Niu Jianguang, Xin Boxiong, Xin Boyu, Zhang Yuke, Wang Mingqi
School of Urban Geology and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, 050031, Hebei, China.
Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Intelligent Development and Control of Underground Built Environment, Shijiazhuang, 050031, Hebei, China.
Carbon Balance Manag. 2024 Apr 13;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13021-024-00259-z.
Energy conservation and emission reduction policies restrict the economic and social development of all countries in the world, and the impact on China, which has low urbanization, is more serious. In the process of promoting urbanization, the pressure of carbon emission reduction in the construction industry has increased, and the high emissions of the construction industry have made the low-carbon development of cities face severe challenges. China is at a critical stage of urbanization development, and there is become a general consensus on how to improve the carbon emission efficiency of the construction industry. The interaction between urbanization and the carbon emission efficiency of the construction industry is a long-term and complex process. As one of the industries contributing to China's urbanization process and carbon emissions, it is of great practical significance to explore the coordination relationship between urbanization and the carbon emission efficiency of the construction industry (CEECI) to realize the goal of "double carbon", promoting urbanization construction and solving the problem of "green development". Taking 30 provinces in China as the research target area, the double weighted summation method and the undesirable output superefficiency window-EBM-DEA model are used to measure the provincial urbanization level and CEECI, respectively. Then, the coupling coordination degree model of the relative development index is introduced, and the spatial autocorrelation model and the spatial and temporal differentiation characteristics of the coordination level of urbanization and the CEECI are analysed.
From 2010 to 2021, China's urbanization level increased steadily, but the growth rate gradually decreased. There were significant differences in urbanization levels among provinces. The eastern provinces have a higher level of urbanization but lack an impetus in the later period, while the western provinces have a lower level of urbanization but a faster growth rate. The low-carbon development trend of China's construction industry is good, and the overall development of the CEECI shows an "N" type, and the inflection points appear in 2013 and 2018. The interprovincial urbanization level is significantly different from that of the CEECI, and the development form of the central and western provinces is better than that of the eastern provinces. The coordination level of urbanization and the CEECI in China is transitioning from the running-in stage to the coordination stage, and the coupling coordination degree between systems is on the rise, while the relative development degree is on the decline. The spatial distribution pattern is in a dynamic state of change, and the overall distribution pattern is "high in the east and low in the central and western regions". The differences among provinces were significantly decreased, with 63.33% of provinces at the high running-in level. The provinces that entered the coordination stage were mainly located in the eastern region, and only Beijing was in the coordination stage by the end of the study. In addition, 90% of the provinces exhibited lagging efficiency, and only Jiangxi, Guangxi and Chongqing, which had low coordination levels maintained synchronous development of the two systems. The coordination level between provincial urbanization and the CEECI showed a positive spatial distribution, the global Moran index showed a "V" shape trend, and the spatial dependence of the coordination level between the two systems gradually weakened. In the local spatial distribution, there are two types of convergence: high and low.
The coordination degree of urbanization and the CEECI analysed in this study is an extension of the research on the relationship between the two. By integrating the two into a unified framework, the method of combining quantitative and qualitative analysis is used to further explore the coordination relationship between the two, which not only enhances the scientificity and accuracy of the research but also extends the breadth and depth of relevant theoretical research. At the same time, according to the coordination type between urbanization and the CEECI, China should propose corresponding targeted coordination and optimization paths from the perspective of urbanization and low-carbon development of the construction industry to achieve high-quality development of China's economy and society.
节能减排政策制约着世界各国的经济社会发展,对城市化水平较低的中国影响更为严重。在推进城市化进程中,建筑业碳减排压力增大,建筑业的高排放使城市低碳发展面临严峻挑战。中国正处于城市化发展的关键阶段,如何提高建筑业碳排放效率已成为普遍共识。城市化与建筑业碳排放效率之间的相互作用是一个长期而复杂的过程。作为推动中国城市化进程和碳排放的行业之一,探索城市化与建筑业碳排放效率(CEECI)之间的协调关系,对于实现“双碳”目标、推进城市化建设和解决“绿色发展”问题具有重要的现实意义。以中国30个省份为研究目标区域,分别采用双加权求和法和非期望产出超效率窗口-EBM-DEA模型测度省级城市化水平和CEECI。然后,引入相对发展指数的耦合协调度模型,分析城市化与CEECI协调水平的空间自相关模型及时空分异特征。
2010—2021年,中国城市化水平稳步提升,但增速逐渐放缓。各省城市化水平存在显著差异。东部省份城市化水平较高,但后期缺乏动力,而西部省份城市化水平较低,但增长速度较快。中国建筑业低碳发展态势良好,CEECI总体呈“N”型发展,拐点出现在2013年和2018年。省际城市化水平与CEECI差异显著,中西部省份发展形态优于东部省份。中国城市化与CEECI的协调水平正从磨合阶段向协调阶段过渡,系统间耦合协调度呈上升趋势,相对发展度呈下降趋势。空间分布格局处于动态变化状态,总体分布格局为“东部高,中西部低”。省际差异显著减小,63.33%的省份处于高度磨合水平。进入协调阶段的省份主要位于东部地区,到研究结束时只有北京处于协调阶段。此外,90%的省份表现出效率滞后,只有协调水平较低的江西、广西和重庆保持了两个系统的同步发展。省级城市化与CEECI之间的协调水平呈现正空间分布,全局莫兰指数呈“V”型趋势,两个系统间协调水平的空间依赖性逐渐减弱。在局部空间分布上,存在高-高和低-低两种集聚类型。
本研究分析的城市化与CEECI协调度是对两者关系研究的拓展。将两者纳入统一框架,运用定量与定性相结合的分析方法,进一步探索两者之间的协调关系,不仅增强了研究的科学性和准确性,也拓展了相关理论研究的广度和深度。同时,根据城市化与CEECI之间的协调类型,中国应从城市化和建筑业低碳发展的角度提出相应的针对性协调优化路径,以实现中国经济社会的高质量发展。