• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of Tirofiban on Neurological Deterioration in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.替罗非班对急性缺血性脑卒中患者神经功能恶化的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2024 Jun 1;81(6):594-602. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0868.
2
Tirofiban on First-Pass Recanalization in Acute Stroke Endovascular Thrombectomy: The OPTIMISTIC Randomized Clinical Trial.替罗非班用于急性卒中血管内血栓切除术首次通过再通:OPTIMISTIC随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255308. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5308.
3
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in preventing neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke (TREND): Protocol for an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, masked endpoint trial.替罗非班预防急性缺血性卒中神经功能恶化的安全性和有效性(TREND):一项研究者发起的多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲法终点试验方案
Brain Circ. 2024 Jun 26;10(2):168-173. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_93_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
4
Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke: The ATAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林与单用阿司匹林治疗急性轻至中度卒中患者:ATAMIS随机临床试验
JAMA Neurol. 2024 May 1;81(5):450-460. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0146.
5
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的随机临床试验(ARAMIS)
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
6
Clopidogrel and Aspirin Initiated Between 24 to 72 Hours for Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Analysis of the INSPIRES Randomized Clinical Trial.氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在轻度缺血性中风后 24 至 72 小时内开始使用:INSPIRES 随机临床试验的亚组分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31938.
7
Tirofiban for Stroke without Large or Medium-Sized Vessel Occlusion.替罗非班治疗无大或中等血管闭塞的脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 1;388(22):2025-2036. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214299.
8
Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban vs Placebo Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: The RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内血栓切除术治疗前静脉注射替罗非班与安慰剂对大血管闭塞性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:RESCUE BT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):543-553. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12584.
9
Effects of Oral Antiplatelet Agents and Tirofiban on Functional Outcomes of Patients with Non-Disabling Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke.口服抗血小板药物和替罗非班对非致残性小急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104829. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104829. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
RESCUE BT 2, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial of intravenous tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke: Study rationale and design.RESCUE BT 2 研究:静脉注射替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟试验:研究原理和设计。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Jun;18(5):620-625. doi: 10.1177/17474930221122681. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A disproportionality analysis of real-world adverse events associated with tirofiban from the FAERS database.基于FAERS数据库对与替罗非班相关的真实世界不良事件进行的不成比例性分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15964-z.
2
Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Mechanistic Rationale, Clinical Advances, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.替罗非班在急性缺血性卒中中的应用:作用机制、临床进展及新兴治疗策略
Drugs. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s40265-025-02222-9.
3
Early intensive therapy for preventing neurological deterioration in branch atheromatous disease.早期强化治疗预防分支动脉粥样硬化疾病的神经功能恶化
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Jul 24;18:17562864251357274. doi: 10.1177/17562864251357274. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluation of safety and efficacy of Tirofiban injection for treating acute ischemic stroke beyond standard time window.替罗非班注射液治疗超标准时间窗急性缺血性卒中的安全性及有效性评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 28;15(1):27399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11882-2.
5
Intravenous tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients not receiving reperfusion treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性缺血性卒中患者未接受再灌注治疗时静脉注射替罗非班:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2025 May 13;16:1552658. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1552658. eCollection 2025.
6
A prospective cohort study on prognostic implications of serum platelet derived microparticles levels in acute cerebral infarction.一项关于血清血小板衍生微粒水平对急性脑梗死预后影响的前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 23;15(1):14197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92732-z.
7
Effect of tirofiban arterial injection on neurological and endothelial function in acute ischemic stroke patients beyond the thrombolysis time window.替罗非班动脉注射对超过溶栓时间窗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者神经功能和内皮功能的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2044-2056. doi: 10.62347/BGRM4102. eCollection 2025.
8
Reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke: Where we are and where to go.急性缺血性卒中的再灌注治疗:我们所处的位置与前进的方向。
J Transl Int Med. 2025 Mar 19;13(1):1-3. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2025-0001. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
The potential of tirofiban: recommendation for further research on preventing early neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke.替罗非班的潜力:关于预防急性缺血性卒中早期神经功能恶化的进一步研究建议。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jan 9;87(1):10. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002774. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Efficacy, safety, and effect on platelet activation of the timing of administration of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke.替罗非班在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的给药时机对疗效、安全性及血小板活化的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Feb 15;17(2):791-805. doi: 10.62347/JUCB8921. eCollection 2025.

替罗非班对急性缺血性脑卒中患者神经功能恶化的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effects of Tirofiban on Neurological Deterioration in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2024 Jun 1;81(6):594-602. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0868.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0868
PMID:38648030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11036313/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Evidence supports using antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, neurological deterioration remains common under the currently recommended antiplatelet regimen, leading to poor clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intravenous tirofiban administered within 24 hours of stroke onset prevents early neurological deterioration in patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke compared with oral aspirin.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial with blinded end-point assessment was conducted at 10 comprehensive stroke centers in China between September 2020 and March 2023. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 80 years with acute noncardioembolic stroke within 24 hours of onset and had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 4 to 20.

INTERVENTION

Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive intravenous tirofiban or oral aspirin for 72 hours using a central, web-based, computer-generated randomization schedule; all patients then received oral aspirin.

MAIN OUTCOME

The primary efficacy outcome was early neurological deterioration (increase in NIHSS score ≥4 points) within 72 hours after randomization. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 72 hours after randomization.

RESULTS

A total of 425 patients were included in the intravenous tirofiban (n = 213) or oral aspirin (n = 212) groups. Median (IQR) age was 64.0 years (56.0-71.0); 124 patients (29.2%) were female, and 301 (70.8%) were male. Early neurological deterioration occurred in 9 patients (4.2%) in the tirofiban group and 28 patients (13.2%) in the aspirin group (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.65; P = .002). No patients in the tirofiban group experienced intracerebral hemorrhage. At 90-day follow-up, 3 patients (1.3%) in the tirofiban group and 3 (1.5%) in the aspirin group died (adjusted RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.27-8.54; P = .63), and the median (IQR) modified Rankin scale scores were 1.0 (0-1.25) and 1.0 (0-2), respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.90-1.83; P = .17).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In patients with noncardioembolic stroke who were seen within 24 hours of symptom onset, tirofiban decreased the risk of early neurological deterioration but did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or systematic bleeding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04491695.

摘要

重要性

有证据支持在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中使用抗血小板治疗。然而,目前推荐的抗血小板治疗方案下,仍有常见的神经功能恶化,导致临床结局较差。

目的

确定与口服阿司匹林相比,在卒中发作后 24 小时内给予静脉注射替罗非班是否可预防急性非心源性脑卒中患者的早期神经功能恶化。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项由研究者发起、多中心、开放性标签、随机临床试验,采用盲法终点评估,于 2020 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月在中国的 10 家综合卒中中心进行。纳入的患者为发病 24 小时内的急性非心源性卒中,年龄在 18 至 80 岁之间,NIHSS 评分为 4 至 20 分。

干预措施

患者被随机(1:1)分配接受静脉注射替罗非班或口服阿司匹林治疗 72 小时,采用中央、基于网络的计算机生成随机分组方案;所有患者随后均接受口服阿司匹林治疗。

主要结局

主要疗效结局为随机分组后 72 小时内的早期神经功能恶化(NIHSS 评分增加≥4 分)。主要安全性结局为随机分组后 72 小时内的症状性颅内出血。

结果

共纳入 425 例患者,分别接受静脉注射替罗非班(n=213)或口服阿司匹林(n=212)治疗。中位(IQR)年龄为 64.0 岁(56.0-71.0);124 例(29.2%)为女性,301 例(70.8%)为男性。替罗非班组有 9 例(4.2%)患者发生早期神经功能恶化,阿司匹林组有 28 例(13.2%)患者发生早期神经功能恶化(调整后的相对风险,0.32;95%CI,0.16-0.65;P=0.002)。替罗非班组无颅内出血病例。90 天随访时,替罗非班组有 3 例(1.3%)患者和阿司匹林组有 3 例(1.5%)患者死亡(调整后的 RR,1.15;95%CI,0.27-8.54;P=0.63),替罗非班组和阿司匹林组的中位(IQR)改良 Rankin 量表评分分别为 1.0(0-1.25)和 1.0(0-2)(调整后的优势比,1.28;95%CI,0.90-1.83;P=0.17)。

结论和相关性

在卒中发作后 24 小时内就诊的非心源性卒中患者中,替罗非班降低了早期神经功能恶化的风险,但并未增加症状性颅内出血或系统性出血的风险。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04491695。