• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝门部胆管癌Ⅱ型行肝部分切除联合胆管整形和胆肠吻合术的疗效分析:倾向评分匹配研究

Minor hepatectomy combined with cholangioplasty and cholangiojejunostomy for Bismuth II hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 1 Minde Road, Nanchang, 330006, China.

Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 1 Minde Road, Nanchang, 330006, China; Department of Emergency Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;50(6):108339. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108339. Epub 2024 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108339
PMID:38640604
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for Bismuth II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) remains controversial. This study compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between minor and major hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventeen patients with Bismuth II HCCA who underwent hepatectomy and cholangiojejunostomy between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Propensity score matching created a cohort of 62 patients who underwent minor (n = 31) or major (n = 31) hepatectomy. Perioperative outcomes, complications, quality of life, and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. Continuous data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, categorical variables are presented as n (%).

RESULTS

Minor hepatectomy had a significantly shorter operation time (245.42 ± 54.31 vs. 282.16 ± 66.65 min; P = 0.023), less intraoperative blood loss (194.19 ± 149.17 vs. 315.81 ± 256.80 mL; P = 0.022), a lower transfusion rate (4 vs. 11 patients; P = 0.038), more rapid bowel recovery (17.77 ± 10.00 vs. 24.94 ± 9.82 h; P = 0.005), and a lower incidence of liver failure (1 vs. 6 patients; P = 0.045). There were no significant between-group differences in wound infection, bile leak, bleeding, pulmonary infection, intra-abdominal fluid collection, and complication rates. Postoperative laboratory values, length of hospital stay, quality of life scores, 3-year overall survival (25.8 % vs. 22.6 %; P = 0.648), and 3-year disease-free survival (12.9 % vs. 16.1 %; P = 0.989) were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this propensity score-matched analysis, overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable between minor and major hepatectomy in selected patients with Bismuth II HCCA. Minor hepatectomy was associated with a shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less need for transfusion, more rapid bowel recovery, and a lower incidence of liver failure. Besides, this findings need confirmation in a large-scale, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial with longer-term follow-up.

摘要

背景

对于Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌(HCCA),最佳的手术入路仍存在争议。本研究比较了小肝切除术和大肝切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受肝切除术和胆肠吻合术的 117 例Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌患者。通过倾向评分匹配创建了一个由 62 例患者组成的队列,他们接受了小(n=31)或大(n=31)肝切除术。比较两组患者的围手术期结果、并发症、生活质量和生存结果。连续数据表示为平均值±标准差,分类变量表示为 n(%)。

结果

小肝切除术的手术时间明显更短(245.42±54.31 分钟 vs. 282.16±66.65 分钟;P=0.023),术中出血量更少(194.19±149.17 毫升 vs. 315.81±256.80 毫升;P=0.022),输血率更低(4 例 vs. 11 例;P=0.038),肠道恢复更快(17.77±10.00 小时 vs. 24.94±9.82 小时;P=0.005),肝功能衰竭发生率更低(1 例 vs. 6 例;P=0.045)。两组间在伤口感染、胆漏、出血、肺部感染、腹腔积液和并发症发生率方面无显著差异。术后实验室值、住院时间、生活质量评分、3 年总生存率(25.8% vs. 22.6%;P=0.648)和 3 年无病生存率(12.9% vs. 16.1%;P=0.989)无差异。

结论

在本倾向评分匹配分析中,在选择的Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌患者中,小肝切除术和大肝切除术的总生存率和无病生存率相当。小肝切除术与手术时间更短、术中失血量更少、输血需求更少、肠道恢复更快、肝功能衰竭发生率更低有关。此外,这些发现需要在具有长期随访的大型、多中心、前瞻性随机对照试验中进一步证实。

相似文献

1
Minor hepatectomy combined with cholangioplasty and cholangiojejunostomy for Bismuth II hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.肝门部胆管癌Ⅱ型行肝部分切除联合胆管整形和胆肠吻合术的疗效分析:倾向评分匹配研究
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;50(6):108339. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108339. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
Left hepatectomy combined with hepatic artery resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.左半肝切除术联合肝动脉切除治疗肝门部胆管癌:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.038. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
3
Major hepatectomy in Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma.针对Bismuth I型和II型肝门部胆管癌的扩大肝切除术
J Surg Res. 2015 Mar;194(1):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
4
Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.全腹腔镜与开腹根治性切除术治疗肝门部胆管癌的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4382-4387. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07211-0. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
5
Laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: 3-year outcomes of a cohort study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌:倾向评分匹配队列研究的 3 年结果。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;33:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
Evaluation of the outcomes of biliary-enteric reconstruction in robotic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助肝门部胆管癌根治术中胆肠重建效果的评估:单中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 27;14(1):14836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65875-8.
7
[Minor liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ and Ⅳ].[Bismuth-CorletteⅢ型和Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌的肝部分切除术]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 1;57(7):523-526. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.07.009.
8
Laparoscopic resection for Bismuth type III and IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: How to improve the radicality without direct palpation.腹腔镜下切除Ⅲ型和Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌:如何在不直接触诊的情况下提高根治性。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;120(8):1379-1385. doi: 10.1002/jso.25739. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
[Effects of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage on surgical treatment of type Ⅲ and Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma].[术前经皮经肝胆道引流对Ⅲ型和Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌手术治疗的影响]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 1;57(4):288-292. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.04.009.
10
Surgical Strategies for Bismuth Type I and II Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact on Long-Term Outcomes.肝门部胆管癌Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型的外科治疗策略:对长期预后的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Dec;25(12):3084-3091. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05049-3. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Pattern and extent of intrahepatic infiltration of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma - a case-control study based on liver panoramic digital pathology.肝门部胆管癌肝内浸润的模式与范围——一项基于肝脏全景数字病理学的病例对照研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):31-39. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002040.