, Exeter, UK.
Lundbeck Ltd, Watford, UK.
J Headache Pain. 2024 Apr 18;25(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01749-8.
Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease with a substantial societal burden due to lost productivity. From a societal perspective, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of migraine.
An individual patient simulation of discrete competing events was developed to evaluate eptinezumab cost-effectiveness compared to best supportive care for adults in the United Kingdom with ≥ 4 migraine days per month and prior failure of ≥ 3 preventive migraine treatments. Individuals with sampled baseline characteristics were created to represent this population, which comprised dedicated episodic and chronic migraine subpopulations. Clinical efficacy, utility, and work productivity inputs were based on results from the DELIVER randomised controlled trial (NCT04418765). Timing of natural history events and treatment holidays-informed by the literature-were simulated to unmask any natural improvement of the disease unrelated to treatment. The primary outcomes were monthly migraine days, migraine-associated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and net monetary benefit, each evaluated over a 5-year time horizon from 2020. Secondary analyses explored a lifetime horizon and an alternative treatment stopping rule.
Treatment with eptinezumab resulted in an average of 0.231 QALYs gained at a saving of £4,894 over 5 years, making eptinezumab dominant over best supportive care (i.e., better health outcomes and less costly). This result was confirmed by the probabilistic analysis and all alternative assumption scenarios under the same societal perspective. Univariate testing of inputs showed net monetary benefit was most sensitive to the number of days of productivity loss, and monthly salary.
This economic evaluation shows that from a societal perspective, eptinezumab is a cost-effective treatment in patients with ≥ 4 migraine days per month and for whom ≥ 3 other preventive migraine treatments have failed.
N/A.
偏头痛是一种高发的神经系统疾病,由于生产力的丧失,给社会带来了巨大的负担。从社会角度出发,我们评估了eptinezumab 用于预防偏头痛的成本效益。
我们开发了一种个体患者离散竞争事件模拟,以评估 eptinezumab 与最佳支持治疗相比在英国每月偏头痛发作天数≥4 且≥3 种预防偏头痛治疗失败的成年人中的成本效益。根据该人群的特征,创建了具有采样基线特征的个体,该人群包括专门的发作性和慢性偏头痛亚人群。临床疗效、效用和工作生产力投入均基于 DELIVER 随机对照试验(NCT04418765)的结果。根据文献模拟自然病史事件和治疗假期的时间,以揭示与治疗无关的任何疾病的自然改善。主要结局是每月偏头痛天数、偏头痛相关成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)、增量成本效益比和净货币收益,均在 2020 年的 5 年时间内评估。二次分析探索了终生和替代治疗停止规则。
使用 eptinezumab 治疗可平均获得 0.231 个 QALY,5 年内节省 4894 英镑,使 eptinezumab 优于最佳支持治疗(即更好的健康结果和更低的成本)。概率分析和同一社会视角下的所有替代假设方案均证实了这一结果。对投入的单变量测试表明,净货币收益对生产力损失天数和月薪最为敏感。
从社会角度来看,该经济评估表明,对于每月偏头痛发作天数≥4 且≥3 种其他预防偏头痛治疗失败的患者,eptinezumab 是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。
无。