Zhang Wenjing, Liang Zhanpeng, Zhao Yurong, Li Yanwei, Chen Ting, Li Wenxia, Chen Yunqi, Wu Peiye, Zhang Huatang, Fang Cantu, Li Luzhen
Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, China.
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1359302. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359302. eCollection 2024.
At present, several important trials have been published show that perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer, which further optimizes treatment options. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
The following databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library (updated 12 October 2023). All randomized trials comparing perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in resectable non-small cell lung cancer were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (Cochrane collaboration software). Primary outcomes and measures included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, rate of underwent surgery and adverse events (AEs).
A total of 2912 patients (1453 receiving perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and 1459 receiving chemotherapy alone) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The result showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, combined therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.68;95% CI: 0.56-0.83), EFS (HR = 0.58;95% CI: 0.51-0.65), pCR (OR = 7.53;95% CI: 4.63-12.26), MPR (OR = 5.03;95% CI: 3.40-7.44), R0 resection (OR = 1.58;95% CI: 1.152.18) and rate of underwent surgery (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.04-1.49). However, combination therapy was associated with higher risk of severe adverse event (OR = 1.46;95% CI: 1.19-1.78; P=0.0002), grade 3 and higher treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) (OR = 1.25;95% CI: 1.06-1.49; P=0.010), TRAE that led to interruption (OR = 1.90;95% CI: 1.34-2.68; P=0.0003) and immune-related adverse event (OR = 2.78;95% CI: 2.18-3.55; P<0.00001). Significant benefits were observed across most subgroups of EFS and pCR. However, no statistical differences were observed for EFS of never smoked (HR = 0.73;95% CI: 0.51-1.05) and EGFR-mutation positive (HR = 0.35;95% CI: 0.04-3.03).
This systematic review and meta-analysis found superior efficacy associated with perioperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in both tumor regression and prolonged survival in resectable NSCLC, but increased the risk of TRAE, so monitoring for adverse events is warranted.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42023476786).
目前,已有多项重要试验表明,围手术期免疫治疗联合化疗可改善可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的预后,进一步优化了治疗方案。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估围手术期免疫治疗联合化疗在可切除非小细胞肺癌中的疗效和安全性。
检索了以下数据库中的相关研究:PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆(2023年10月12日更新)。所有比较围手术期免疫治疗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗可切除非小细胞肺癌的随机试验均符合纳入标准。使用Review Manager 5.4.1(Cochrane协作软件)进行数据分析。主要结局指标包括总生存期(OS)、无事件生存期(EFS)、病理完全缓解(pCR)、主要病理缓解(MPR)、R0切除率、手术率和不良事件(AE)。
本系统评价和荟萃分析共纳入2912例患者(1453例接受围手术期免疫治疗加化疗,1459例接受单纯化疗)。结果显示,与单纯化疗相比,联合治疗显著改善了总生存期(HR = 0.68;95%CI:0.56 - 0.83)、无事件生存期(HR = 0.58;95%CI:0.51 - 0.65)、病理完全缓解率(OR = 7.53;95%CI:4.63 - 12.26)、主要病理缓解率(OR = 5.03;95%CI:3.40 - 7.44)、R0切除率(OR = 1.58;95%CI:1.15 - 2.18)和手术率(OR = 1.25;95%CI:1.04 - 1.49)。然而,联合治疗与严重不良事件风险较高相关(OR = 1.46;95%CI:1.19 - 1.78;P = 0.0002)、3级及以上治疗相关不良事件(TRAE)(OR = 1.25;95%CI:1.06 - 1.49;P = 0.010)、导致治疗中断的TRAE(OR = 1.90;95%CI:1.34 - 2.68;P = 0.0003)和免疫相关不良事件(OR = 2.78;95%CI:2.18 - 3.55;P < 0.00001)。在无事件生存期和病理完全缓解的大多数亚组中均观察到显著益处。然而,从不吸烟者的无事件生存期(HR = 0.73;95%CI:0.51 - 1.05)和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性患者的无事件生存期(HR = 0.35;95%CI:0.04 - 3.03)未观察到统计学差异。
本系统评价和荟萃分析发现,与单纯化疗相比,围手术期免疫治疗联合化疗在可切除非小细胞肺癌的肿瘤退缩和生存期延长方面疗效更佳,但增加了治疗相关不良事件的风险,因此有必要监测不良事件。