Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, 21985, South Korea.
Center for Biosystems and Biotech Data Science, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, 21985, South Korea; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Food Microbiol. 2024 Aug;121:104516. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104516. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) is commonly used as a rapid measurement of the antimicrobial potential of free chlorine during industrial fresh produce washing. The current study tested the hypothesis that ORP can act as a "single variable" measurement of bacterial (vegetative and endospores) inactivation effectiveness with free chlorine irrespective of the water pH value. This situation has on occasion been assumed but never confirmed nor disproven. Chlorine-dosed pH 6.5 and 8.5 phosphate buffer solutions were inoculated with Escherichia coli (E. coli), Listeria innocua (L. innocua), or Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) endospores. ORP, free chlorine (FC), and log reduction were monitored after 5 s (for E. coli and L. innocua) and up to 30 min (for B. subtilis spores) of disinfection. Logistic and exponential models were developed to describe how bacteria reduction varied as a function of ORP at different pH levels. Validation tests were performed in phosphate buffered pH 6.5 and 8.5 cabbage wash water periodically dosed with FC, cabbage extract and a cocktail of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (E. coli O157:H7) and Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes). The built logistic and exponential models confirmed that at equal ORP values, the inactivation of the surrogate strains was not consistent across pH 6.5 and pH 8.5, with higher reductions at higher pH. This is the opposite of the well-known free chlorine-controlled bacterial inactivation, where the antibacterial effect is higher at lower pH. The validation test results indicated that in the cabbage wash water, the relationship between disinfection efficiency and ORP was consistent with the oxidant demand free systems. The study suggests that ORP cannot serve as a reliable single variable measurement to predict bacterial disinfection in buffered systems. When using ORP to monitor and control the antibacterial effectiveness of the chlorinated wash water, it is crucial to take into account (and control) the pH.
氧化还原电位(ORP)通常被用作工业新鲜农产品清洗过程中游离氯抗菌潜力的快速测量方法。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即 ORP 可以作为游离氯对细菌(营养体和芽孢)灭活效果的“单一变量”测量,而与水的 pH 值无关。这种情况有时被假定,但从未得到证实或否定。用大肠杆菌(E. coli)、无害李斯特菌(L. innocua)或枯草芽孢杆菌(B. subtilis)芽孢对 pH 值为 6.5 和 8.5 的氯处理磷酸盐缓冲液进行接种。在消毒 5 秒(针对 E. coli 和 L. innocua)和长达 30 分钟(针对 B. subtilis 孢子)后,监测 ORP、游离氯(FC)和对数减少。开发了逻辑斯蒂和指数模型来描述在不同 pH 水平下,细菌减少量如何随 ORP 变化而变化。在周期性用 FC、白菜提取物和大肠杆菌 O157:H7(E. coli O157:H7)和李斯特菌 monocytogenes(L. monocytogenes)鸡尾酒处理的 pH 6.5 和 8.5 白菜洗涤水中进行了验证试验。建立的逻辑斯蒂和指数模型证实,在相等的 ORP 值下,替代菌株在 pH 6.5 和 pH 8.5 之间的灭活不一致,在较高 pH 值下的减少更多。这与众所周知的游离氯控制细菌灭活相反,在较低 pH 值下,抗菌效果更高。验证试验结果表明,在白菜洗涤水中,消毒效率与 ORP 之间的关系与氧化剂需求自由系统一致。该研究表明,ORP 不能作为预测缓冲系统中细菌消毒的可靠单一变量测量。当使用 ORP 监测和控制氯洗水的抗菌效果时,必须考虑(并控制)pH 值。