School of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Mar;126(3):390-412. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000386.
There is abundant evidence that emotion categorization is influenced by the social category membership of target faces, with target sex and target race modulating the ease with which perceivers can categorize happy and angry emotional expressions. However, theoretical interpretation of these findings is constrained by gender and race imbalances in both the participant samples and target faces typically used when demonstrating these effects (e.g., most participants have been White women and most Black targets have been men). Across seven experiments, the current research used gender-matched samples (Experiments 1a and 1b), gender- and racial identity-matched samples (Experiments 2a and 2b), and manipulations of social context (Experiments 3a, 3b, and 4) to establish whether emotion categorization is influenced by interactions between the social category membership of perceivers and target faces. Supporting this idea, we found the presence and size of the happy face advantage were influenced by interactions between perceivers and target social categories, with reliable happy face advantages in reaction times for ingroup targets but not necessarily for outgroup targets. White targets and female targets were the only categories associated with a reliable happy face advantage that was independent of perceiver category. The interactions between perceiver and target social category were eliminated when targets were blocked by social category (e.g., a block of all White female targets; Experiments 3a and 3b) and accentuated when targets were associated with additional category information (i.e., ingroup/outgroup nationality; Experiment 4). These findings support the possibility that contextually sensitive intergroup processes influence emotion categorization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
有大量证据表明,情绪分类受到目标面孔的社会类别成员身份的影响,目标性别和目标种族调节了感知者对快乐和愤怒情绪表达进行分类的难易程度。然而,这些发现的理论解释受到参与者样本和目标面孔中性别和种族不平衡的限制,这些不平衡通常用于展示这些效应(例如,大多数参与者是白人女性,而大多数黑人目标是男性)。在七项实验中,当前的研究使用了性别匹配的样本(实验 1a 和 1b)、性别和种族认同匹配的样本(实验 2a 和 2b)以及社会环境的操纵(实验 3a、3b 和 4)来确定情绪分类是否受到感知者和目标面孔的社会类别成员之间的相互作用的影响。支持这一观点,我们发现,情绪分类受到感知者和目标社会类别之间相互作用的影响,在反应时间上对内群体目标存在可靠的快乐面孔优势,但不一定对外群体目标存在这种优势。只有白人和女性目标与独立于感知者类别的可靠快乐面孔优势相关。当目标按社会类别分组时(例如,所有白人女性目标的分组;实验 3a 和 3b),感知者和目标社会类别之间的相互作用被消除,而当目标与其他类别信息(即内群体/外群体国籍;实验 4)相关联时,这些相互作用被强调。这些发现支持了情境敏感的群体间过程影响情绪分类的可能性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。