Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Aug 1;884:163821. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163821. Epub 2023 May 1.
The considerable environmental burden of textiles is currently globally recognized. This burden can be mitigated by applying circular economy (CE) strategies to the commonly linear, short garment life cycles that end with incineration or landfill disposal. Even though all CE strategies strive to promote environmental sustainability, they might not be equally beneficial. Environmental data on different textile products is insufficiently available, which leads to complications when assessing and deciding on different CE strategies to be implemented. This paper studies the environmental impacts of a polyester T-shirt's linear life cycle through life cycle assessment (LCA) and evaluates the benefits attainable by adopting different CE strategies, and their order of priority, while noting uncertainty arising from poor data quality or unavailability. The LCA is complemented by assessing health and environmental risks related to the different options. Most of the linear life cycle's LCA-based impacts arise from use-phase washing. Hence, it is possible to reduce the environmental impact notably (37 %) by reducing the washing frequency. Adopting a CE strategy in which the shirt is reused by a second consumer, to double the number of uses, enables an 18 % impact reduction. Repurposing recycled materials to produce the T-shirt and recycling the T-shirt material itself emerged as the least impactful CE strategies. From the risk perspective, reusing the garment is the most efficient way to reduce environmental and health risks while washing frequency has a very limited effect. Combining different CE strategies offers the greatest potential for reducing both environmental impacts as well as risks. Data gaps and assumptions related to the use phase cause the highest uncertainty in the LCA results. To gain the maximum environmental benefits of utilizing CE strategies on polyester garments, consumer actions, design solutions, and transparent data sharing are needed.
纺织品对环境造成的巨大负担目前已在全球范围内得到认可。通过将循环经济 (CE) 策略应用于通常线性的、以焚烧或填埋处置为终点的短服装生命周期,可以减轻这种负担。尽管所有 CE 策略都旨在促进环境可持续性,但它们的效果可能并不完全相同。不同纺织品的环境数据不足,这使得在评估和决定实施不同的 CE 策略时变得复杂。本文通过生命周期评估 (LCA) 研究了聚酯 T 恤线性生命周期的环境影响,并评估了采用不同 CE 策略的收益及其优先级,同时注意到由于数据质量差或不可用而产生的不确定性。通过评估与不同方案相关的健康和环境风险,对 LCA 进行了补充。线性生命周期基于 LCA 的大部分影响来自使用阶段的洗涤。因此,通过降低洗涤频率,显著减少环境影响(37%)是可能的。采用 CE 策略,让第二个消费者重复使用 T 恤,将使用次数增加一倍,可以减少 18%的影响。将回收材料重新用于生产 T 恤并回收 T 恤材料本身是最具影响力的 CE 策略。从风险角度来看,重复使用服装是减少环境和健康风险的最有效方法,而洗涤频率的影响非常有限。结合不同的 CE 策略可以最大程度地减少环境影响和风险。与使用阶段相关的数据差距和假设是 LCA 结果中不确定性最高的因素。为了在聚酯服装上利用 CE 策略获得最大的环境效益,需要消费者采取行动、设计解决方案和透明的数据共享。