Politecnico di Milano, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Environmental section, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Politecnico di Milano, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Environmental section, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Waste Manag. 2024 Jun 15;182:74-90. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
To understand which are the best strategies for textile waste management and to analyse the effects on the environment of applying circular economy practices to textile products, a review of 45 publications where life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied to these topics has been carried out. The separate collection of textiles, followed by reuse and recycling brings relevant environmental benefits, with impacts related to reuse resulting lower than those of recycling. At the opposite, when mixed municipal solid waste is addressed to energy recovery, the textile fraction is the second most impacting on climate change, right after plastics, while for landfill disposal impacts textiles directly follow the more biodegradable fractions. Textiles manufacturing using recycled fibres generally gives lower impacts than using virgin ones, with a few exceptions in some impact categories for cotton and polyester. The circular practices with the lowest impacts are those that ensure the extension of the textiles service life. Another aim of this review is to identify the main variables affecting the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). These resulted to be the yield and material demand of recycling processes, the use phase variables, the assumptions on virgin production replaced by reuse or recycling, the substitution factor in reuse, and transportation data in business models based on sharing. Thus, in LCA modelling, great attention should be paid to these variables. Future research should address these aspects, to acquire more relevant data, based on industrial-scale processes and on people habits towards the circular economy strategies applied to textiles.
为了了解纺织品废物管理的最佳策略,并分析将循环经济实践应用于纺织品对环境的影响,对 45 篇应用生命周期评估(LCA)研究这些主题的文献进行了综述。对纺织品进行单独收集,然后再进行再利用和回收,可以带来相关的环境效益,与回收相关的影响低于再利用的影响。相反,当混合城市固体废物用于能源回收时,纺织品是仅次于塑料对气候变化影响第二大的部分,而对于垃圾填埋处置,纺织品的影响直接紧随更易生物降解的部分。使用回收纤维制造纺织品通常比使用原始纤维的影响要小,但在某些棉和聚酯的影响类别中存在一些例外。对生命周期影响评估(LCIA)影响最小的循环实践是那些能够延长纺织品使用寿命的实践。本综述的另一个目的是确定影响生命周期影响评估(LCIA)的主要变量。这些变量包括回收过程的产率和材料需求、使用阶段变量、对再利用或回收替代的原始生产的假设、再利用中的替代因素,以及基于共享的商业模式中的运输数据。因此,在 LCA 建模中,应特别注意这些变量。未来的研究应解决这些方面的问题,以获取更多基于工业规模的过程和人们对应用于纺织品的循环经济策略的习惯的相关数据。