• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在放射肿瘤医学物理培训中实施计划评估模型。

Implementation of a programmatic assessment model in radiation oncology medical physics training.

机构信息

Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 May;25(5):e14354. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14354. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1002/acm2.14354
PMID:38620004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11087179/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In 2019, a formal review and update of the current training program for medical physics residents/registrars in Australasia was conducted. The purpose of this was to ensure the program met current local clinical and technological requirements, to improve standardization of training across Australia and New Zealand and generate a dynamic curriculum and programmatic assessment model.

METHODS

A four-phase project was initiated, including a consultant desktop review of the current program and stakeholder consultation. Overarching program outcomes on which to base the training model were developed, with content experts used to update the scientific content. Finally, assessment specialists reviewed a range of assessment models to determine appropriate assessment methods for each learning outcome, creating a model of programmatic assessment.

RESULTS

The first phase identified a need for increased standardized assessment incorporating programmatic assessment. Seven clear program outcome statements were generated and used to guide and underpin the new curriculum framework. The curriculum was expanded from the previous version to include emerging technologies, while removing previous duplication. Finally, a range of proposed assessments for learning outcomes in the curriculum were generated into the programmatic assessment model. These new assessment methods were structured to incorporate rubric scoring to provide meaningful feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

An updated training program for Radiation Oncology Medial Physics registrars/residents was released in Australasia. Scientific content from a previous program was used as a foundation and revised for currency with the ability to accommodate a dynamic curriculum model. A programmatic model of assessment was created after comprehensive review and consultation. This new model of assessment provides more structured, ongoing assessment throughout the training period. It contains allowances for local bespoke assessment, and guidance for supervisors by the provision of marking templates and rubrics.

摘要

目的

2019 年,对澳大拉西亚目前的医学物理住院医师/研究员培训计划进行了正式审查和更新。这样做的目的是确保该计划符合当前当地的临床和技术要求,提高澳大利亚和新西兰培训的标准化,并生成动态课程和计划评估模型。

方法

启动了一个四阶段的项目,包括对当前计划的顾问桌面审查和利益相关者协商。制定了涵盖培训模型的总体计划成果,内容专家用于更新科学内容。最后,评估专家审查了一系列评估模型,以确定每种学习成果的适当评估方法,创建一个计划评估模型。

结果

第一阶段确定需要增加包含计划评估的标准化评估。生成了七个明确的计划成果陈述,并用于指导和支持新课程框架。课程从以前的版本扩展到包括新兴技术,同时删除了以前的重复内容。最后,为课程中的学习成果生成了一系列建议的评估,纳入了计划评估模型。这些新的评估方法被构建为纳入等级评分,以提供有意义的反馈。

结论

在澳大拉西亚发布了更新的放射肿瘤医学物理住院医师/研究员培训计划。以前计划的科学内容被用作基础,并进行了修订以适应课程的动态模型。经过全面审查和协商,创建了计划评估模型。这种新的评估模式提供了更具结构性、贯穿整个培训期的持续评估。它允许进行本地定制评估,并通过提供评分模板和等级评分来为主管提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/11087179/67229098bc9e/ACM2-25-e14354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/11087179/67229098bc9e/ACM2-25-e14354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/11087179/67229098bc9e/ACM2-25-e14354-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a programmatic assessment model in radiation oncology medical physics training.在放射肿瘤医学物理培训中实施计划评估模型。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 May;25(5):e14354. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14354. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
Radiation Oncology Training Program Curriculum developments in Australia and New Zealand: Design, implementation and evaluation--What next?澳大利亚和新西兰放射肿瘤学培训项目课程的发展:设计、实施与评估——下一步是什么?
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Dec;59(6):728-35. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12337. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
A patient safety education program in a medical physics residency.医学物理住院医师培训中的患者安全教育项目。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):268-274. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12166. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
The AAPM/ASTRO 2023 Core Physics Curriculum for Radiation Oncology Residents.美国医学物理学会/美国放射肿瘤学会 2023 年放射肿瘤学住院医师核心物理课程。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Feb 1;118(2):325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.063. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
Introductory Radiation Oncology Curriculum: Report of a National Needs Assessment and Multi-institutional Pilot Implementation.入门放射肿瘤学课程:国家需求评估和多机构试点实施报告。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Aug 1;101(5):1029-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Navigating the medical physics education and training landscape.探索医学物理教育与培训领域。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):275-287. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12202.
7
The American Society for Radiation Oncology's 2010 core physics curriculum for radiation oncology residents.美国放射肿瘤学会 2010 年放射肿瘤学住院医师核心物理课程。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):1190-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.061. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
8
Assessment of Radiology Training During Radiation Oncology Residency.放射肿瘤学住院医师培训期间的放射学培训评估
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):691-695. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1357-1.
9
Reforming Medical Physics and Radiopharmaceutical Science Training Through a Programmatic Approach to Assessment.通过系统性评估方法改革医学物理与放射性药物科学培训。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Sep 5;11:23821205241271539. doi: 10.1177/23821205241271539. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to comments made on the topical debate: "In Australia professional registration for qualified medical physicists should be mandated through the Australian health practitioner regulation agency (AHPRA)".对主题辩论中所提意见的回应:“在澳大利亚,应通过澳大利亚卫生从业者监管局(AHPRA)对合格医学物理师进行职业注册”。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s13246-025-01576-4.

本文引用的文献

1
When I say … programmatic assessment in postgraduate medical education.当我说……研究生医学教育中的程序化评估。
Med Educ. 2019 Nov;53(11):1074-1076. doi: 10.1111/medu.13949. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
On the issue of costs in programmatic assessment.关于方案评估中的成本问题。
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Oct;5(5):303-7. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0295-z.
3
The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice.程序化评估对学生学习的影响:理论与实践
Med Educ. 2015 May;49(5):487-98. doi: 10.1111/medu.12645.
4
Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment.程序化评估的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2015 Jul;37(7):641-646. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Reflections on TEAP: training for the future of medical physics.关于医学物理师培训与教育计划(TEAP)的思考:为医学物理的未来培养人才。
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2013 Jun;36(2):143-5. doi: 10.1007/s13246-013-0204-2.
6
A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.适合目的的计划性评估模型。
Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239.
7
The education and training of clinical medical physicists in 25 European, 2 North American and 2 Australasian countries: similarities and differences.25 个欧洲国家、2 个北美国家和 2 个澳大拉西亚国家的临床医学物理学家的教育和培训:相似之处和差异。
Phys Med. 2012 Jul;28(3):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
8
A comparison of medical physics training and education programs--Canada and Australia.加拿大与澳大利亚医学物理培训与教育项目的比较
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2009 Dec;32(4):251-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03179246.
9
The European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics. Policy Statement No. 12: The present status of Medical Physics Education and Training in Europe. New perspectives and EFOMP recommendations.欧洲医学物理组织联合会. 政策声明第 12 号:欧洲医学物理教育和培训的现状. 新视角和 EFOMP 建议。
Phys Med. 2010 Jan;26(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
10
Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes.评估专业能力:从方法到方案。
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):309-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x.