Williams Scott C, Linske Megan A
Department of Environmental Science and Forestry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Center for Vector Biology & Zoonotic Diseases, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
J Med Entomol. 2024 Jul 12;61(4):965-974. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjae044.
Based on increases in reported cases of tick-borne illnesses, expanding ranges of native ticks, and repeated documentation of arrivals of nonnative tick species, there is a clear need for their effective management in the United States. Synthetic acaricides have proven efficacious in tick management, but real/perceived negative impacts to the environment and nontarget, beneficial insects must be addressed. We sought to determine whether late fall synthetic acaricide application, when most susceptible beneficial insects are presumably dormant or have migrated, could effectively manage host-seeking spring Ixodes scapularis Say abundances as compared to traditional spring application. We compared results of delivery of Demand CS (lambda-cyhalothrin) via truck-mounted high-pressure spray and powered backpack blower as well as delivery of granular Demand G to experimental control (water) in peridomestic habitats in fall 2021, spring 2022, and combined fall 2021/spring 2022. High-pressure fall delivery of Demand CS and backpack delivery of Demand G significantly reduced host-seeking adult I. scapularis abundances within-season and the following spring combined by 100% and 94%, respectively. No host-seeking nymphal I. scapularis were documented in spring after fall only, spring only, or fall and spring combined delivery of Demand CS via high-pressure or powered backpack blower. No adult I. scapularis were documented at any time posttreatment on locations that received high-pressure delivery of Demand CS. We conclude that high-pressure delivery of Demand CS in late fall successfully eliminated multiple stages of host-seeking I. scapularis through the following spring while likely limiting exposure of beneficial insects to synthetic pyrethroids.
基于蜱传播疾病报告病例的增加、本地蜱分布范围的扩大以及非本地蜱种传入的多次记录,美国显然需要对其进行有效管理。合成杀螨剂已被证明在蜱虫管理中有效,但必须解决对环境和非目标有益昆虫的实际/感知负面影响。我们试图确定,在大多数易感有益昆虫可能处于休眠或已迁徙的晚秋施用合成杀螨剂,与传统的春季施用相比,是否能有效控制春季寻找宿主的肩突硬蜱(Ixodes scapularis Say)的数量。我们比较了2021年秋季、2022年春季以及2021年秋季/2022年春季组合期,通过车载高压喷雾器和动力背负式吹风机施用敌杀死CS(高效氯氟氰菊酯)以及施用颗粒状敌杀死G与实验对照(水),在住宅周边栖息地的效果。秋季高压施用敌杀死CS和背负式施用敌杀死G分别使当季和次年春季寻找宿主的成年肩突硬蜱数量显著减少,减少幅度分别为100%和94%。仅在秋季、仅在春季或秋季与春季组合施用敌杀死CS后,通过高压或动力背负式吹风机施用,春季均未发现寻找宿主的肩突硬蜱若虫。在接受敌杀死CS高压施用的地点,处理后任何时间均未发现成年肩突硬蜱。我们得出结论,晚秋高压施用敌杀死CS成功消除了直至次年春季多个阶段寻找宿主的肩突硬蜱,同时可能限制了有益昆虫接触拟除虫菊酯类合成农药。