Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes and Speech Therapy Department, Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain.
Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes and Speech Therapy Department, Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Aug;123:105425. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105425. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
This comprehensive meta-analysis investigates the association between olfactory deficits in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).
A thorough search across databases identified articles analyzing olfactory status in MCI or AD patients. Methodological quality assessment followed PRISMA guidelines. Hedges' g effect size statistic computed standard mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Moderator analysis was conducted.
Among the included studies (65 for MCI and 61 for AD), odor identification exhibited larger effect sizes compared to odor threshold and discrimination, in both MCI and AD samples. Moderate effect size is found in OI scores in MCI (k = 65, SE = 0.078, CI 95% = [-1.151, -0.844]). Furthermore, compared to MCI, AD had moderate to large heterogeneous effects in olfactory identification (k = 61, g = -2.062, SE = 0.125, CI 95% = [-2.308, -1.816]). Global cognitive status is positively related to olfactory identification impairment in both MCI (k = 57, Z = 2.74, p = 0.006) and AD (k = 53, Z = 5.03, p < 0.0001) samples.
Olfactory impairments exhibit a notable and substantial presence in MCI. Among these impairments, odor identification experiences the greatest decline in MCI, mirroring the primary sensory deficit observed in AD. Consequently, the incorporation of a straightforward odor identification test is advisable in the evaluation of individuals vulnerable to the onset of AD, offering a practical screening tool for early detection.
本综合荟萃分析旨在探讨轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者嗅觉缺陷之间的关联。
通过全面检索数据库,确定了分析 MCI 或 AD 患者嗅觉状况的文章。方法学质量评估遵循 PRISMA 指南。采用 Hedges'g 效应量统计计算标准均数差和 95%置信区间。进行了调节分析。
在纳入的研究中(MCI 为 65 项,AD 为 61 项),与嗅觉阈值和辨别力相比,MCI 和 AD 样本中,气味识别的效应量更大。在 MCI 中,OI 评分的中等效应量(k=65,SE=0.078,CI95%=[-1.151,-0.844])。此外,与 MCI 相比,AD 在嗅觉识别方面存在中度至较大的异质性效应(k=61,g=-2.062,SE=0.125,CI95%=[-2.308,-1.816])。在 MCI(k=57,Z=2.74,p=0.006)和 AD(k=53,Z=5.03,p<0.0001)样本中,总体认知状态与嗅觉识别障碍呈正相关。
嗅觉障碍在 MCI 中表现出明显而显著的存在。在这些障碍中,MCI 中的气味识别下降最大,反映了 AD 中观察到的主要感觉缺陷。因此,建议在评估易患 AD 的个体时纳入简单的气味识别测试,为早期发现提供实用的筛查工具。