• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

程序化评估的十二条建议。

Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment.

作者信息

Van Der Vleuten C P M, Schuwirth L W T, Driessen E W, Govaerts M J B, Heeneman S

机构信息

a Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.

b Flinders University , Adelaide , Australia.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2015 Jul;37(7):641-646. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388
PMID:25410481
Abstract

Programmatic assessment is an integral approach to the design of an assessment program with the intent to optimise its learning function, its decision-making function and its curriculum quality-assurance function. Individual methods of assessment, purposefully chosen for their alignment with the curriculum outcomes and their information value for the learner, the teacher and the organisation, are seen as individual data points. The information value of these individual data points is maximised by giving feedback to the learner. There is a decoupling of assessment moment and decision moment. Intermediate and high-stakes decisions are based on multiple data points after a meaningful aggregation of information and supported by rigorous organisational procedures to ensure their dependability. Self-regulation of learning, through analysis of the assessment information and the attainment of the ensuing learning goals, is scaffolded by a mentoring system. Programmatic assessment-for-learning can be applied to any part of the training continuum, provided that the underlying learning conception is constructivist. This paper provides concrete recommendations for implementation of programmatic assessment.

摘要

程序化评估是评估计划设计中不可或缺的方法,旨在优化其学习功能、决策功能和课程质量保证功能。为使其与课程成果相匹配并对学习者、教师和机构具有信息价值而特意选择的个别评估方法,被视为一个个数据点。通过向学习者提供反馈,这些个别数据点的信息价值得以最大化。评估时刻与决策时刻相互分离。中级和高风险决策基于在对信息进行有意义的汇总之后的多个数据点,并由严格的组织程序提供支持,以确保其可靠性。通过对评估信息的分析和实现随之而来的学习目标,学习的自我调节由一个指导系统提供支撑。只要基础学习理念是建构主义的,学习的程序化评估就可以应用于培训连续体的任何部分。本文为程序化评估的实施提供了具体建议。

相似文献

1
Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment.程序化评估的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2015 Jul;37(7):641-646. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
2
Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.旁观者眼中的利害关系:国际计划评估学习感知研究。
Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):654-663. doi: 10.1111/medu.13532. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
3
A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.适合目的的计划性评估模型。
Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239.
4
An application of programmatic assessment for learning (PAL) system for general practice training.用于全科医学培训的学习性程序化评估(PAL)系统的应用。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;34(5):Doc56. doi: 10.3205/zma001133. eCollection 2017.
5
On the issue of costs in programmatic assessment.关于方案评估中的成本问题。
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Oct;5(5):303-7. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0295-z.
6
Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.在方案评估中创造有利条件:叙事信息质量如何影响高风险决策质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 28;22(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03257-2.
7
A practical approach to programmatic assessment design.一种用于规划性评估设计的实用方法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1169-1182. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
8
Incorporating aspects of programmatic assessment into examinations: Aggregating rich information to inform decision-making.将方案评估的内容纳入考试:整合丰富的信息以辅助决策。
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):567-574. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1878122. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
9
Does an incremental approach to implementing programmatic assessment work? Reflections on the change process.采用渐进式方法实施程序性评估是否可行?对变革过程的思考。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Mar 27;9:55. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000055.1. eCollection 2020.
10
The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice.程序化评估对学生学习的影响:理论与实践
Med Educ. 2015 May;49(5):487-98. doi: 10.1111/medu.12645.

引用本文的文献

1
Many Minds, One Model: Exploring Decision Making of an Undergraduate Medicine Competency Committee Using the Construct of a Shared Mental Model.众心一模:运用共享心智模型构建探索本科医学能力委员会的决策过程
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Aug 13;14(1):493-503. doi: 10.5334/pme.1949. eCollection 2025.
2
Academic coaching as a pedagogy to facilitate the navigation of complexity across the health professions education continuum.学术辅导作为一种教学方法,以促进在整个健康职业教育连续体中应对复杂性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 6;12:1523741. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1523741. eCollection 2025.
3
Faculty development for undergraduate student programmatic assessment: a Brazilian multi-centered longitudinal study.
本科生课程评估的教师发展:一项巴西多中心纵向研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 23;25(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07337-x.
4
Enhancing occupational therapy education: Evaluating the impact of a STEAM-based assistive technology curriculum using Kirkpatrick's four-level model.加强职业治疗教育:使用柯克帕特里克四级模型评估基于STEAM的辅助技术课程的影响。
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Aug;87(8):512-523. doi: 10.1177/03080226241239563. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Applying collaborativist theory to reenvision small-group learning in emergency medicine education.应用合作主义理论重新构想急诊医学教育中的小组学习。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Apr 29;9(Suppl 1):S40-S50. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70010. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
There is no "too small" for frequent workplace-based assessment: Differences between large and small residency programs in anesthesia when using a mobile application to assess EPAs.对于基于工作场所的频繁评估而言,不存在“规模过小”的问题:在使用移动应用程序评估可托付专业活动(EPA)时,麻醉专业大、小住院医师培训项目之间的差异
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Nov 15;41(5):Doc54. doi: 10.3205/zma001709. eCollection 2024.
7
Continuous assessment in medical education: Exploring students' views on the progress test.医学教育中的持续评估:探究学生对进阶测试的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0314848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314848. eCollection 2024.
8
Experts' prediction of item difficulty of multiple-choice questions in the Ethiopian Undergraduate Medicine Licensure Examination.专家对埃塞俄比亚本科医学执照考试选择题项目难度的预测。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1016. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06012-x.
9
Reforming Medical Physics and Radiopharmaceutical Science Training Through a Programmatic Approach to Assessment.通过系统性评估方法改革医学物理与放射性药物科学培训。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Sep 5;11:23821205241271539. doi: 10.1177/23821205241271539. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Combatting Fragmentation: Lessons Learned from an Integrative Approach to Teaching Health Equity.对抗碎片化:从健康公平性综合教学方法中汲取的经验教训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan;40(1):213-216. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08967-5. Epub 2024 Aug 5.