Jing Hengyi School of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Think Tank Alliance of China Education Modernization Research and Evaluation Center, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Brain Behav. 2024 Apr;14(4):e3491. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3491.
Previous research has found that incidental emotions of different valences (positive/negative/neutral) influence risky decision-making. However, the mechanism of their influence on psychological expectations of decision outcomes remains unclear.
We explored the effects of different incidental emotions on the behavioral, psychological, and electrophysiological responses of individuals in risky decision-making through a money gambling task using a one-way (emotion type: positive, negative, neutral emotions) between-subjects experimental design.
Individuals with positive emotions had significantly greater risk-seeking rates than those with negative emotions during the decision selection phase (p < .01). In the feedback stage of decision outcomes, individuals showed stronger perceptions of uncertainty in the decision environment under gain and loss feedback compared with neutral feedback, as evidenced by a more positive P2 component (i.e., the second positive component of an event-related potential). Positive emotions produced greater than expected outcome bias than neutral emotions, as evidenced by a more negative FRN component (i.e., the feedback-related negativity component).
Our results suggest that positive emotions increase individuals' psychological expectations of decision outcomes. This study provides new empirical insights to understand the influence of incidental emotions on risky decision outcome expectations.
先前的研究发现,不同效价(正/负/中性)的偶然情绪会影响风险决策。然而,它们对决策结果心理预期的影响机制尚不清楚。
我们通过使用一种单向(情绪类型:正、负、中性情绪)被试间实验设计的金钱赌博任务,探讨了不同偶然情绪对个体在风险决策中行为、心理和电生理反应的影响。
在决策选择阶段,具有正情绪的个体比具有负情绪的个体具有更高的风险寻求率(p<.01)。在决策结果的反馈阶段,与中性反馈相比,个体在收益和损失反馈下对决策环境的不确定性有更强的感知,这表现为更积极的 P2 成分(即事件相关电位的第二个正成分)。与中性情绪相比,正情绪产生的结果偏差大于预期,这表现为更负的 FRN 成分(即反馈相关负性成分)。
我们的结果表明,积极情绪会增加个体对决策结果的心理预期。本研究为理解偶然情绪对风险决策结果预期的影响提供了新的实证见解。