Suppr超能文献

研究方案:使用通用标准(ICARUS)进行全球跨专业调查和共识的术中并发症评估和报告。

Study protocol for the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) global cross-specialty surveys and consensus.

机构信息

USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0297799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297799. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Annually, about 300 million surgeries lead to significant intraoperative adverse events (iAEs), impacting patients and surgeons. Their full extent is underestimated due to flawed assessment and reporting methods. Inconsistent adoption of new grading systems and a lack of standardization, along with litigation concerns, contribute to underreporting. Only half of relevant journals provide guidelines on reporting these events, with a lack of standards in surgical literature. To address these issues, the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standard (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration was established in 2022. The initiative involves conducting global surveys and a Delphi consensus to understand the barriers for poor reporting of iAEs, validate shared criteria for reporting, define iAEs according to surgical procedures, evaluate the existing grading systems' reliability, and identify strategies for enhancing the collection, reporting, and management of iAEs. Invitation to participate are extended to all the surgical specialties, interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, OR Staffs and anesthesiology. This effort represents an essential step towards improved patient safety and the well-being of healthcare professionals in the surgical field.

摘要

每年约有 3 亿例手术导致严重的术中不良事件(iAEs),影响患者和外科医生。由于评估和报告方法存在缺陷,其实际程度被低估了。新的分级系统采用不一致,缺乏标准化,加上诉讼问题,导致报告不足。只有一半的相关期刊提供了报告这些事件的指南,而外科文献中缺乏标准。为了解决这些问题,2022 年成立了术中并发症评估和报告通用标准(ICARUS)全球外科合作组织。该倡议涉及进行全球调查和德尔菲共识,以了解不良报告 iAEs 的障碍,验证报告的共享标准,根据手术程序定义 iAEs,评估现有分级系统的可靠性,并确定加强 iAEs 的收集、报告和管理的策略。邀请所有外科专业、介入心脏病学、介入放射学、手术室工作人员和麻醉学参与。这是朝着提高患者安全和改善外科领域医疗保健专业人员福祉迈出的重要一步。

相似文献

5
The Surgeon as the Second Victim? Results of the Boston Intraoperative Adverse Events Surgeons' Attitude (BISA) Study.
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jun;224(6):1048-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.039. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
7
Severity Grading Systems for Intraoperative Adverse Events. A Systematic Review of the Literature and Citation Analysis.
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):e973-e980. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005883. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Severity Grading Systems for Intraoperative Adverse Events. A Systematic Review of the Literature and Citation Analysis.
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):e973-e980. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005883. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
6
Intraoperative adverse events grading tools and their role in honest and accurate reporting of surgical outcomes.
Surgery. 2022 Sep;172(3):1035-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.029. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Defining and Studying Errors in Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.
Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):1067-1073. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005351. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
Assessing, grading, and reporting intraoperative adverse events during and after surgery.
Br J Surg. 2022 Mar 15;109(4):301-302. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab438.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验