravascular imaging-guided PCI and 1458 patients (79.5%) underwent angiography-guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE than angiography-guided PCI (19.5% vs 28.2%; HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.45-0.77; P<.001), mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death (13.7% vs 24.0%; adjusted HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.72; P<.001). These results were consistent in propensity score matching (HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.46-0.99), inverse probability weighting (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.45-0.83), and Bayesian analysis (Odds ratio, 0.66, 95% credible interval, 0.49-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

In AMI patients with cardiogenic shock, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE at 1-year than angiography-guided PCI, mainly driven by the lower risk of cardiac death.

摘要

引言和目的

目前尚无血管内影像学指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与血管造影指导的 PCI 在急性心肌梗死(AMI)伴心源性休克患者中的疗效的临床数据。本研究旨在评估血管内影像学指导的 PCI 对 AMI 伴心源性休克患者的影响。

方法

在全国性 KAMIR-NIH(2011 年 11 月至 2015 年 12 月)和 KAMIR-V(2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月)登记研究中,共纳入 28732 例患者,我们从中选择了 1833 例(6.4%)接受罪犯血管 PCI 的 AMI 伴心源性休克患者。主要终点是 1 年时的主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括心源性死亡、心肌梗死、再次血运重建和明确或可能的支架血栓形成。

结果

在研究人群中,375 例(20.5%)患者接受血管内影像学指导的 PCI,1458 例(79.5%)患者接受血管造影指导的 PCI。与血管造影指导的 PCI 相比,血管内影像学指导的 PCI 1 年 MACE 风险显著降低(19.5% vs. 28.2%;HR,0.59;95%CI,0.45-0.77;P<.001),主要归因于心源性死亡风险降低(13.7% vs. 24.0%;调整后的 HR,0.53;95%CI,0.39-0.72;P<.001)。在倾向评分匹配(HR,0.68;95%CI,0.46-0.99)、逆概率加权(HR,0.61;95%CI,0.45-0.83)和贝叶斯分析(OR,0.66,95%可信区间,0.49-0.88)中也观察到了一致的结果。

结论

在 AMI 伴心源性休克患者中,与血管造影指导的 PCI 相比,血管内影像学指导的 PCI 1 年时的 MACE 风险较低,主要归因于心源性死亡风险降低。

相似文献

1
Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.血管内影像学指导下的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Dec;77(12):995-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
2
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: revascularization strategy according to ischemic territory.并发急性心肌梗死和多支血管病变的心源性休克:根据缺血区域的血运重建策略
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2025 Jan;78(2):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死患者的比较。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Aug;77(8):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.11.014. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
4
Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.血管内超声引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 1;14(1):10028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59723-y.
5
Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 27;71(8):844-856. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.028.
6
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
7
Impact of intravascular ultrasound in acute myocardial infarction patients at high ischemic risk.血管内超声对高缺血风险急性心肌梗死患者的影响。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023 Aug;76(8):589-599. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
8
Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴心原性休克患者行多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与梗死相关动脉血运重建的长期临床结局比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e013870. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013870. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
9
Angiography-guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Ischemia-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy in the Management of Significant Disease in Non-Infarct-related Arteries in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease.在多支冠状动脉疾病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,非梗死相关动脉严重病变管理中血管造影引导下多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与缺血引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗及药物治疗的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Jun;17(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000144.
10
Intravascular modality-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.血管内模态引导与血管造影引导的急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 1;95(4):696-703. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28359. Epub 2019 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Internet plus continuing nursing under dual heart medical model after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双心医学模式下“互联网 +”延续性护理的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 13;104(24):e42778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042778.