• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮超声引导与开放切开股血管入路在 REBOA 导管置管中的应用比较。

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided versus open cut-down access to femoral vessels for the placement of a REBOA catheter.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 20;14(1):9111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59778-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-59778-x
PMID:38643229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11032382/
Abstract

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) may be useful in treating exsanguinating trauma patients. This study seeks to compare rates of success, complications and time required for vascular access between ultrasound-guidance and surgical cut-down for femoral sheath insertion as a prospective observational case control study. Participating clinicians from either trauma surgery or anesthesiology were allocated to surgical cut-down or percutaneous ultrasound-guided puncture on a 1:1 ratio. Time spans to vessel identification, successful puncture, and balloon inflation were recorded. 80 study participants were recruited and allocated to 40 open cut-down approaches and 40 percutaneous ultrasound-guided approaches. REBOA catheter placement was successful in 18/40 cases (45%) using a percutaneous ultrasound guided technique and 33/40 times (83%) using the open cut-down approach (p < 0.001). Median times [in seconds] compared between percutaneous ultrasound-guided puncture and surgical cut-down were 36 (18-73) versus 117(56-213) for vessel visualization (p < 0.001), 136 (97-175) versus 183 (156-219) for vessel puncture (p < 0.001), and 375 (240-600) versus 288 (244-379) for balloon inflation (p = 0.08) overall. Access to femoral vessels for REBOA catheter placement is safer when performed by cut-down and direct visualization but can be performed faster by an ultrasound-guided technique when vessels can be identified clearly and rapidly.

摘要

主动脉腔内球囊阻断复苏(REBOA)可能对治疗出血性创伤患者有用。本研究旨在比较超声引导与手术切开两种方法用于股鞘插入时的成功率、并发症和血管通路建立所需时间,这是一项前瞻性观察性病例对照研究。创伤外科或麻醉科的参与临床医生按照 1:1 的比例被分配到手术切开或经皮超声引导穿刺。记录血管识别、成功穿刺和球囊充气所需的时间跨度。共招募了 80 名研究参与者,并将其分配到 40 例开放切开入路和 40 例经皮超声引导入路。使用经皮超声引导技术,REBOA 导管放置成功率为 18/40 例(45%),而使用开放切开入路的成功率为 33/40 例(83%)(p<0.001)。经皮超声引导穿刺与手术切开相比,穿刺部位血管可视化的中位数时间[秒]分别为 36(18-73)与 117(56-213)(p<0.001),血管穿刺的中位数时间分别为 136(97-175)与 183(156-219)(p<0.001),球囊充气的中位数时间分别为 375(240-600)与 288(244-379)(p=0.08)。切开直视下进行 REBOA 导管置管术时,股血管通路的安全性更高,但如果可以快速明确并识别血管,经皮超声引导技术可以更快地完成操作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/053c/11032382/705f4faa4382/41598_2024_59778_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/053c/11032382/705f4faa4382/41598_2024_59778_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/053c/11032382/705f4faa4382/41598_2024_59778_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided versus open cut-down access to femoral vessels for the placement of a REBOA catheter.经皮超声引导与开放切开股血管入路在 REBOA 导管置管中的应用比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 20;14(1):9111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59778-x.
2
Ultrasound-guided versus blind vascular access followed by REBOA on board of a medical helicopter in a hemorrhagic ovine model.超声引导与盲法血管入路在医疗直升机上应用 REBOA 治疗绵羊出血模型。
Injury. 2021 Feb;52(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.053. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Ultrasound-Guided Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in the Resuscitation Area.复苏区域内超声引导下的主动脉复苏性血管内球囊阻断术
J Emerg Med. 2017 May;52(5):715-722. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
4
The AAST prospective Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry: Data on contemporary utilization and outcomes of aortic occlusion and resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA).美国创伤外科学会(AAST)创伤与急性病手术中主动脉阻断复苏(AORTA)前瞻性注册研究:关于主动脉阻断及主动脉复苏性球囊阻断(REBOA)的当代应用情况及结果的数据。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):409-19. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001079.
5
Arterial Access Complications Following Percutaneous Femoral Access in 24-Hour Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Survivors.主动脉24小时复苏性血管内球囊阻断术幸存者经皮股动脉穿刺后的动脉穿刺并发症
J Surg Res. 2023 Oct;290:203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
6
Time to aortic occlusion: It's all about access.主动脉阻断时间:一切都与入路有关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Dec;83(6):1161-1164. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001665.
7
Practice, Practice, Practice! Effect of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Volume on Outcomes: Data From the AAST AORTA Registry.实践、实践、再实践!主动脉球囊阻断复苏术容量对结局的影响:AAST AORTA 登记处的数据。
J Surg Res. 2020 Sep;253:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
Partial Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta via the Tri-Lobe Balloon Catheter.经三球囊导管行主动脉部分复苏性血管内球囊阻断术。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.056. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
Emergent non-image-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter placement: A cadaver-based study.急诊非影像引导下主动脉复苏性血管内球囊阻断术(REBOA)导管置入:一项基于尸体的研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):453-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001106.
10
High resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta procedural volume is associated with improved outcomes: An analysis of the AORTA registry.高复苏性血管内球囊阻断主动脉术式量与改善结局相关:AORTA 注册研究分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Nov 1;91(5):781-789. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003201.

引用本文的文献

1
[Focus emergency medicine 2023/2024-Summary of selected studies in emergency medicine].[聚焦急诊医学2023/2024 - 急诊医学精选研究综述]
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Nov;73(11):746-759. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01465-7. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
REBOA in trauma: a life-saving intervention or a spectacular failure?创伤中的主动脉内球囊阻断术:一种挽救生命的干预措施还是一次重大失败?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2689-2695. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02657-x. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Aortoesophageal fistula with hemorrhagic shock successfully treated with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Trauma Patients With Exsanguinating Hemorrhage: The UK-REBOA Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤性出血性休克患者急诊经皮主动脉腔内球囊阻断复苏:英国 REBOA 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 21;330(19):1862-1871. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20850.
2
Systematic review to evaluate algorithms for REBOA use in trauma and identify a consensus for patient selection.系统评价以评估用于创伤的REBOA算法,并确定患者选择的共识。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Dec 23;7(1):e000984. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000984. eCollection 2022.
3
Zone 1 Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta vs Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Patient Resuscitation After Severe Hemorrhagic Shock.
主动脉食管瘘合并失血性休克经主动脉复苏性血管内球囊闭塞术成功治疗。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 6;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00706-1.
4
Emergency treatment of pelvic ring injuries: state of the art.骨盆环损伤的急诊处理:最新进展。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Oct;144(10):4525-4539. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05447-7. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
区域 1 主动脉腔内球囊阻断与复苏性开胸术治疗严重失血性休克后患者复苏
JAMA Surg. 2023 Feb 1;158(2):140-150. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6393.
4
Reporting ChAracteristics of cadaver training and sUrgical studies: The CACTUS guidelines.尸体训练与外科研究的报告特征:仙人掌指南。
Int J Surg. 2022 May;101:106619. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106619. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
Life over limb: Arterial access-related limb ischemic complications in 48-hour REBOA survivors.生命重于肢体:48小时REBOA幸存者中与动脉入路相关的肢体缺血并发症
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Apr 1;92(4):723-728. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003440.
6
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with major trauma and uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis.复苏性经皮主动脉球囊阻断术(REBOA)在伴有大出血性休克的严重创伤患者中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Aug 12;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00386-9.
7
Predicting success of resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta: Timing supersedes variable techniques in predicting patient survival.预测主动脉腔内复苏闭塞术的成功:时机优于预测患者生存的可变技术。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Sep 1;91(3):473-479. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003307.
8
Damage control resuscitation: REBOA as the new fourth pillar.损伤控制性复苏:REBOA 作为新的第四大支柱。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2020 Dec 30;51(4):e4014353. doi: 10.25100/cm.v51i4.4353.
9
Successfully REBOA performance: does medical specialty matter? International data from the ABOTrauma Registry.REBOA 操作成功:医学专业是否重要?ABOTrauma 登记处的国际数据。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 23;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00342-z.
10
Ultrasound-guided versus blind vascular access followed by REBOA on board of a medical helicopter in a hemorrhagic ovine model.超声引导与盲法血管入路在医疗直升机上应用 REBOA 治疗绵羊出血模型。
Injury. 2021 Feb;52(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.053. Epub 2020 Sep 25.