• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偶然出现的积极情绪是否会诱导人们对决策结果产生更乐观的期望?一项源于事件相关电位的实证研究。

Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential.

机构信息

Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Think Tank Alliance of China Education Modernization Research and Evaluation Center, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2024 Apr;14(4):e3491. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3491.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.3491
PMID:38641887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031635/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous research has found that incidental emotions of different valences (positive/negative/neutral) influence risky decision-making. However, the mechanism of their influence on psychological expectations of decision outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

We explored the effects of different incidental emotions on the behavioral, psychological, and electrophysiological responses of individuals in risky decision-making through a money gambling task using a one-way (emotion type: positive, negative, neutral emotions) between-subjects experimental design.

RESULTS

Individuals with positive emotions had significantly greater risk-seeking rates than those with negative emotions during the decision selection phase (p < .01). In the feedback stage of decision outcomes, individuals showed stronger perceptions of uncertainty in the decision environment under gain and loss feedback compared with neutral feedback, as evidenced by a more positive P2 component (i.e., the second positive component of an event-related potential). Positive emotions produced greater than expected outcome bias than neutral emotions, as evidenced by a more negative FRN component (i.e., the feedback-related negativity component).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that positive emotions increase individuals' psychological expectations of decision outcomes. This study provides new empirical insights to understand the influence of incidental emotions on risky decision outcome expectations.

摘要

简介

先前的研究发现,不同效价(正/负/中性)的偶然情绪会影响风险决策。然而,它们对决策结果心理预期的影响机制尚不清楚。

方法

我们通过使用一种单向(情绪类型:正、负、中性情绪)被试间实验设计的金钱赌博任务,探讨了不同偶然情绪对个体在风险决策中行为、心理和电生理反应的影响。

结果

在决策选择阶段,具有正情绪的个体比具有负情绪的个体具有更高的风险寻求率(p<.01)。在决策结果的反馈阶段,与中性反馈相比,个体在收益和损失反馈下对决策环境的不确定性有更强的感知,这表现为更积极的 P2 成分(即事件相关电位的第二个正成分)。与中性情绪相比,正情绪产生的结果偏差大于预期,这表现为更负的 FRN 成分(即反馈相关负性成分)。

结论

我们的结果表明,积极情绪会增加个体对决策结果的心理预期。本研究为理解偶然情绪对风险决策结果预期的影响提供了新的实证见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/e8b8550bd0c6/BRB3-14-e3491-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/7f517fbd7fd6/BRB3-14-e3491-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/a26f9626958c/BRB3-14-e3491-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/2cc7784adddf/BRB3-14-e3491-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/b11f62547c87/BRB3-14-e3491-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/2df7c67018aa/BRB3-14-e3491-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/e8b8550bd0c6/BRB3-14-e3491-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/7f517fbd7fd6/BRB3-14-e3491-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/a26f9626958c/BRB3-14-e3491-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/2cc7784adddf/BRB3-14-e3491-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/b11f62547c87/BRB3-14-e3491-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/2df7c67018aa/BRB3-14-e3491-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ad/11031635/e8b8550bd0c6/BRB3-14-e3491-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential.偶然出现的积极情绪是否会诱导人们对决策结果产生更乐观的期望?一项源于事件相关电位的实证研究。
Brain Behav. 2024 Apr;14(4):e3491. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3491.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Acute Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Risky Decision Making and Reward Processing in Young Adults.有氧运动对年轻人风险决策和奖励处理的急性影响。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Mar;62(3):e70029. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70029.
4
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
9
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
10
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotion-related impulsivity and risky decision-making: A systematic review and meta-regression.情绪相关冲动性与冒险决策:系统评价与元回归分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;100:102232. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102232. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
2
Intolerance of uncertainty and neural measures of anticipation and reactivity for affective stimuli.对不确定性的不耐受以及对情感刺激的预期和反应的神经测量
Int J Psychophysiol. 2023 Jan;183:138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
3
The influence of prepaid service and promotion purchase restriction on consumers' willingness to share in tourism and hospitality: from the perspective of framing effect theory.
预付费服务和促销购买限制对消费者在旅游和酒店业分享意愿的影响:基于框架效应理论的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 26;13:1022312. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022312. eCollection 2022.
4
Money priming enhances sensitivity to the outcome feedback of decision-making under uncertainty: Evidence from an ERP study.金钱启动增强了对不确定决策结果反馈的敏感性:来自 ERP 研究的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Nov 5;176:108390. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108390. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
5
Age Differences in the Tradeoff between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control in Emotional Information Processing.情绪信息处理中主动与反应性认知控制权衡的年龄差异
Brain Sci. 2022 Aug 5;12(8):1043. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081043.
6
The cortisol awakening response and the late positive potentials evoked by unpleasant emotional pictures in healthy adults.健康成年人的皮质醇觉醒反应和不愉快情绪图片诱发的晚期正性电位。
Stress. 2022 Jan;25(1):40-47. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2021.2008902. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
7
How Does Information Overload Affect Consumers' Online Decision Process? An Event-Related Potentials Study.信息过载如何影响消费者的在线决策过程?一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 21;15:695852. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.695852. eCollection 2021.
8
Emotion regulation and decision-making in persons with dementia: A scoping review.痴呆症患者的情绪调节和决策:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2021 Jul;20(5):1832-1854. doi: 10.1177/1471301220971630. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
9
Neurocognitive underpinnings of cross-cultural differences in risky decision making.跨文化风险决策差异的神经认知基础。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jul 30;15(6):671-680. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa078.
10
How do different kinds of incidental emotions influence risk decision making?不同类型的偶然情绪如何影响风险决策?
Biol Psychol. 2020 Jul;154:107920. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107920. Epub 2020 Jun 11.