Department of Human Development Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(9):1331-1351. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2341317. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
Knowledge of the cardiovascular and respiratory effects of cannabis use by route of administration is unclear. This evidence is necessary to increase clinical and public health awareness given the recent trend in cannabis legalization, normalization, and surge in the availability and usage of various forms of cannabis products. Search was conducted in Web of Science, ProQuest, Psych INFO, Scopus, Embase, and Medline databases, and subsequently in the references of retrieved articles. Peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2023, that reported on cardiovascular and respiratory effects of cannabis use by route of administration were included. Studies with no report of the route of administration and combined use of other illicit substances were excluded. The review was guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Of the 1873 articles retrieved, 42 met inclusion criteria encompassing six case reports, 21 reviews, and 15 empirical studies. Four administration routes were identified: smoking, vaping, oral ingestion, and dabbing. Smoking was the most common route of administration and was associated with both respiratory effects, such as bronchitis, dyspnea, and chronic obstructive lung disease, and cardiovascular effects including tachycardia, ventricular arrhythmias, and myocardial infarction. Cannabis edibles were associated with minimal respiratory effects. Tachycardia was the most common cardiovascular effect and was associated with all routes of administration. Cannabis use does cause cardiovascular and respiratory effects, but the conclusion remains tentative of the cardiovascular and respiratory effects by route of administration due to methodological limitations of the studies.
关于通过给药途径使用大麻对心血管和呼吸系统影响的知识尚不清楚。鉴于最近大麻合法化、正常化以及各种形式的大麻产品的供应和使用增加的趋势,有必要增加临床和公共卫生意识,这就需要这方面的证据。在 Web of Science、ProQuest、Psych INFO、Scopus、Embase 和 Medline 数据库中进行了检索,随后检索了已检索文章的参考文献。纳入了 2009 年至 2023 年期间发表的报告通过给药途径使用大麻对心血管和呼吸系统影响的同行评议文章。排除了没有报告给药途径和同时使用其他非法物质的研究。该综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南。在检索到的 1873 篇文章中,有 42 篇符合纳入标准,包括 6 篇病例报告、21 篇综述和 15 项实证研究。确定了 4 种给药途径:吸烟、蒸气吸入、口服和点吸。吸烟是最常见的给药途径,与呼吸效应有关,如支气管炎、呼吸困难和慢性阻塞性肺病,以及心血管效应,包括心动过速、室性心律失常和心肌梗死。大麻食用剂与最小的呼吸效应有关。心动过速是最常见的心血管效应,与所有给药途径有关。大麻使用确实会引起心血管和呼吸系统的影响,但由于研究方法上的限制,关于给药途径引起的心血管和呼吸系统影响的结论仍然不确定。