Resident.
Assistant Professor.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2024 Apr;79(4):233-241. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001253.
Macrosomia represents the most significant risk factor of shoulder dystocia (SD), which is a severe and emergent complication of vaginal delivery. They are both associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published influential guidelines on the diagnosis and management of fetal macrosomia and SD.
A comparative review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), and the Department for Health and Wellbeing of the Government of South Australia on macrosomia and SD was conducted.
The ACOG and RANZCOG agree that macrosomia should be defined as birthweight above 4000-4500 g regardless of the gestational age, whereas the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence defines macrosomia as an estimated fetal weight above the 95th percentile. According to ACOG and RANZCOG, ultrasound scans and clinical estimates can be used to rule out fetal macrosomia, although lacking accuracy. Routine induction of labor before 39 weeks of gestation with the sole indication of suspected fetal macrosomia is unanimously not recommended, but an individualized counseling should be provided. Exercise, appropriate diet, and prepregnancy bariatric surgery are mentioned as preventive measures. There is also consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the definition and the diagnosis of SD, with the "turtle sign" being the most common sign for its recognition as well as the poor predictability of the reported risk factors. Moreover, there is an overall agreement on the algorithm of SD management with McRoberts technique suggested as first-line maneuver. In addition, appropriate staff training, thorough documentation, and time keeping are crucial aspects of SD management according to all medical societies. Elective delivery for the prevention of SD is discouraged by all the reviewed guidelines.
Macrosomia is associated not only with SD but also with maternal and neonatal complications. Similarly, SD can lead to permanent neurologic sequalae, as well as perinatal death if managed in a suboptimal way. Therefore, it is crucial to develop consistent international practice protocols for their prompt diagnosis and effective management in order to safely guide clinical practice and improve pregnancy outcomes.
巨大儿是肩难产(shoulder dystocia,SD)的最重要危险因素,SD 是阴道分娩的严重且紧急的并发症。两者均与不良妊娠结局相关。
本研究旨在综述并比较最近发布的关于胎儿巨大儿和 SD 诊断和管理的有影响力的指南。
对美国妇产科医师学会(American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,ACOG)、英国皇家妇产科医师学院(Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists)、英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,NICE)、澳大利亚和新西兰皇家妇产科医师学院(Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,RANZCOG)以及南澳大利亚州卫生部发布的关于巨大儿和 SD 的指南进行了比较性综述。
ACOG 和 RANZCOG 均认为,无论胎龄如何,巨大儿均应定义为出生体重>4000-4500g,而 NICE 将巨大儿定义为估计胎儿体重超过第 95 百分位数。根据 ACOG 和 RANZCOG,超声扫描和临床估计可用于排除巨大儿,但准确性欠佳。一致不建议仅因疑似巨大儿而在 39 孕周前常规引产,但应提供个体化咨询。运动、适当饮食和孕前减重手术被提及为预防措施。被综述的指南在 SD 的定义和诊断方面也达成共识,“海龟征”是其最常见的识别标志,且报道的危险因素预测性较差。此外,在 SD 管理的算法方面也达成了总体共识,建议 McRoberts 技术作为一线操作。另外,所有医学协会均认为,适当的人员培训、全面的文件记录和时间管理是 SD 管理的重要方面。所有被综述的指南均不建议为预防 SD 而行择期分娩。
巨大儿不仅与 SD 相关,还与母婴和新生儿并发症相关。同样,SD 可导致永久性神经后遗症,若处理不当,还会导致围产儿死亡。因此,制定一致的国际实践方案来快速诊断和有效管理巨大儿和 SD 至关重要,以安全指导临床实践并改善妊娠结局。