Biemiller Andrew
Dr. Eric Jackman Institute of Child Study, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1280568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1280568. eCollection 2024.
This article concerns two types of word meanings: nonverbal meanings which appear to be associated with neurological representations and verbally-based meanings which appear to depend in part on other words to construct meanings. Using word use data from Hart and Risley's study of children aged 19 to 36 months, and word meaning knowledge data from Biemiller and Slonim's studies of children between aged 5 to 11, meanings were classified as nonverbal or verbally-based. Biemiller and Slonim used sampled word meanings reported known from grade levels 2 to 12 reported by Dale and O'Rourke in their Living Word Vocabulary. Virtually all meanings used at age 3 or known at age 5 (preschool) were classified nonverbal. By grade two, and even more by grade five, children had added many verbally-defined meanings, although by grade five the majority of the word meanings known were still nonverbal. Evidence for neurological meaning associates are cited. Implications for vocabulary support and instruction at various ages suggest that for children under 6, supporting larger nonverbal vocabularies while after age 6 should prioritize verbally-defined meanings.
一种是似乎与神经表征相关的非语言意义,另一种是部分依赖于其他词汇来构建意义的基于语言的意义。利用哈特和里斯利对19至36个月大儿童的研究中的词汇使用数据,以及比米勒和斯洛宁对5至11岁儿童的研究中的词义知识数据,将词义分类为非语言的或基于语言的。比米勒和斯洛宁使用了戴尔和奥罗克在其《常用词汇表》中报告的2至12年级已知的抽样词义。实际上,3岁时使用的所有意义或5岁(学龄前)时已知的意义都被归类为非语言的。到二年级时,甚至到五年级时,孩子们增加了许多基于语言定义的意义,尽管到五年级时已知的大多数词义仍然是非语言的。文中引用了神经意义关联的证据。对不同年龄段词汇支持和教学的启示表明,对于6岁以下的儿童,应支持更大的非语言词汇量,而6岁以后则应优先考虑基于语言定义的意义。