• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕早期联合筛查与非典型染色体畸变的侵入性诊断:丹麦全国范围内关于产前特征及检测与无创产前检测对比的研究

Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT.

作者信息

Gadsbøll K, Vogel I, Kristensen S E, Pedersen L H, Hyett J, Petersen O B

机构信息

Center for Fetal Medicine, Pregnancy and Ultrasound, Department of Gynecology, Fertility, and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.27667. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1002/uog.27667
PMID:38642365
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to examine the prenatal profiles of pregnancies affected by an atypical chromosomal aberration, focusing on pathogenic copy-number variants (pCNVs). We also wanted to quantify the performance of combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) and a second-trimester anomaly scan in detecting these aberrations. Finally, we aimed to estimate the consequences of a policy of using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) rather than invasive testing with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) to manage pregnancies identified as high risk by cFTS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of the Danish Fetal Medicine Database of all pregnant women who underwent cFTS and a risk assessment for trisomy 21 between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. Chromosomal aberrations diagnosed prenatally, postnatally or from fetal tissue following pregnancy loss or termination of pregnancy were identified. Chromosomal aberrations were grouped into one of six categories: triploidy; common trisomy (13, 18 or 21); monosomy X; other sex-chromosome aberration (SCA); pCNV; and rare autosomal trisomy (RAT) or mosaicism. The prevalence of each aberration category was stratified by the individual cFTS markers and trisomy 21 risk estimate, and the size of each pCNV diagnosed by CMA was calculated.

RESULTS

We retrieved data on 565 708 pregnancies, of which 3982 (0.70%) were diagnosed with a fetal chromosomal aberration. cFTS identified 87% of the common trisomies, but it also performed well in identifying triploidies (86%), monosomy X (92%), atypical SCAs (58%) and RATs or mosaicisms (70%). pCNVs comprised 27% (n = 1091) of the chromosomal aberrations diagnosed overall, and the prevalence increased during the study period, as prenatal CMA was increasingly being performed. In pregnancies with a maternal age < 30 years, nuchal translucency (NT) thickness ≤ 95 centile, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) ≥ 1 multiple of the median, or trisomy 21 risk of ≤ 1 in 1000, the prevalence of pCNVs exceeded significantly the prevalence of trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Pregnancies affected by a pCNV had significantly increased NT and decreased levels of the maternal biomarkers PAPP-A and β-human chorionic gonadotropin compared with unaffected pregnancies. However, only 23% of these pregnancies screened positive on cFTS and 51% of pCNVs were not detected until after birth. Among high-risk pregnancies, pCNVs comprised 14% of diagnosed aberrations, and when other atypical aberrations were considered, conventional NIPT (screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and monosomy X) would miss 27% of all pathogenic aberrations diagnosed from invasive testing following a high-risk cFTS result. Thus, 1 in 26 pregnancies at high risk following cFTS would be affected by a chromosomal aberration despite a normal result from conventional NIPT. In a contingent screening model using NIPT for the 'intermediate'-risk group (trisomy 21 risk of 1 in 100-299), 50% of the aberrations would be missed. In our cohort, 79% of the pCNVs diagnosed were < 5Mb and therefore not detectable using current forms of 'genome-wide' NIPT.

CONCLUSIONS

As a by-product of screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, most triploidies and the majority of atypical SCAs, RATs and mosaicisms are detected before birth. However, only 23% of pCNVs are associated with a high-risk result according to cFTS and only half are diagnosed before birth. Replacing invasive testing with NIPT for high-risk pregnancies would substantially decrease the first-trimester detection of pathogenic chromosomal anomalies. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是研究受非典型染色体畸变影响的妊娠的产前特征,重点关注致病性拷贝数变异(pCNV)。我们还想量化孕早期联合筛查(cFTS)和孕中期超声结构筛查在检测这些畸变方面的表现。最后,我们旨在评估采用无创产前检测(NIPT)而非染色体微阵列分析(CMA)的侵入性检测来管理经cFTS鉴定为高风险的妊娠这一策略的后果。

方法

这是一项对丹麦胎儿医学数据库的回顾性研究,纳入了2008年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间接受cFTS和21三体风险评估的所有孕妇。确定产前、产后或妊娠丢失或终止妊娠后从胎儿组织诊断出的染色体畸变。染色体畸变分为六类之一:三倍体;常见三体(13、18或21三体);X单体;其他性染色体畸变(SCA);pCNV;以及罕见常染色体三体(RAT)或嵌合体。每种畸变类别的患病率按个体cFTS标志物和21三体风险估计进行分层,并计算通过CMA诊断的每个pCNV的大小。

结果

我们检索了565708例妊娠的数据,其中3982例(0.70%)被诊断为胎儿染色体畸变。cFTS识别出87%的常见三体,但在识别三倍体(86%)、X单体(92%)、非典型SCA(58%)和RAT或嵌合体(70%)方面也表现良好。pCNV占总体诊断出的染色体畸变的27%(n = 1091),并且在研究期间患病率有所增加,因为产前CMA的应用越来越多。在母亲年龄<30岁、颈项透明层(NT)厚度≤第95百分位数、妊娠相关血浆蛋白A(PAPP-A)≥中位数的1倍或21三体风险≤1/1000的妊娠中,pCNV的患病率显著超过21、18和13三体的患病率。与未受影响的妊娠相比,受pCNV影响的妊娠NT显著增加,母亲生物标志物PAPP-A和β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素水平降低。然而,这些妊娠中只有23%在cFTS上筛查呈阳性,51%的pCNV直到出生后才被检测到。在高危妊娠中,pCNV占诊断出的畸变的14%,当考虑其他非典型畸变时,传统NIPT(筛查21、18和13三体以及X单体)将遗漏高危cFTS结果后侵入性检测诊断出的所有致病性畸变的27%。因此,cFTS后高危的妊娠中,每26例中有1例会受到染色体畸变的影响,尽管传统NIPT结果正常。在使用NIPT对“中等”风险组(21三体风险为1/100 - 299)进行的偶然筛查模型中,50%的畸变会被遗漏。在我们的队列中,诊断出的pCNV中有79%<5Mb,因此使用当前形式的“全基因组”NIPT无法检测到。

结论

作为21、18和13三体筛查的副产品,大多数三倍体以及大多数非典型SCA、RAT和嵌合体在出生前被检测到。然而,根据cFTS,只有23%的pCNV与高风险结果相关,并且只有一半在出生前被诊断出来。用NIPT替代高危妊娠的侵入性检测将大幅减少孕早期致病性染色体异常的检测。© 2024作者。《妇产科超声》由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科超声学会出版。

相似文献

1
Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT.孕早期联合筛查与非典型染色体畸变的侵入性诊断:丹麦全国范围内关于产前特征及检测与无创产前检测对比的研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.27667. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Atypicality index as an add-on to combined first-trimester screening for chromosomal aberrations.非典型性指数作为联合早孕期筛查染色体异常的附加手段。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun;63(6):798-806. doi: 10.1002/uog.27562.
3
Decoding 22q11.2: prenatal profiling and first-trimester risk assessment in Danish nationwide cohort.解码 22q11.2:丹麦全国队列的产前分析和早孕期风险评估。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;63(1):34-43. doi: 10.1002/uog.27466.
4
Increased nuchal translucency thickness and normal chromosomal microarray: Danish nationwide cohort study.颈项透明层厚度增加与染色体微阵列正常:丹麦全国队列研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;65(4):462-469. doi: 10.1002/uog.29198. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
5
Contingent first-trimester screening for aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in a Danish clinical setting.在丹麦临床环境中使用游离胎儿 DNA 进行有条件的早孕期筛查非整倍体。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.17562. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
6
Chromosomal microarray as primary diagnostic genomic tool for pregnancies at increased risk within a population-based combined first-trimester screening program.在基于人群的联合早孕期筛查计划中,对于高危妊娠,染色体微阵列作为主要的诊断性基因组工具。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):480-486. doi: 10.1002/uog.17548. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
7
State-wide utilization and performance of traditional and cell-free DNA-based prenatal testing pathways: the Victorian Perinatal Record Linkage (PeRL) study.全州范围内传统和无细胞 DNA 产前检测途径的利用和表现:维多利亚州围产期记录链接(PeRL)研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;56(2):215-224. doi: 10.1002/uog.21899.
8
Prenatal diagnostic testing and atypical chromosome abnormalities following combined first-trimester screening: implications for contingent models of non-invasive prenatal testing.产前诊断检测与联合早孕期筛查后的非典型染色体异常:对非侵入性产前检测的条件模型的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):487-492. doi: 10.1002/uog.18979.
9
Factors associated with common and atypical chromosome abnormalities after positive combined first-trimester screening in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study.在中国女性中,行联合早孕期筛查阳性后,与常见和非典型染色体异常相关的因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2205-y.
10
Clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies.超声异常妊娠中非侵入性产前检测的临床应用价值
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):721-728. doi: 10.1002/uog.17228.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the prenatal diagnostic value of non-invasive prenatal testing for the detection of rare fetal autosomal trisomies: a single center study of 83,842 cases.评估无创产前检测对罕见胎儿常染色体三体的产前诊断价值:一项83842例单中心研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 19;15(1):26254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09757-7.
2
Counseling prior to cfDNA screening: are we giving the right numbers?cfDNA筛查前的咨询:我们提供的数字正确吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08108-1.
3
Pregnancy outcomes of 4,200 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in Henan, China.
中国河南4200例颈部透明带增厚胎儿的妊娠结局
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 2;12:1514504. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1514504. eCollection 2025.
4
Strategies to Detect Chromosomal Anomalies Not Identified by NIPT.检测无创产前检测(NIPT)未识别的染色体异常的策略。
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Apr;45(4):464-472. doi: 10.1002/pd.6755. Epub 2025 Feb 21.