Lebares Carter C, Greenberg Anya L, Gonzales Paul A, Boscardin Christy K
Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 0790, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA.
Departments of Medicine and Anesthesia, Univeristy of Carlifornia San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 0790, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA.
Global Surg Educ. 2022;1(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s44186-022-00008-1. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
Physician wellbeing is critical to high-quality sustainable healthcare and optimal patient experience. Few objective measures exist to assay wellbeing (as opposed to just pathology) in surgery, or to evaluate the efficacy of wellbeing interventions. Flourishing (as measured by the Mental Health Continuum, MHC) has been suggested as a concise measure of global wellbeing in surgeons. We aimed to establish validity evidence for flourishing in a large national sample of surgical trainees, explore differences by gender and race, and confirm support for the underlying constructs.
This cross-sectional study of all General Surgery residents at 16 ACGME-accredited academic programs included an online survey of published measures distributed in February 2021. The Mental Health Continuum (MHC), a three-factor model, assesses emotional, social, and psychological wellbeing and is an established metric of psychosocial thriving in non-physicians. A global score cut-off exists for flourishing which represents high wellbeing. Correlation between flourishing and established measures of risk and resilience in surgery were assessed for validity evidence. Differences by gender and race were explored. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to confirm the three-factor structure in surgical trainees.
300 residents (60% non-male, 41% non-white) responded to the survey. For the overall group, flourishing was significantly correlated with all wellbeing resilience factors and correlated with all risk factors. This held true for race and gender subgroups based on interaction analyses. CFA and sensitivity analysis results supported the three-factor structure.
Our findings offer validity evidence for flourishing as a measure of global wellbeing and confirm the three-factor structure of emotional, social, and psychological wellbeing in surgical trainees. Thus, the MHC may be a concise tool for assaying wellbeing, within and across subgroups, and for assessing wellbeing intervention effectiveness within the surgery.
医生的身心健康对于高质量的可持续医疗保健和优化患者体验至关重要。在外科领域,几乎没有客观的测量方法来评估身心健康(相对于仅评估病理状况而言),也没有评估身心健康干预措施的效果。蓬勃发展(通过心理健康连续体,即MHC来衡量)已被提议作为外科医生整体身心健康的一种简明测量方法。我们旨在为大量全国性样本的外科住院医师建立蓬勃发展的效度证据,探讨性别和种族差异,并确认对潜在结构的支持。
这项对16个经ACGME认证的学术项目中的所有普通外科住院医师进行的横断面研究,包括于2021年2月分发的已发表测量方法的在线调查。心理健康连续体(MHC)是一个三因素模型,用于评估情绪、社交和心理健康,是衡量非医生心理社会蓬勃发展的既定指标。存在一个代表高幸福感的蓬勃发展的全球得分临界值。评估蓬勃发展与外科手术中既定的风险和恢复力测量方法之间的相关性以获取效度证据。探讨性别和种族差异。进行验证性因素分析(CFA)以确认外科住院医师中的三因素结构。
300名住院医师(60%为非男性,41%为非白人)回复了调查。对于整个群体,蓬勃发展与所有幸福感恢复力因素显著相关,与所有风险因素相关。基于交互分析,种族和性别亚组的情况也是如此。CFA和敏感性分析结果支持三因素结构。
我们的研究结果为将蓬勃发展作为整体幸福感的一种测量方法提供了效度证据,并确认了外科住院医师情绪、社交和心理健康的三因素结构。因此,MHC可能是一种用于评估亚组内和亚组间幸福感,以及评估外科手术中幸福感干预效果的简明工具。