Am Nat. 2024 May;203(5):E157-E174. doi: 10.1086/729438. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
AbstractAssessing whether phenological shifts in response to climate change confer a fitness advantage requires investigating the relationships among phenology, fitness, and environmental drivers of selection. Despite widely documented advancements in phenology with warming climate, we lack empirical estimates of how selection on phenology varies in response to continuous climate drivers or how phenological shifts in response to warming conditions affect fitness. We leverage an unusual long-term dataset with repeated, individual measurements of phenology and reproduction in a long-lived alpine plant. We analyze phenotypic plasticity in flowering phenology in relation to two climate drivers, snowmelt timing and growing degree days (GDDs). Plants flower earlier with increased GDDs and earlier snowmelt, and directional selection also favors earlier flowering under these conditions. However, reproduction still declines with warming and early snowmelt, even when flowering is early. Furthermore, the steepness of this reproductive decline increases dramatically with warming conditions, resulting in very little fruit production regardless of flowering time once GDDs exceed approximately 225 degree days or snowmelt occurs before May 15. Even though advancing phenology confers a fitness advantage relative to stasis, these shifts are insufficient to maintain reproduction under warming, highlighting limits to the potential benefits of phenological plasticity under climate change.
评估对气候变化的物候反应是否赋予了适应优势,需要调查物候、适应性和选择的环境驱动因素之间的关系。尽管有广泛的记录表明气候变暖导致物候提前,但我们缺乏关于物候选择如何对连续的气候驱动因素做出响应以及对变暖条件的物候变化如何影响适应性的经验估计。我们利用一个不寻常的长期数据集,该数据集对一种长寿命高山植物的物候和繁殖进行了重复的个体测量。我们分析了开花物候与两个气候驱动因素(融雪时间和生长度日(GDD))之间的表型可塑性。植物在 GDD 增加和融雪提前的情况下更早开花,并且在这些条件下,定向选择也有利于更早开花。然而,即使在开花较早的情况下,繁殖仍然随着变暖和融雪提前而下降。此外,随着变暖条件的加剧,这种繁殖下降的陡峭程度急剧增加,导致一旦 GDD 超过约 225 个生长度日或融雪发生在 5 月 15 日之前,无论开花时间如何,果实产量都非常少。尽管提前物候相对于稳定状态赋予了适应性优势,但这些变化不足以在变暖条件下维持繁殖,突显了气候变化下物候可塑性的潜在益处的局限性。