Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e074373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074373.
We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of colchicine treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, medRxiv and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 2023.
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of colchicine treatment in patients with COVID-19 as compared with placebo or standard of care were included. There were no language restrictions. Studies that used colchicine prophylactically were excluded.
We extracted all information relating to the study characteristics, such as author names, location, study population, details of intervention and comparator groups, and our outcomes of interest. We conducted our meta-analysis by using RevMan V.5.4 with risk ratio (RR) and mean difference as the effect measures.
We included 23 RCTs (28 249 participants) in this systematic review. Colchicine did not decrease the risk of mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05; I=0%; 20 RCTs, 25 824 participants), with the results being consistent among both hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients. There were no significant differences between the colchicine and control groups in other relevant clinical outcomes, including the incidence of mechanical ventilation (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.18; p=0.22; I=40%; 8 RCTs, 13 262 participants), intensive care unit admission (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.22; p=0.27; I=0%; 6 RCTs, 961 participants) and hospital admission (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16; p=0.19; I=70%; 3 RCTs, 8572 participants).
The results of this meta-analysis do not support the use of colchicine as a treatment for reducing the risk of mortality or improving other relevant clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. However, RCTs investigating early treatment with colchicine (within 5 days of symptom onset or in patients with early-stage disease) are needed to fully elucidate the potential benefits of colchicine in this patient population.
CRD42022369850.
我们进行了一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查秋水仙碱治疗对 COVID-19 患者临床结局的影响。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们从建库到 2023 年 1 月在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、medRxiv 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行了检索。
所有比较秋水仙碱治疗与安慰剂或标准治疗在 COVID-19 患者中的疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)均被纳入。无语言限制。排除预防性使用秋水仙碱的研究。
我们提取了所有与研究特征相关的信息,如作者姓名、地点、研究人群、干预和对照组的详细信息,以及我们感兴趣的结局。我们使用 RevMan V.5.4 进行荟萃分析,使用风险比(RR)和均数差作为效应量。
我们在这项系统评价中纳入了 23 项 RCT(28249 名参与者)。秋水仙碱不能降低死亡率风险(RR 0.99;95%CI 0.93 至 1.05;I=0%;20 项 RCT,25824 名参与者),且在住院和非住院患者中结果一致。秋水仙碱组与对照组在其他相关临床结局方面也无显著差异,包括机械通气发生率(RR 0.75;95%CI 0.48 至 1.18;p=0.22;I=40%;8 项 RCT,13262 名参与者)、重症监护病房入院率(RR 0.77;95%CI 0.49 至 1.22;p=0.27;I=0%;6 项 RCT,961 名参与者)和住院入院率(RR 0.74;95%CI 0.48 至 1.16;p=0.19;I=70%;3 项 RCT,8572 名参与者)。
这项荟萃分析的结果不支持使用秋水仙碱作为降低 COVID-19 患者死亡率或改善其他相关临床结局的治疗方法。然而,需要进行 RCT 研究以评估早期使用秋水仙碱(症状出现后 5 天内或在疾病早期阶段)的疗效,以充分阐明秋水仙碱在该患者群体中的潜在获益。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022369850。