• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国范围内微创食管切除术手术表现与患者结局的关联协会。

Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e246556. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6556.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6556
PMID:38639938
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031683/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Suboptimal surgical performance is hypothesized to be associated with less favorable patient outcomes in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Establishing this association may lead to programs that promote better surgical performance of MIE and improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between surgical performance and postoperative outcomes after MIE.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this nationwide cohort study of 15 Dutch hospitals that perform more than 20 MIEs per year, 7 masked expert MIE surgeons assessed surgical performance using videos and a previously developed and validated competency assessment tool (CAT). Each hospital submitted 2 representative videos of MIEs performed between November 4, 2021, and September 13, 2022. Patients registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were included to examine patient outcomes.

EXPOSURE

Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on their MIE-CAT performance score. Outcomes were compared between highest (top 25%) and lowest (bottom 25%) performing quartiles. Transthoracic MIE with gastric tube reconstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

The primary outcome was severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) within 30 days after surgery. Multilevel logistic regression, with clustering of patients within hospitals, was used to analyze associations between performance and outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 30 videos and 970 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [9.1] years; 719 men [74.1%]) were included. The mean (SD) MIE-CAT score was 113.6 (5.5) in the highest performance quartile vs 94.1 (5.9) in the lowest. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 18.7% (41 of 219) of patients in the highest performance quartile vs 39.2% (40 of 102) in the lowest (risk ratio [RR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99). The highest vs the lowest performance quartile showed lower rates of conversions (1.8% vs 8.9%; RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.21-0.21), intraoperative complications (2.7% vs 7.8%; RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04-0.94), and overall postoperative complications (46.1% vs 65.7%; RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96). The R0 resection rate (96.8% vs 94.2%; RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.05) and lymph node yield (mean [SD], 38.9 [14.7] vs 26.2 [9.0]; RR, 3.20; 95% CI, 0.27-3.21) increased with oncologic-specific performance (eg, hiatus dissection, lymph node dissection). In addition, a high anastomotic phase score was associated with a lower anastomotic leakage rate (4.6% vs 17.7%; RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.31).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that better surgical performance is associated with fewer perioperative complications for patients with esophageal cancer on a national level. If surgical performance of MIE can be improved with MIE-CAT implementation, substantially better patient outcomes may be achievable.

摘要

重要性

微创食管切除术(MIE)中较差的手术表现被假设与患者术后结果较差有关。确定这种关联可能会导致实施促进 MIE 手术表现更好和改善患者结果的方案。

目的

调查 MIE 后手术表现与术后结果之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项对每年进行超过 20 例 MIE 的 15 家荷兰医院的全国性队列研究中,7 名盲法 MIE 专家使用视频和先前开发和验证的能力评估工具(CAT)评估手术表现。每家医院提交了 2 例在 2021 年 11 月 4 日至 2022 年 9 月 13 日期间进行的 MIE 的代表性视频。包括 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间在荷兰上消化道癌症审计中注册的患者,以检查患者的结果。

暴露

根据 MIE-CAT 表现评分将医院分为四分位组。比较最高(前 25%)和最低(后 25%)四分位组之间的结果。经胸 MIE 加胃管重建。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是手术后 30 天内发生严重术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo ≥3)。使用多水平逻辑回归,对医院内的患者进行聚类分析,分析表现与结果之间的关联。

结果

共纳入 30 个视频和 970 例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,66.6[9.1]岁;719 名男性[74.1%])。最高表现四分位组的 MIE-CAT 评分平均(标准差)为 113.6(5.5),而最低表现四分位组为 94.1(5.9)。最高表现四分位组有 18.7%(41/219)的患者发生严重术后并发症,而最低表现四分位组有 39.2%(40/102)(风险比[RR],0.50;95%CI,0.24-0.99)。与最低四分位组相比,最高四分位组的转换率(1.8% vs 8.9%;RR,0.21;95%CI,0.21-0.21)、术中并发症(2.7% vs 7.8%;RR,0.21;95%CI,0.04-0.94)和总术后并发症(46.1% vs 65.7%;RR,0.54;95%CI,0.24-0.96)较低。R0 切除率(96.8% vs 94.2%;RR,1.03;95%CI,0.97-1.05)和淋巴结产量(平均值[标准差],38.9[14.7] vs 26.2[9.0];RR,3.20;95%CI,0.27-3.21)随着肿瘤特异性表现(例如,裂孔解剖、淋巴结清扫)的增加而增加。此外,吻合口阶段评分较高与吻合口漏发生率较低相关(4.6% vs 17.7%;RR,0.14;95%CI,0.06-0.31)。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,在全国范围内,更好的手术表现与食管癌患者围手术期并发症较少相关。如果 MIE-CAT 的实施可以提高 MIE 的手术表现,可能会实现更好的患者结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53e/11031683/235204537f0a/jamanetwopen-e246556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53e/11031683/c17a5cfa0556/jamanetwopen-e246556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53e/11031683/235204537f0a/jamanetwopen-e246556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53e/11031683/c17a5cfa0556/jamanetwopen-e246556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f53e/11031683/235204537f0a/jamanetwopen-e246556-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes.全国范围内微创食管切除术手术表现与患者结局的关联协会。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e246556. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6556.
2
A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.一种基于视频的微创食管切除术特定手术能力评估工具。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Mar 1;159(3):297-305. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6522.
3
The impact of hospital experience in bariatric surgery on short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a nationwide analysis.肥胖症手术中医院经验对微创食管切除术短期预后的影响:一项全国性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):720-734. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10560-6. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
4
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.食管癌颈部吻合术的微创与开放食管切除术比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3.
5
Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.与挽救性开放食管切除术相比,食管癌根治性放化疗后行挽救性微创食管切除术可改善术后并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3504-3510. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08672-y. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.微创食管切除术围手术期并发症的标准化比较:Ivor Lewis 与 McKeown 术式。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5660-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.机器人辅助与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管鳞状细胞癌:一项多中心随机对照试验的早期结果:RAMIE试验
Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):646-653. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005023.
8
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与杂交微创食管切除术:来自欧洲大容量中心的倾向评分匹配短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7747-7755. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09254-2. Epub 2022 May 3.
9
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].[微创Ivor-Lewis与微创McKeown食管癌切除术围手术期并发症的临床观察]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):577-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626.
10
Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.基于人群的前瞻性全国注册队列研究:与开胸经胸食管癌切除术相比,微创治疗食管癌的长期生存更好。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;29(9):5609-5621. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11922-5. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Caseload per Year in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Narrative Review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术的年度病例量:一项叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;16(20):3538. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203538.

本文引用的文献

1
A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.一种基于视频的微创食管切除术特定手术能力评估工具。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Mar 1;159(3):297-305. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6522.
2
Automatic Surgical Skill Assessment System Based on Concordance of Standardized Surgical Field Development Using Artificial Intelligence.基于人工智能标准化手术视野开发一致性的自动手术技能评估系统。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):e231131. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1131. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Using Artificial Intelligence to Assess Surgeon Skill.
利用人工智能评估外科医生的技能。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):e231140. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1140. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Introduction of Minimally Invasive transCervical oEsophagectomy (MICE) according to the IDEAL framework.根据IDEAL框架介绍微创经颈食管切除术(MICE)。
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1096-1099. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad079.
5
Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score.食管切除术后患者食管吻合口漏的严重程度:SEAL 评分。
Br J Surg. 2022 Aug 16;109(9):864-871. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac226.
6
Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于视频的外科住院医师培训:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1429-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09379-4. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
The association between video-based assessment of intraoperative technical performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.基于术中技术表现的视频评估与患者结局之间的关联:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):7938-7948. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09296-6. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
Response to the Comment on "Learning Curves of Ivor Lewis Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy by Hospital and Surgeon Characteristics a Retrospective Multi-national Cohort Study".对《根据医院和外科医生特征分析艾弗·刘易斯完全微创食管切除术的学习曲线:一项回顾性多国队列研究》评论的回应
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e930. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005147.
9
European consensus on essential steps of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown Esophagectomy through Delphi methodology.欧洲共识:通过德尔菲法确定微创 Ivor Lewis 和 McKeown 食管癌切除术的基本步骤。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):446-460. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08304-5. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
Associations Between Video Evaluations of Surgical Technique and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.手术技术视频评估与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术结局的相关性。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):e205532. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5532. Epub 2021 Feb 10.