Department of Nephrology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2338929. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2338929. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
To delineate the efficacy and safety profile of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).
Patients who have been on MHD for a period of at least 3 months were enrolled. Each subject underwent one HFR and one hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment. Blood samples were collected before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment to test uremic toxin levels and to calculate clearance rate. The primary efficacy endpoint was to compare uremic toxin levels of indoxyl sulfate (IS), λ-free light chains (λFLC), and β-microglobulin (β-MG) before and after HFR treatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints was to compare the levels of urea, interleukin-6 (IL-6), P-cresol, chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40), leptin (LEP), hippuric acid (HPA), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) before and after HFR treatment. The study also undertook a comparative analysis of uremic toxin clearance between a single HFR and HDF treatment. Meanwhile, the lever of serum albumin and branched-chain amino acids before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment were compared. In terms of safety, the study was meticulous in recording vital signs and the incidence of adverse events throughout its duration.
The study enrolled 20 patients. After a single HFR treatment, levels of IS, λFLC, β-MG, IL-6, P-cresol, YKL-40, LEP, HPA, TMAO, ADMA, TNF-α, and FGF23 significantly decreased ( < 0.001 for all). The clearance rates of λFLC, β-MG, IL-6, LEP, and TNF-α were significantly higher in HFR compared to HDF ( values: 0.036, 0.042, 0.041, 0.019, and 0.036, respectively). Compared with pre-HFR and post-HFR treatment, levels of serum albumin, valine, and isoleucine showed no significant difference ( > 0.05), while post-HDF, levels of serum albumin significantly decreased ( = 0.000).
HFR treatment effectively eliminates uremic toxins from the bloodstream of patients undergoing MHD, especially protein-bound toxins and large middle-molecule toxins. Additionally, it retains essential physiological compounds like albumin and branched-chain amino acids, underscoring its commendable safety profile.
描述内源性再灌注血液透析(HFR)在维持性血液透析(MHD)患者中用于尿毒症毒素清除的疗效和安全性。
纳入至少进行 3 个月 MHD 的患者。每位患者接受一次 HFR 和一次血液透析滤过(HDF)治疗。在单次 HFR 或 HDF 治疗前后采集血样,以检测尿毒症毒素水平并计算清除率。主要疗效终点是比较 HFR 治疗前后吲哚硫酸(IS)、λ-无游离轻链(λFLC)和β-微球蛋白(β-MG)的尿毒症毒素水平。次要疗效终点是比较治疗前后尿素、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、对甲酚、几丁质酶 3 样蛋白 1(YKL-40)、瘦素(LEP)、马尿酸(HPA)、三甲胺 N-氧化物(TMAO)、不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、成纤维细胞生长因子 23(FGF23)的水平。该研究还对单次 HFR 和 HDF 治疗的尿毒症毒素清除率进行了比较分析。同时,比较了单次 HFR 或 HDF 治疗前后血清白蛋白和支链氨基酸的水平。在安全性方面,该研究在整个研究过程中细致地记录了生命体征和不良事件的发生情况。
该研究纳入了 20 名患者。单次 HFR 治疗后,IS、λFLC、β-MG、IL-6、P-对甲酚、YKL-40、LEP、HPA、TMAO、ADMA、TNF-α和 FGF23 水平显著降低(所有 P 值均<0.001)。HFR 治疗后 λFLC、β-MG、IL-6、LEP 和 TNF-α 的清除率明显高于 HDF(值分别为 0.036、0.042、0.041、0.019 和 0.036)。与 HFR 治疗前和 HFR 治疗后相比,血清白蛋白、缬氨酸和异亮氨酸水平无显著差异(均>0.05),而 HDF 治疗后血清白蛋白水平显著降低(=0.000)。
HFR 治疗可有效清除 MHD 患者血液中的尿毒症毒素,特别是蛋白结合毒素和大中分子毒素。此外,它还保留了白蛋白和支链氨基酸等重要的生理化合物,突出了其良好的安全性。