Zanello Marc, Voges Berthold, Chelvarajah Ramesh, Sen Arjune, Petelin Gadže Željka, Penchet Guillaume, De Benedictis Alessandro, Fornaro Riccardo, Iwasaki Masaki, Iijima Keiya, Jiltsova Elena, Mrak Goran, Barrit Sami, Moiraghi Alessandro, Landi Andrea, Neale Marcus, Magdum Shailendra, Caire François, Godet Bertrand, Domenech Philippe, Gaillard Raphael, Guenot Marc, Labuschagne Jason, Rainha Campos Alexandre, Rooijakkers Herbert, El Tahry Riëm, Von Hertwig Fernandes De Oliveira Tatiana, Alvarez-Sala Amelia, Torres Cristina V, Vale Fernando, Pallud Johan, Carron Romain
Department of Neurosurgery, GHU Paris - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France.
Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2025 Mar;12(3):565-576. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52312. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is indicated for implantation on the left vagus nerve-only. In rare cases right-sided VNS may be the only option. With only seven published cases in the literature, data on safety and effectiveness of right-sided VNS is very limited.
An anonymous 38-item questionnaire was sent to expert surgeons implanting VNS for DRE. The questions covered demographics and clinical characteristics, the reason for right-sided implantation and both neurological and surgical outcomes of right-sided VNS.
The survey captured 38 cases of right-sided VNS (18 females, mean age at surgery of 28.0 ± 16.3 years). Right-sided VNS was performed because of VNS lead deficiency (n = 20), anatomical constraints (n = 8), infection of a left-sided VNS site (n = 9), and presence of a left ventricular shunt (n = 1). Thirty-two patients (84%) had a preoperative cardiac assessment. Three patients presented postoperative cardiac side-effects. Right-sided VNS was stopped at last follow-up in three patients: due to deep infection (n = 1), due to dyspnea (n = 1), and due to sleep apnea syndrome (n = 1). Twenty-one patients (55%) were responders to right-sided VNS and the mean reduction of seizure frequency under right-sided VNS was 56.2 ± 18.8%. Focusing on seizure frequency reduction between right-sided VNS and left-sided VNS: 20 patients experienced similar effectiveness, 1 experienced lesser effectiveness, and 2 patients experienced greater effectiveness with right-sided VNS.
This multicenter case series significantly augments the available literature on right-sided VNS. This suggests comparable effectiveness to left-sided VNS but potentially lower tolerability. Further studies are warranted to better evaluate safety and efficacy of right-sided VNS.
迷走神经刺激术(VNS)是一种已确立的耐药性癫痫(DRE)治疗方法,仅适用于植入左侧迷走神经。在极少数情况下,右侧VNS可能是唯一的选择。由于文献中仅发表了7例病例,关于右侧VNS安全性和有效性的数据非常有限。
向为DRE植入VNS的专家外科医生发送了一份包含38个条目的匿名问卷。问题涵盖人口统计学和临床特征、右侧植入的原因以及右侧VNS的神经学和手术结果。
该调查收集了38例右侧VNS病例(18例女性,手术时平均年龄28.0±16.3岁)。进行右侧VNS的原因包括VNS导线不足(n = 20)、解剖限制(n = 8)、左侧VNS部位感染(n = 9)和存在左心室分流(n = 1)。32例患者(84%)进行了术前心脏评估。3例患者出现术后心脏副作用。在最后一次随访中,3例患者停止了右侧VNS:1例因深部感染,1例因呼吸困难,1例因睡眠呼吸暂停综合征。21例患者(55%)对右侧VNS有反应,右侧VNS下癫痫发作频率的平均降低为56.2±18.8%。关注右侧VNS和左侧VNS之间癫痫发作频率的降低:20例患者效果相似,1例效果较差,2例患者右侧VNS效果更好。
这个多中心病例系列显著扩充了关于右侧VNS的现有文献。这表明其有效性与左侧VNS相当,但耐受性可能较低。有必要进行进一步研究以更好地评估右侧VNS的安全性和有效性。