Pouyanne Alienor, Boudache Sonia, Hilloulin Benoît, Loukili Ahmed, Roziere Emmanuel
Nantes Université, Ecole Centrale Nantes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Civil Engineering and Mechanics Research Institute (GeM), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 6183, 44000 Nantes, France.
Edycem, Parc d'Activité Vendée Sud Loire, Rue du Fléchet, 85600 Montaigu, France.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;17(7):1548. doi: 10.3390/ma17071548.
The common phenomenon observed for concrete in aggressive water is leaching, which involves the dissolution of cement hydration products. Many studies have focused on leaching in demineralised water or acid attacks, but mineral water still deserves further investigation. In most standards, the aggressiveness of a given water body is determined by its pH and not its composition. The effect of the calcium content of the water on degradation is yet to be determined. In this paper, the leaching of Portland cement-based mortar was induced by two types of drinking water with different calcium contents and buffer capacity in controlled conditions. The Langelier saturation index (LSI) was used to describe water aggressiveness based on the calco-carbonic equilibrium. The studied waters had the same pH but LSIs of +0.5 and -1.0 corresponding to scaling with respect to aggressive water; demineralised water was used as a reference. Microstructural damage was checked by TGA and X-ray microtomography. Macroscopic measurements were used to monitor global degradation. The soft water caused a 53% deeper deterioration of the mortar sample than the hard water. Soft water-induced leaching was found to be similar yet slower to leaching via demineralised water (with a mass loss of -2.01% and -2.16% after 200 days, respectively). In contrast, hard water induced strongly time-dependent leaching, and the damage was located close to the surface. The roughness of leached specimens was 18% higher in hard water than in soft water. The formation of calcite on the sample surface not only affects the leaching rate by creating a protective surface layer, but it could also act as a calcium ion pump.
在侵蚀性水中观察到的混凝土常见现象是浸出,这涉及水泥水化产物的溶解。许多研究都集中在去离子水或酸侵蚀中的浸出,但矿泉水仍值得进一步研究。在大多数标准中,给定水体的侵蚀性是由其pH值而非成分决定的。水的钙含量对降解的影响尚待确定。本文在可控条件下,用两种钙含量和缓冲能力不同的饮用水诱导波特兰水泥基砂浆的浸出。基于钙碳平衡,使用朗格利尔饱和指数(LSI)来描述水的侵蚀性。所研究的水具有相同的pH值,但LSI分别为+0.5和-1.0,对应于相对于侵蚀性水的结垢;去离子水用作参考。通过热重分析(TGA)和X射线显微断层扫描检查微观结构损伤。使用宏观测量来监测整体降解。软水使砂浆样品的劣化程度比硬水深53%。发现软水引起的浸出与通过去离子水浸出相似,但速度较慢(200天后质量损失分别为-2.01%和-2.16%)。相比之下,硬水引起强烈的时间依赖性浸出,且损伤位于靠近表面处。硬水中浸出试样的粗糙度比软水中高18%。样品表面方解石的形成不仅通过形成保护表面层影响浸出速率,还可能起到钙离子泵的作用。