Acad Med. 2024 Sep 1;99(9):987-996. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005744. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
Research suggests that burnout can begin early in medical school, yet burnout among preclerkship students remains underexplored. This study aimed to characterize burnout signs, sources, coping strategies, and potential interventions among preclerkship students at one U.S. medical school.
The authors conducted a qualitative study of preclerkship students at Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (MCASOM) in June 2019. Participants completed 2 Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) items (measuring frequency of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization) and 2 free-text questions on burnout before participating in 1 of 3 semistructured focus groups. Focus group questions were derived from a literature review on medical student burnout with input from the MCASOM Student Life and Wellness Committee. Group discussions were recorded, transcribed, coded inductively, and analyzed iteratively (along with free-text comments) using a general inductive approach from a constructivist perspective.
Eighteen of 111 eligible students (16%) participated, with 5/18 (28%) reporting weekly emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization on MBI items. Analysis of focus group transcripts showed that most students had experienced burnout symptoms during their first or second year, corresponding with school-related stressors and manifesting in cognitive-emotional, physical, and verbal-behavioral ways. Students identified systemic, institutional, and individual burnout drivers and discussed how these drivers interacted (e.g., high standards of excellence at the system level interacted with anxiety and maladaptive thinking at the individual level, creating pressure to always do more). Students used various coping strategies (e.g., self-care, peer support, reframing, and compartmentalization) but emphasized limitations of these strategies and recommended interventions directed toward systemic and institutional burnout drivers.
This study offers insights into burnout signs and sources among preclerkship medical students that can inform future large-scale studies. Results suggest that burnout emerges from dynamic interactions among systemic, institutional, and individual factors and may benefit from multipronged interventions.
研究表明,倦怠可能早在医学院就开始了,但预科学生的倦怠仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在描述美国一所医学院预科学生的倦怠迹象、来源、应对策略和潜在干预措施。
作者于 2019 年 6 月在梅奥诊所阿里克斯医学院(MCASOM)对预科学生进行了一项定性研究。参与者在参加 3 个半结构化焦点小组之一之前,完成了 2 项 Maslach 倦怠量表(MBI)项目(衡量情绪衰竭和去人性化的频率)和 2 项关于倦怠的自由文本问题。焦点小组的问题源自对医学生倦怠的文献综述,并得到了 MCASOM 学生生活和健康委员会的投入。使用从建构主义视角的一般归纳方法,对小组讨论记录、转录本、进行归纳编码,并进行迭代分析(以及自由文本评论)。
111 名符合条件的学生中有 18 名(16%)参加了研究,其中 5/18(28%)在 MBI 项目中每周报告情绪衰竭和/或去人性化。焦点小组转录本的分析表明,大多数学生在第一或第二年经历了倦怠症状,与学校相关的压力源相对应,并以认知-情感、身体和言语-行为的方式表现出来。学生确定了系统、机构和个人的倦怠驱动因素,并讨论了这些驱动因素如何相互作用(例如,系统层面的卓越高标准与个人层面的焦虑和适应不良思维相互作用,造成总是要做更多的压力)。学生使用了各种应对策略(例如,自我保健、同伴支持、重新构建和划分),但强调了这些策略的局限性,并建议针对系统和机构倦怠驱动因素的干预措施。
本研究提供了预科医学生倦怠迹象和来源的见解,可以为未来的大规模研究提供信息。结果表明,倦怠是由系统、机构和个人因素的动态相互作用产生的,可能受益于多管齐下的干预措施。