Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Oct 15;49(20):1410-1416. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005007. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
Retrospective cohort study of prospectively accrued data.
To evaluate a large, prospective, multicentre dataset of surgically treated degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) cases on the contemporary risk of C5 palsy with surgical approach.
The influence of surgical technique on postoperative C5 palsy after decompression for DCM is intensely debated. Comprehensive, covariate-adjusted analyses are needed using contemporary data.
Patients with moderate to severe DCM were prospectively enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, Phase III CSM-Protect clinical trial and underwent either anterior or posterior decompression between Jan 31, 2012 and May 16, 2017. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative C5 palsy, defined as the onset of muscle weakness by at least one grade in manual muscle test at the C5 myotome with slight or absent sensory disruption after cervical surgery. Two comparative cohorts were made based on the anterior or posterior surgical approach. Multivariate hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for C5 palsy.
A total of 283 patients were included, and 53.4% underwent posterior decompression. The total incidence of postoperative C5 palsy was 7.4% and was significantly higher in patients who underwent posterior decompression compared with anterior decompression (11.26% vs. 3.03%, P =0.008). After multivariable regression, the posterior approach was independently associated with greater than four times the likelihood of postoperative C5 palsy ( P =0.017). Rates of C5 palsy recovery were comparable between the two surgical approaches.
The odds of postoperative C5 palsy are significantly higher after posterior decompression compared to anterior decompression for DCM. This may influence surgical decision-making when there is equipoise in deciding between anterior and posterior treatment options for DCM.
Therapeutic Level-II.
回顾性队列研究,前瞻性收集数据。
评估一项针对退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)手术治疗的大型前瞻性多中心数据集,以评估手术入路对术后 C5 瘫痪的风险。
手术技术对 DCM 减压后术后 C5 瘫痪的影响存在激烈争议。需要使用现代数据进行全面的、协变量调整的分析。
患有中度至重度 DCM 的患者前瞻性纳入多中心、随机、三期 CSM-Protect 临床试验,并于 2012 年 1 月 31 日至 2017 年 5 月 16 日期间接受前路或后路减压。主要结局是术后 C5 瘫痪的发生率,定义为颈椎手术后 C5 肌节的手动肌肉测试至少有一个等级的肌肉无力,并且轻微或无感觉障碍。根据前路或后路手术入路,建立了两个比较队列。使用多变量分层混合效应逻辑回归来估计术后 C5 瘫痪的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
共纳入 283 例患者,其中 53.4%行后路减压。术后 C5 瘫痪的总发生率为 7.4%,后路减压患者明显高于前路减压患者(11.26%比 3.03%,P=0.008)。多变量回归后,后路入路与术后 C5 瘫痪的可能性增加四倍以上独立相关(P=0.017)。两种手术方法的 C5 瘫痪恢复率相当。
与前路减压相比,后路减压治疗 DCM 后术后 C5 瘫痪的可能性显著增加。这可能会影响在决定 DCM 的前路和后路治疗方案之间的平衡时的手术决策。
治疗性 II 级。