Suppr超能文献

采用社区参与和提供者参与方法将遗传咨询沟通技巧与患者结果和体验联系起来:GC-PRO 混合方法序贯解释研究的研究方案。

Linking genetic counseling communication skills to patient outcomes and experiences using a community-engagement and provider-engagement approach: research protocol for the GC-PRO mixed methods sequential explanatory study.

机构信息

Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e085472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085472.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In over 50 years since the genetic counseling (GC) profession began, a systematic study of GC communication skills and patient-reported outcomes in actual sessions across multiple clinical specialties has never been conducted. To optimize GC quality and improve efficiency of care, the field must first be able to comprehensively measure GC skills and determine which skills are most critical to achieving positive patient experiences and outcomes. This study aims to characterise GC communication skills using a novel and pragmatic measure and link variations in communication skills to patient-reported outcomes, across clinical specialties and with patients from diverse backgrounds in the USA. Our community-engagement and provider-engagement approach is crucial to develop recommendations for quality, culturally informed GC care, which are greatly needed to improve GC practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A mixed methods, sequential explanatory design will be used to collect and analyze: audio-recorded GC sessions in cancer, cardiac, and prenatal/reproductive genetic indications; pre-visit and post-visit quantitative surveys capturing patient experiences and outcomes and post-visit qualitative interview data. A novel, practical checklist will measure GC communication skills. Coincidence analysis will identify patterns of GC skills that are consistent with high scores on patient-reported measures. Two-level, multilevel models will be used to evaluate how GC communication skills and other session/patient characteristics predict patient-reported outcomes. Four community advisory boards (CABs) and a genetic counselor advisory board will inform the study design and analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the single Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota. This research poses no greater than minimal risk to participants. Results from this study will be shared through national and international conferences and through community-based dissemination as guided by the study's CABs. A lay summary will also be disseminated to all participants.

摘要

简介

自遗传咨询(GC)职业诞生以来的 50 多年里,从未对多个临床专业领域的实际咨询中 GC 沟通技巧和患者报告的结果进行过系统研究。为了优化 GC 的质量并提高护理效率,该领域首先必须能够全面衡量 GC 技能,并确定哪些技能对实现积极的患者体验和结果最为关键。本研究旨在使用新颖而实用的方法来描述 GC 沟通技巧,并将沟通技巧的变化与患者报告的结果联系起来,涵盖美国多个临床专业领域和具有不同背景的患者。我们的社区参与和提供者参与方法对于制定质量和文化上知情的 GC 护理建议至关重要,这些建议对于改善 GC 实践非常必要。

方法和分析

将采用混合方法、顺序解释性设计来收集和分析:癌症、心脏和产前/生殖遗传适应症中的 GC 咨询录音;在就诊前和就诊后收集定量调查数据,以捕获患者的体验和结果,并在就诊后进行定性访谈。将使用新颖实用的清单来衡量 GC 沟通技巧。一致性分析将确定与患者报告的测量结果高分一致的 GC 技能模式。使用两层、多层次模型评估 GC 沟通技巧和其他咨询/患者特征如何预测患者报告的结果。四个社区咨询委员会(CAB)和一个遗传咨询师咨询委员会将为研究设计和分析提供信息。

伦理和传播

本研究已获得明尼苏达大学单一机构审查委员会的批准。该研究对参与者的风险不超过最小风险。本研究的结果将通过全国和国际会议以及社区为导向的传播方式进行分享,由研究的 CAB 进行指导。还将向所有参与者传播一份通俗易懂的摘要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9c/11029319/0e763ac28114/bmjopen-2024-085472f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验