Center on Alcohol, Substance use, And Addictions; Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, United States.
Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, United States; The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jul;142:107538. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107538. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
Although modestly effective treatments exist for alcohol use disorder (AUD), many individuals return to heavy drinking after treatment, suggesting the need for better understanding of factors that contribute to maintaining abstinence or drinking reductions. Whereas past studies identified what treatments work for AUD, recent studies focus more on why particular treatments work, and the mechanisms by which treatment leads to change. This focus on mechanisms of behavior change (MOBC) may inform the process by which treatment leads to better outcomes, and also may lead to new treatments or modifications of existing treatments that target empirically supported mechanisms known to lead to change. There is a paucity of studies examining MOBC from a neurocognitive perspective.
To address this gap in knowledge, the study described here is examining emotional reactivity, alcohol cue reactivity, and cognitive control as potential MOBC at three levels of analysis - self-report, behavior, and neural.
One hundred ten treatment-seeking individuals with an AUD are being randomized to receive 8 sessions of either Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) or Mindfulness Based Treatment (MBT) after up to 4 sessions of a platform treatment focused on enhancing motivation to change. To establish the temporal relationship between changes in drinking and changes in MOBC, patients are assessed at baseline, during and immediately after treatment, and 9- and 15-months post-baseline. Relationships between changes in drinking and changes in the proposed MOBC will be examined using advanced mixed modeling techniques.
Results should advance AUD treatment by targeting treatments to neurocognitive MOBC.
尽管存在一些适度有效的治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的方法,但许多患者在治疗后仍会恢复大量饮酒,这表明需要更好地了解维持戒断或减少饮酒的因素。虽然过去的研究确定了哪些治疗方法对 AUD 有效,但最近的研究更侧重于特定治疗方法为何有效,以及治疗如何导致变化的机制。这种对行为改变机制(MOBC)的关注可能会影响治疗导致更好结果的过程,也可能会导致针对已知导致变化的循证机制的新治疗方法或现有治疗方法的修改。从神经认知的角度研究 MOBC 的研究很少。
为了填补这一知识空白,本研究正在从自我报告、行为和神经三个分析水平检查情绪反应、酒精线索反应和认知控制作为潜在的 MOBC。
110 名寻求治疗的 AUD 患者被随机分配接受 8 次认知行为治疗(CBT)或基于正念的治疗(MBT),此前他们接受了最多 4 次以增强改变动机为重点的平台治疗。为了确定饮酒变化和 MOBC 变化之间的时间关系,患者在基线、治疗期间和治疗后立即以及基线后 9 个月和 15 个月进行评估。使用先进的混合建模技术检查饮酒变化和拟议 MOBC 变化之间的关系。
结果应该通过针对神经认知 MOBC 的治疗来推进 AUD 治疗。