Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinsegae Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Orthopedic surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 17;25(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07431-z.
In transtendinous full thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCT) with remnant cuff, conventionally, cuff remnant of the greater tuberosity (GT) is debrided for better tendon to bone healing. However, larger cuff defect caused overtension on the repaired tendon. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and tendon integrity between remnant preserving and remnant debriding cuff repairs in the transtendinous FTRCT with remnant cuff.
From March, 2012 to October, 2017, a total of 127 patients who had the transtendinous FTRCT with remnant cuff were enrolled in this study. Rotator cuff tears were repaired arthroscopically, with patients divided into two groups: group I (n = 63), where rotator cuff remnants were preserved during the repair, and group II (n = 64), where the remnants were debrided during the repair. Clinical outcomes were assessed at the last follow-up (minimum 2 years) using the UCLA score, ASES score, SST score, Constant Shoulder score, and range of motion (ROM). The analysis of structural integrity and tendon quality was performed using the Sugaya classification on postoperative MRI scans at 8 months after surgery.
At the final follow-up, UCLA, ASES, SST, and CS scores significantly improved from preoperative values to postoperative (all p < 0.05): UCLA (I: 19.6 ± 6.0 to 31.7 ± 3.2, II: 18.0 ± 5.7 to 31.5 ± 3.2), ASES (I: 54.3 ± 10.7 to 86.5 ± 12.5, II: 18.0 ± 5.7 to 85.8 ± 12.4), SST (I: 5.6 ± 2.8 to 10.2 ± 2.0, II: 5.0 ± 2.9 to 10.1 ± 2.5), CS (I: 74.0 ± 17.2 to 87.8 ± 9.7, II: 62.0 ± 19.2 to 88.3 ± 6.2). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). Also, remnant preserving cuff repair yielded significantly better tendon quality on postoperative MRI (p < 0.05). The incidence of re-tear (Sugaya's Type IV and V) was not significantly different between the two groups (I:17% vs. II:19%; p = 0.053).
Remnant preserving rotator cuff repairs, which facilitate tendon-to-tendon healing, are superior in terms of tendon quality and are the preferred option for transtendinous FTRCT.
Retrospectively registered.
在带残余肩袖的全层经肌腱撕裂(FTRCT)中,传统上,为了更好地实现肌腱与骨的愈合,会对大结节(GT)残余肩袖进行清创。然而,较大的肩袖缺损会导致修复后的肌腱过度紧张。本研究旨在比较带残余肩袖的经肌腱 FTRCT 中保留残余肩袖和清除残余肩袖的修复术的临床结果和肌腱完整性。
2012 年 3 月至 2017 年 10 月,共纳入 127 例带残余肩袖的经肌腱 FTRCT 患者。采用关节镜修复肩袖撕裂,患者分为两组:组 I(n=63),修复过程中保留残余肩袖;组 II(n=64),修复过程中清除残余肩袖。在末次随访(至少 2 年)时采用 UCLA 评分、ASES 评分、SST 评分、Constant 肩关节评分和活动范围(ROM)评估临床结果。术后 8 个月的 MRI 扫描采用 Sugaya 分级分析结构完整性和肌腱质量。
末次随访时,UCLA、ASES、SST 和 CS 评分均较术前显著提高(均 P<0.05):UCLA(I:19.6±6.0 至 31.7±3.2,II:18.0±5.7 至 31.5±3.2)、ASES(I:54.3±10.7 至 86.5±12.5,II:18.0±5.7 至 85.8±12.4)、SST(I:5.6±2.8 至 10.2±2.0,II:5.0±2.9 至 10.1±2.5)、CS(I:74.0±17.2 至 87.8±9.7,II:62.0±19.2 至 88.3±6.2)。然而,两组之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,保留残余肩袖修复的术后 MRI 显示肌腱质量显著更好(P<0.05)。两组的再撕裂发生率(Sugaya Ⅳ型和Ⅴ型)无显著差异(I:17%比 II:19%;P=0.053)。
保留残余肩袖的修复有利于肌腱愈合,在肌腱质量方面更具优势,是经肌腱 FTRCT 的首选方法。
回顾性注册。