• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高手术和麻醉围手术期不良事件标准化的策略：“从评估到收集、分级和报告的漫长道路”

Strategies for Improving the Standardization of Perioperative Adverse Events in Surgery and Anesthesiology: "The Long Road from Assessment to Collection, Grading and Reporting".

作者信息

Sayegh Aref S, Eppler Michael, Ballon Jorge, Hemal Sij, Goldenberg Mitchell, Sotelo Rene, Cacciamani Giovanni E

机构信息

The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):5115. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175115.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11175115
PMID:36079044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9457420/
Abstract

The assessment, collection, and reporting of all aspects of surgical procedures are crucial for optimizing patient safety and improving surgical/procedural quality [...].

摘要

手术程序各方面的评估、收集和报告对于优化患者安全和提高手术/操作质量至关重要[……]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c204/9457420/17a5b030bfde/jcm-11-05115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c204/9457420/ec1953aa0a0a/jcm-11-05115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c204/9457420/17a5b030bfde/jcm-11-05115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c204/9457420/ec1953aa0a0a/jcm-11-05115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c204/9457420/17a5b030bfde/jcm-11-05115-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategies for Improving the Standardization of Perioperative Adverse Events in Surgery and Anesthesiology: "The Long Road from Assessment to Collection, Grading and Reporting".提高手术和麻醉围手术期不良事件标准化的策略：“从评估到收集、分级和报告的漫长道路”
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):5115. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175115.
2
Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: Focus on Anesthesiology for Colorectal Surgery.为医疗保健研究和质量安全计划进行的证据审查：重点关注结直肠手术的麻醉学。
Anesth Analg. 2019 May;128(5):879-889. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003366.
3
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
4
Multimodal multidisciplinary standardization of perioperative care: still a long way to go.围手术期护理的多模式多学科标准化：仍有很长的路要走。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Apr;21(2):187-90. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f70042.
5
6
Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events and proposed strategies for reduction.神经外科不良事件的模式及降低不良事件发生率的策略。
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Nov;33(5):E1. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.FOCUS12184.
7
Orthopedic Surgery and Anesthesiology Surgical Improvement Strategies Project-Phase II Outcomes.骨科和麻醉外科学术改进策略项目-第二阶段结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1849-1856. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.054. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
8
Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: Focus on Anesthesiology for Total Knee Arthroplasty.为医疗保健研究和质量安全计划进行的证据审查：重点关注全膝关节置换术的麻醉。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Mar;128(3):441-453. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003564.
9
Quality Assessment of Intraoperative Adverse Event Reporting During 29 227 Robotic Partial Nephrectomies: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis.29227 例机器人辅助部分肾切除术术中不良事件报告的质量评估：系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;3(6):780-783. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 27.
10
Reporting of Perioperative Adverse Events by Pediatric Anesthesiologists at a Tertiary Children's Hospital: Targeted Interventions to Increase the Rate of Reporting.一家三级儿童医院的儿科麻醉医生对围手术期不良事件的报告：提高报告率的针对性干预措施。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1515-1523. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002208.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.腹股沟区淋巴结清扫术的并发症和不良事件：全球专家共识。
BJS Open. 2024 Jul 2;8(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056.
2
Study protocol for the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) global cross-specialty surveys and consensus.研究方案：使用通用标准（ICARUS）进行全球跨专业调查和共识的术中并发症评估和报告。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0297799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297799. eCollection 2024.
3
Recommendations for Intraoperative Adverse Events Data Collection in Clinical Studies and Study Protocols. An ICARUS Global Surgical Collaboration Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardizing The Intraoperative Adverse Events Assessment to Create a Positive Culture of Reporting Errors in Surgery and Anesthesiology.规范术中不良事件评估，营造外科和麻醉学领域积极的错误报告文化。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):e75-e76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005464. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
2
Intraoperative adverse events grading tools and their role in honest and accurate reporting of surgical outcomes.术中不良事件分级工具及其在如实准确报告手术结果中的作用。
Surgery. 2022 Sep;172(3):1035-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.029. Epub 2022 May 18.
3
The 'so what' of reporting guidelines.
临床研究和研究方案中术中不良事件数据收集的建议。一项伊卡洛斯全球外科合作研究。
Int J Surg Protoc. 2023 Feb 9;27(1):23-83. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.183. eCollection 2023.
4
Superior Mesenteric Artery Injury during Robotic Radical Nephrectomy: Scenarios and Management Strategies.机器人根治性肾切除术中肠系膜上动脉损伤：病例及处理策略
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 5;12(2):427. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020427.
报告指南的“那又怎样”。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2022 May 26;30(2):91-92. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riac035.
4
The Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration Project: Development of Criteria for Reporting Adverse Events During Surgical Procedures and Evaluating Their Impact on the Postoperative Course.通用标准术中并发症评估与报告（ICARUS）全球外科协作项目：制定手术过程中不良事件报告标准并评估其对术后病程的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1847-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
Assessing, grading, and reporting intraoperative adverse events during and after surgery.评估、分级并报告手术期间及术后的术中不良事件。
Br J Surg. 2022 Mar 15;109(4):301-302. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab438.
6
A Protocol for the Development of the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards Criteria: The ICARUS Project.《基于通用标准准则的术中并发症评估与报告制定方案：ICARUS项目》
Int J Surg Protoc. 2021 Aug 6;25(1):160-164. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.155. eCollection 2021.
7
Impact of the Implementation of the EAU Guidelines Recommendation on Reporting and Grading of Complications in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review.实施 EAU 指南建议对接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者的并发症报告和分级的影响：系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2021 Aug;80(2):129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.030. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌患者的盆腔淋巴结清扫术及其范围对围手术期并发症的影响：全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):134-149. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
9
Retrospective studies - utility and caveats.回顾性研究——实用性及注意事项。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2020 Dec;50(4):398-402. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2020.409.
10
Prospective validation of classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra): international, multicentre cohort study.前瞻性验证术中不良事件分类（ClassIntra）：国际多中心队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Aug 25;370:m2917. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2917.