Department of Neurosurgery, GHU Paris - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France; Department of Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Seizure. 2024 Apr;117:298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.02.011. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
BACKGROUND: Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation (RS-VNS) is indicated when the procedure was deemed not technically feasible or too risky on the indicated left side. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to systematically review the literature on RS-VNS, assessing its effectiveness and safety. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted: Pubmed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase and Web of science databases were searched from inception to August 13th,2023. Gray literature was searched in two libraries. Eligible studies included all studies reporting, at least, one single case of RS-VNS in patients for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. RESULTS: Out of 2333 initial results, 415 studies were screened by abstract. Only four were included in the final analysis comprising seven patients with RS-VNS for a drug-resistant epilepsy. One patient experienced nocturnal asymptomatic bradycardia whereas the other six patients did not display any cardiac symptom. RS-VNS was discontinued in one case due to exercise-induced airway disease exacerbation. Decrease of epileptic seizure frequency after RS-VNS ranged from 25 % to 100 % in six cases. In the remaining case, VNS effectiveness was unclear. In one case, RS-VNS was more efficient than left-sided VNS (69 % vs 50 %, respectively) whereas in another case, RS-VNS was less efficient (50 % vs 95 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: Literature on the present topic is limited. In six out of seven patients, RS-VNS for drug-resistant epilepsy displayed reasonable effectiveness with a low complication rate. Further research, including prospective studies, is necessary to assess safety and effectiveness of RS-VNS for drug-resistant epilepsy patients.
背景:当认为左侧手术在技术上不可行或风险太高时,会选择右侧迷走神经刺激(RS-VNS)。
目的:本研究旨在系统地综述右侧迷走神经刺激(RS-VNS)的文献,评估其有效性和安全性。
方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行系统综述:从建库到 2023 年 8 月 13 日,检索 Pubmed/MEDLINE、The Cochrane Library、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of science 数据库;在两个图书馆中检索灰色文献。纳入研究标准为:至少报告 1 例 RS-VNS 治疗耐药性癫痫患者的病例报告。
结果:在 2333 篇初始结果中,通过摘要筛选出 415 篇研究。最终分析纳入 4 项研究,共 7 例患者行 RS-VNS 治疗耐药性癫痫。1 例患者出现夜间无症状心动过缓,其余 6 例患者未出现任何心脏症状。1 例因运动诱发气道疾病恶化而停用 RS-VNS。6 例患者癫痫发作频率降低 25%至 100%,另 1 例患者的 VNS 效果不明确。在 1 例患者中,RS-VNS 比左侧 VNS 更有效(分别为 69%和 50%),而在另 1 例患者中,RS-VNS 效果较差(分别为 50%和 95%)。
结论:目前关于该主题的文献有限。在 7 例患者中,6 例 RS-VNS 治疗耐药性癫痫的有效性较好,并发症发生率较低。需要进一步的研究,包括前瞻性研究,以评估 RS-VNS 治疗耐药性癫痫患者的安全性和有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-4-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-14
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022-3-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-9-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-5
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025-8-29
Epilepsia Open. 2025-8
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2025-3
Front Physiol. 2024-10-9