Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2024 Jul-Aug;13(4):254-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
There has been an increase in endoscopic and bronchoscopic biopsies as minimally invasive methods to obtain specimens from gastrointestinal (GI) or pancreatobiliary lesions and thoracic or mediastinal lesions, respectively. As hospitals undertake more of these procedures, it is important to consider the staffing implications that this has on cytopathology laboratories with respect to support for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).
Volume and time data from endoscopic ultrasound and bronchoscopic procedures (including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirations and small biopsies with touch preparation) in the GI suite, bronchoscopy suite, or operating room were reviewed for 2 months at 2 different medical centers with ROSE services provided by cytologists or fellows physically present at the procedure and cytopathologists located remotely using telecytology. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate significant trends based on the location of the biopsies and other factors.
A total of 16 proceduralists performed 159 procedures and submitted 276 different specimens during 16 total weeks at 2 institutions. The total ROSE time for the on-site personnel to cover these procedures was 109.3 hours (bronchoscopy, 62.3 hours [57%]; GI, 29.8 hours [27%]; OR, 17.2 hours [16%]), which represents an average of 0.69 hour (41.4 minutes) per procedure or 0.40 hour (24.0 minutes) per part, with the shortest procedure times per sample recorded during bronchoscopy. When stratified by practice volume for individual proceduralists, the average time per specimen sample submitted was shorter for proceduralists with high volume practices and was most pronounced during bronchoscopy procedures.
Endoscopic and bronchoscopic procedures account for an increasing amount of the ROSE time for the cytology team. On average, each ROSE procedure takes 0.69 hour (41.4 minutes) or approximately 0.40 hour (24.0 minutes) per specimen, with shorter time requirements for specimens obtained in bronchoscopy procedures and for operators with high volume practices for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirations. This provides important benchmarking data to calculate staffing needs for cytology to provide ROSE support for different proceduralists.
内镜和支气管镜活检作为获取胃肠道 (GI) 或胰胆病变以及胸或纵隔病变标本的微创方法,其数量有所增加。随着医院开展更多此类操作,考虑到这对细胞学实验室在快速现场评估 (ROSE) 方面的人员配备所产生的影响非常重要。
在 2 家不同的医疗中心,回顾了 2 个月内胃肠套房、支气管镜套房或手术室中进行的内镜超声和支气管镜程序(包括经支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检和小活检伴触诊制备)的量和时间数据,这些程序均由现场的细胞病理学家或研究员以及远程使用远程细胞学的细胞病理学家提供 ROSE 服务。进行了统计分析,以根据活检的位置和其他因素调查显著趋势。
共有 16 名介入医师在 2 家机构的 16 周内共进行了 159 次操作并提交了 276 个不同的标本。现场人员覆盖这些操作的总 ROSE 时间为 109.3 小时(支气管镜检查,62.3 小时 [57%];GI,29.8 小时 [27%];OR,17.2 小时 [16%]),平均每次操作 0.69 小时(41.4 分钟)或每次操作 0.40 小时(24.0 分钟),记录的最短操作时间为支气管镜检查。按个别介入医师的实践量分层,提交的标本样本的平均时间对于实践量较高的介入医师较短,在支气管镜检查过程中最为明显。
内镜和支气管镜检查程序占细胞学团队 ROSE 时间的比例越来越大。平均而言,每个 ROSE 操作需要 0.69 小时(41.4 分钟)或大约 0.40 小时(24.0 分钟)的时间,支气管镜检查中获得的标本和进行高容量操作的操作者的时间要求较短经支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检。这为计算细胞学人员配备需求提供了重要的基准数据,以支持不同介入医师的 ROSE。