Suppr超能文献

门诊与手术室:确定孕早期妊娠失败刮宫术的最佳实施场所

Clinic Versus the Operating Room: Determining the Optimal Setting for Dilation and Curettage for Management of First-Trimester Pregnancy Failure.

作者信息

Novatt Hilary, Rockhill Kari, Baker Kori, Stickrath Elaine, Alston Meredith, Fabbri Stefka

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.

Epidemiology and Public Health, Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Safety, Denver, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 19;16(3):e56490. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56490. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction There is no clear guidance for the optimal setting for dilation and curettage (D&C) for the management of first-trimester pregnancy failure. Identifying patients at risk of clinically significant blood loss at the time of D&C may inform a provider's decision regarding the setting for the procedure. We aimed to identify risk factors predictive for blood loss of 200mL or greater at the time of D&C. Methods  This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with first-trimester pregnancy failure at gestational age less than 11 weeks who underwent surgical management with D&C at a single safety net academic institution between 4/2016 and 4/2021. Patient characteristics and procedural outcomes were abstracted. Women with less than 200mL versus greater than or equal to 200mL blood loss were compared using descriptive statistics, chi-square for categorical variables, and Satterthwaite t-tests for continuous variables. Results A total of 350 patients were identified; 233 met inclusion criteria, and 228 had non-missing outcome data. Mean gestational age was 55 days (SD 9.4). Thirty-one percent (n=70) had estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥200mL. Younger patients (mean 28.7 years vs. 30.9, p=0.038), Latina patients (67.1% vs. 51.9%, p=0.006), patients with higher body mass index (BMI, mean 30.6 vs. 27.3 kg/m2, p=0.006), and patients with pregnancies at greater gestational age (59.5 days vs. 53.6 days, p<0.001) were more likely to have EBL ≥200mL. Additionally, patients with pregnancies dated by ultrasound (34.3% vs. 18.4%, p=0.007), those who underwent D&C in the operating room (81.4% vs. 48.7%, p<0.001), and those who underwent general anesthesia (81.4% vs. 44.3%, p<0.001) were more likely to have EBL ≥200mL. Discussion In this study, patients with EBL ≥200mL at the time of D&C differed significantly from those with EBL<200mL. This information can assist providers in planning the best setting for their patients' procedures.

摘要

引言 对于孕早期妊娠失败的处理,刮宫术(D&C)的最佳实施环境尚无明确指导。识别刮宫术时存在临床显著失血风险的患者,可能有助于医疗服务提供者做出关于手术实施环境的决策。我们旨在识别刮宫术时失血量达200毫升或更多的预测风险因素。

方法 这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为孕龄小于11周、被诊断为孕早期妊娠失败且于2016年4月至2021年4月在一家安全网学术机构接受刮宫术手术治疗的患者。提取了患者特征和手术结果。对失血量小于200毫升与大于或等于200毫升的女性患者,采用描述性统计、分类变量的卡方检验以及连续变量的萨特思韦特t检验进行比较。

结果 共识别出350例患者;233例符合纳入标准,228例有非缺失的结果数据。平均孕龄为55天(标准差9.4)。31%(n = 70)的患者估计失血量(EBL)≥200毫升。更年轻的患者(平均28.7岁对30.9岁,p = 0.038)、拉丁裔患者(67.1%对51.9%,p = 0.006)、体重指数(BMI)较高的患者(平均30.6对27.3kg/m²,p = 0.006)以及孕龄较大的患者(59.5天对53.6天,p < 0.001)更有可能EBL≥200毫升。此外,经超声确定孕周的患者(34.3%对18.4%,p = 0.007)、在手术室接受刮宫术的患者(81.4%对48.7%,p < 0.001)以及接受全身麻醉的患者(81.4%对44.3%,p < 0.001)更有可能EBL≥200毫升。

讨论 在本研究中,刮宫术时EBL≥200毫升的患者与EBL < 200毫升的患者有显著差异。这些信息可帮助医疗服务提供者为其患者的手术规划最佳实施环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f45/11026066/971a7bbe12d9/cureus-0016-00000056490-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验