Suppr超能文献

一种用于评估2型糖尿病患者数字工具使用情况的新型问卷(DTUQ-D):探索数字领域。

A novel questionnaire for evaluating digital tool use (DTUQ-D) among individuals with type 2 diabetes: exploring the digital landscape.

作者信息

Peleg Ora, Hadar Efrat, Boniel-Nissim Meyran

机构信息

Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Emek Yezreel, Israel.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 5;12:1374848. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1374848. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Effective healthcare currently incorporates a patient-centric system and accessible technology for patient self-management. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel questionnaire titled the Digital Tool Use Questionnaire for Diabetes (DTUQ-D) - a screening tool identifying the type, number, and frequency of digital tools used by Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients with within HMOs, online, and via applications.

METHODS

The questionnaire was administered to two ethnic groups and both genders. A mixed-methods approach was used. In the qualitative phase, the questionnaire was developed through phone surveys of 29 T2DM patients, two endocrinologists and two technology experts. In the quantitative phase, involving 367 participants, convergent validity, construct validity, and reliability were examined.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that the DTUQ-D is valid and reliable, successfully identifying digital tools utilized by T2DM patients, notwithstanding variations in factor structures between ethnic groups. This questionnaire provides a foundation for future research, offering a standardized approach to evaluating digital tool usage.

DISCUSSION

The study enhances understanding of the role of digital tools in healthcare, especially for T2DM self-management. It also can be easily adapted to assess digital tool use for other illnesses by adjusting instructions and the wording of certain items.

摘要

引言

有效的医疗保健目前采用以患者为中心的系统和便于患者自我管理的技术。本研究旨在开发并验证一种名为糖尿病数字工具使用问卷(DTUQ-D)的新型问卷——一种筛查工具,用于识别健康维护组织(HMO)内部、在线及通过应用程序使用数字工具的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者所使用数字工具的类型、数量和频率。

方法

该问卷面向两个种族群体和不同性别的人群进行发放。采用了混合方法。在定性阶段,通过对29名T2DM患者、两名内分泌学家和两名技术专家进行电话调查来开发问卷。在定量阶段,涉及367名参与者,对问卷的收敛效度、结构效度和信度进行了检验。

结果

研究结果表明,DTUQ-D有效且可靠,尽管不同种族群体之间的因子结构存在差异,但仍能成功识别T2DM患者使用的数字工具。该问卷为未来的研究奠定了基础,提供了一种评估数字工具使用情况的标准化方法。

讨论

该研究增进了对数字工具在医疗保健中作用的理解,尤其是对T2DM自我管理的作用。通过调整某些条目的说明和措辞,它也可以很容易地适用于评估其他疾病的数字工具使用情况。

相似文献

1
A novel questionnaire for evaluating digital tool use (DTUQ-D) among individuals with type 2 diabetes: exploring the digital landscape.
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 5;12:1374848. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1374848. eCollection 2024.
4
Development and validation of the diabetic self-management scale based on information-motivation-behavioral skills theory.
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1109158. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109158. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric Testing of an Indonesian-Version Diabetes Self-Management Instrument.
J Nurs Res. 2020 Dec;28(6):e127. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000403.
9
Psychometric Evaluation of a Turkish Version of the Diabetes Fear of Self-injecting and Self-testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ).
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2016 Sep;10(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
The Role of Physicians' Digital Tools in Pharmacological Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 6;58(8):1061. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081061.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Media and Black Maternal Health: The Role of Health Literacy and eHealth Literacy.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Jul;7(3):e119-e129. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230614-01. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
3
Behavioral, psychological, and clinical outcomes of Arabic-speaking people with type 2 diabetes during COVID-19 pandemic.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Jun;16(3):355-360. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178982.
8
A New Taxonomy for Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Interventions: Results of an Umbrella Review.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):812-824. doi: 10.1177/19322968211036430. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
10
Group differences in health literacy are ameliorated in ehealth literacy.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 May 15;9(1):480-497. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1926256.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验