Department of Veterinary Clinics and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 19;19(4):e0302317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302317. eCollection 2024.
Animal welfare encompasses the overall well-being of an animal, spanning both its physical and mental health, assessable through potential measurements. It stands in contrast to mistreatment, which involves actions, direct or indirect, that endanger an animal's well-being. This study sought to appraise the factors influencing the Brazilian population's understanding of dog welfare and mistreatment. The survey questions were adapted from the Animal Welfare Examination Protocol, utilized by veterinarians to evaluate suspected passive abuse cases in dogs. Out of 1377 responses, 1353 were valid and analyzed. Among the 19 assessed indicators, 15 demonstrated an adequate response rate surpassing 90% of all 1353 responses. However, for three questions related to comfort, a smaller yet notable percentage of responses were only minimally adequate. Moreover, in one question within the comfort assessment, 186 participants (13.74%) provided inadequate responses. This implies that these people could potentially subject animals to a state of low Animal Welfare. Lack of knowledge emerged as a potential root of passive abuse, specifically negligence. In the assessment of nutritional indicators, water supply and quality received unanimous adequate responses. In evaluating comfort perceptions, significant associations were noted between gender, dog ownership, family income, and responses regarding resting surface. Regarding health indicators, the majority responded appropriately. Female gender and dog ownership correlated with providing the appropriate response, while not owning a dog was associated with minimally adequate responses. In the context of comfort indicators, "Hitting the Dog" also demonstrated an association with gender, with females tending towards appropriate responses. Given the lack of significant correlation between educational levels and the most suitable responses, it underscores the urgency of implementing environmental education programs in schools with a focus on animal protection.
动物福利涵盖了动物的整体福祉,包括其身体和心理健康,可通过潜在的测量来评估。它与虐待行为形成对比,虐待行为涉及直接或间接危及动物福祉的行为。本研究旨在评估影响巴西人口对犬只福利和虐待行为理解的因素。调查问卷改编自兽医用于评估犬只疑似被动虐待案件的动物福利检查协议。在 1377 份回复中,有 1353 份是有效的并进行了分析。在所评估的 19 个指标中,有 15 个指标的回复率达到了 90%以上,表现出了足够的回复率。然而,有三个与舒适度相关的问题,只有微不足道的回复率达到了最小的足够水平。此外,在舒适度评估的一个问题中,有 186 名参与者(13.74%)的回复是不充分的。这意味着这些人可能会让动物处于低动物福利状态。缺乏知识是被动虐待,特别是疏忽的潜在根源。在营养指标评估中,水的供应和质量得到了一致的充分回复。在评估舒适度感知时,性别、犬只拥有、家庭收入与关于休息表面的回复之间存在显著关联。在健康指标评估中,大多数人都做出了适当的回复。女性和犬只拥有与提供适当的回复相关,而不拥有犬只则与最小适当的回复相关。在舒适度指标方面,“打狗狗”也与性别有关,女性更倾向于做出适当的回复。考虑到教育水平与最适合的回复之间缺乏显著相关性,这突显了在学校实施以动物保护为重点的环境教育计划的紧迫性。