Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0296977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296977. eCollection 2024.
We sought to examine the relationship of unfavorable psychosocial working conditions with slips and lapses and poor patient interaction as well as potential intermediate factors among medical assistants (MAs) in Germany based on prospective data.
We used data from 408 MAs from a 4-year cohort study (follow-up: 2021). At baseline, psychosocial working conditions were assessed by the established effort-reward-imbalance questionnaire and a MA-specific questionnaire with 7 subscales. Frequency of slips and lapses (e.g., pertaining to measurements and documentation) and the quality of patient interactions (e.g., unfriendliness or impatience) due to work stress were assessed at follow-up with three items each (potential score ranges = 3-15). Potential intermediate factors at baseline included work engagement (i.e., vitality and dedication (UWES)), work satisfaction (COPSOQ), anxiety (GAD-2), depressiveness (PHQ-2), and self-reported health. We ran multivariable linear regression using z-standardized exposures to estimate unstandardized coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Potential intermediate factors were added separately to the regression models. Attenuation of the association between exposure and outcome toward the null value (B = 0) was interpreted as mediation.
High reward and lack of resources were weakly associated with the frequency of slips and lapses (the Bs were -0.18 and 0.23, respectively; p<0.05), with little evidence of mediation. With the exception of low recognition, all unfavorable psychosocial working conditions predicted a higher frequency of poor interactions with patients (p-values<0.01). These associations were attenuated by work engagement, work satisfaction, and health outcomes.
We found mostly non-significant associations between adverse psychosocial working conditions and the frequency of slips and lapses. However, unfavorable psychosocial working conditions among MAs predicted a higher frequency of poor interaction with patients due to stress.
我们旨在根据前瞻性数据,研究在德国医疗助理(MA)中,不良的心理社会工作条件与失误和疏忽以及与患者互动不良的关系,以及潜在的中间因素。
我们使用了一项为期 4 年的队列研究(随访:2021 年)中 408 名 MA 的数据。在基线时,使用已建立的努力-回报失衡问卷和一个具有 7 个分量表的 MA 特定问卷来评估心理社会工作条件。由于工作压力导致的失误和疏忽(例如,与测量和记录有关)以及与患者互动的质量(例如,不友好或不耐烦)在随访时使用三个项目进行评估(潜在评分范围=3-15)。基线时的潜在中间因素包括工作投入(即活力和专注度(UWES))、工作满意度(COPSOQ)、焦虑(GAD-2)、抑郁(PHQ-2)和自我报告的健康状况。我们使用 z 标准化暴露进行多变量线性回归,以估计未标准化系数(B)和 95%置信区间(CI)。分别将潜在中间因素添加到回归模型中。暴露与结果之间关联向零值(B=0)的衰减被解释为中介作用。
高回报和缺乏资源与失误和疏忽的频率呈弱相关(B 值分别为-0.18 和 0.23;p<0.05),中介作用的证据很少。除了低认可度外,所有不良的心理社会工作条件都预示着与患者互动不良的频率更高(p 值<0.01)。这些关联在工作投入、工作满意度和健康结果方面减弱。
我们发现,在不良心理社会工作条件与失误和疏忽的频率之间,大多数关联没有统计学意义。然而,MA 中不良的心理社会工作条件预示着由于压力导致与患者互动不良的频率更高。