Chen Yu-An, Chu Huang-Hsi, Wang Chih-Li
National Chung Hsing University, 34916, Department of Plant Pathology, Taichung, Taiwan;
National Chung Hsing University, Department of Plant Pathology, 145 Xingda Rd., Taichung, Taiwan, 40227;
Plant Dis. 2024 Apr 19. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-24-0350-PDN.
Spinach () is a commonly used green vegetable. During September and October in both 2022 and 2023, a vegetable nursery company located among paddy rice fields in Taichung City, Taiwan, reported significant failures in spinach seedling production in net-houses with mean outdoor temperatures of 28.7℃. Abnormal growth was observed in approximately 30% of the spinach seedlings in each batch (n = 2,000 to 3,000), with aboveground tissues showing stunting, yellowing, and wilt, and underground tissues displaying root rot. The symptoms resembled the spinach damping-off documented in Taiwan in extension articles but which lacked complete pathogen identification. A total of 110 plants from two batches were used for pathogen isolation by placing roots on water agar incubated at 25℃ or were examined for the presence of oospores in diseased roots. Eighty-one percent of these plants were associated with . Nine isolates were used in subsequent analyses. Genomic DNA from these isolates was subjected to amplification of ITS, β-tubulin gene (TUB2), and cytochrome C oxidase subunit Ⅱ (COXII) gene with primer pairs ITS1 / ITS4, BT5 / BT6, and FM58 / FM66 (Villa et al. 2006). Sequences of ITS (PP209187-PP209195), TUB2 (PP212864-PP212872), and COXII (PP212855-PP212863) were deposited in GenBank. Four isolates (sp01, sp02, sp03, and sp04) were 100% identical to the neotype strain (CBS 118.80) of (Edson) Fitzp. for the ITS (761 bp), TUB2 (583 bp), and COXII (547 bp). Five isolates (2sp, 3sp, ND2-4sp, D3-4sp, and ND3-3sp) were 99.87%, 100%, and 99% identical to the reference strain (CBS 254.70) of Drechsler for the ITS (762 bp), TUB2 (602 bp), and COXII (556 bp), respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of isolates inferred from concatenated sequences of the three genes (LéVesque and De Cock 2004; Villa et al. 2006) revealed that the same four isolates grouped with the neotype strain of , and the five isolates clustered with the reference strain of , each with a 100% bootstrap support. Morphological features of isolates ND3-3sp and sp01 were used for identification. Isolate ND3-3sp produced inflated lobulate sporangia and aplerotic and smooth oospores (16.3 to 25.1 um; n = 30) attached with three to five antheridia, consistent with identification as . Isolate sp01 produced inflated lobulate sporangia and aplerotic and smooth oospores (17.0 to 24.0 um; n= 30) attached with a single intercalary antheridium, agreeing with the morphology of (Van der Plaats-Niterink 1981). To investigate the pathogenicity of the nine isolates on spinach, 20 mycelial agar discs (4 mm in diameter) from a 2-day-old V8 culture of each isolate were used to induce sporangia and zoospores in 20 ml sterilized water at 25℃ with a 12 h light / dark regime. A 1.5 ml zoospore suspension (6 × 103 zoospores / ml) was dropped into BVB growth substrate of two spinach seedlings in 2-week-old at 25℃ with 12 h light / dark regime, resulting in symptoms resembling those observed in commercial nurseries at 7 days post-inoculation (dpi). Each isolate inoculated 20 seedlings in 10 cells of a planting tray. At 14 dpi, disease incidences were 95 to 100% for isolates and 60 to 85% for isolates, while control plants treated with water showed no symptoms. Re-isolated pathogens from the inoculated plants were morphologically identical to the inoculated isolates, completing Koch's postulates. Results of the pathogenicity assay, along with molecular and morphological identification, conclude that the root rot of spinach was caused by and . The two oomycetes were not formally documented to cause spinach diseases in Taiwan. Although has been isolated from spinach (Wang et al. 2003), its pathogenicity to spinach was not documented worldwide. Root rot of spinach caused by has been reported in the United States (Bates and Stanghellini 1984), Korea (Cho and Shin 2004), and Italy (Garibaldi et al. 2015). These pathogens thrive in humid and hot weather (Littrell and McCarter, 1970). Producing spinach in cooler weather or in a temperature-controlled environment may help prevent severe occurrence of the disease.
菠菜()是一种常用的绿色蔬菜。在2022年和2023年的9月和10月期间,台湾台中市一家位于稻田中的蔬菜育苗公司报告称,在平均室外温度为28.7℃的网室内,菠菜育苗出现了严重失败。每批(n = 2000至3000株)菠菜幼苗中约30%出现异常生长,地上组织表现为生长受阻、发黄和枯萎,地下组织则出现根腐病。这些症状与台湾推广文章中记载的菠菜猝倒病相似,但缺乏完整的病原菌鉴定。从两批共110株植物上采集根部,置于25℃培养的水琼脂上进行病原菌分离,或检查病株根部是否存在卵孢子。其中81%的植物与 有关。选取9个 分离株用于后续分析。使用引物对ITS1 / ITS4、BT5 / BT6和FM58 / FM66(Villa等人,2006)对这些分离株的基因组DNA进行ITS、β - 微管蛋白基因(TUB2)和细胞色素C氧化酶亚基Ⅱ(COXII)基因的扩增。ITS(PP209187 - PP209195)、TUB2(PP212864 - PP212872)和COXII(PP212855 - PP212863)的序列已存入GenBank。4个分离株(sp01、sp02、sp03和sp04)的ITS(761 bp)、TUB2(583 bp)和COXII(547 bp)与 (Edson)Fitzp.的新模式菌株(CBS 118.80)100%相同。5个分离株(2sp、3sp、ND2 - 4sp、D3 - 4sp和ND3 - 3sp)的ITS(762 bp)、TUB2(602 bp)和COXII(556 bp)分别与德氏腐霉参考菌株(CBS 254.70)的相似度为99.87%、100%和99%。根据三个基因的串联序列推断的 分离株的系统发育分析(LéVesque和De Cock,2004;Villa等人,2006)表明,相同的4个分离株与 的新模式菌株聚类,5个分离株与 的参考菌株聚类,每个聚类的自展支持率均为100%。使用分离株ND3 - 3sp和sp01的形态特征进行鉴定。分离株ND3 - 3sp产生膨大的叶状孢子囊和无乳突且光滑的卵孢子(16.3至25.1微米;n = 30),附着有三到五个雄器,符合 的鉴定特征。分离株sp01产生膨大的叶状孢子囊和无乳突且光滑的卵孢子(17.0至24.0微米;n = 30),附着有单个间生雄器,与 的形态一致(Van der Plaats - Niterink,1981)。为了研究9个 分离株对菠菜的致病性,从每个分离株2天龄的V8培养基中取20个直径4毫米的菌丝琼脂圆盘,在25℃、12小时光照/黑暗条件下,于20毫升灭菌水中诱导产生孢子囊和游动孢子。将1.5毫升游动孢子悬浮液(6×10³个游动孢子/毫升)滴入2周龄、处于25℃、12小时光照/黑暗条件下的两棵菠菜幼苗的BVB生长基质中,接种后7天出现了与商业苗圃中观察到的症状相似的症状。每个 分离株接种种植盘中10个单元格中的20株幼苗。接种后14天, 分离株的发病率为95%至100%, 分离株的发病率为60%至85%,而用水处理的对照植株未出现症状。从接种植株重新分离出的病原菌在形态上与接种的分离株相同,完成了柯赫氏法则验证。致病性测定结果以及分子和形态鉴定结果表明,菠菜根腐病是由 和 引起的。这两种卵菌在台湾尚未被正式记载可导致菠菜病害。尽管 已从菠菜中分离出来(Wang等人,2003),但其对菠菜致病性在全球范围内尚未见记载。在美国(Bates和Stanghellini,1984)、韩国(Cho和Shin,2004)以及意大利(Garibaldi等人,2015)均有由 引起菠菜根腐病的报道。这些病原菌在潮湿炎热的天气中生长旺盛(Littrell和McCarter,1970)。在较凉爽的天气或温度控制环境中种植菠菜可能有助于预防该病的严重发生。