Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.
University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;42(19):2317-2326. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02110. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
The phase III RESILIENT trial compared second-line liposomal irinotecan with topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Patients with SCLC and progression on or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m every 2 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or IV topotecan (1.5 mg/m daily for 5 consecutive days, every 3 weeks in a 6-week cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).
Among 461 randomly assigned patients, 229 received liposomal irinotecan and 232 received topotecan. The median follow-up was 18.4 months. The median OS was 7.9 months with liposomal irinotecan versus 8.3 months with topotecan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.37]; = .31). The median PFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.0 months with liposomal irinotecan and 3.3 months with topotecan (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20]; nominal = .71); ORR per BICR was 44.1% (95% CI, 37.6 to 50.8) and 21.6% (16.4 to 27.4), respectively. Overall, 42.0% and 83.4% of patients receiving liposomal irinotecan and topotecan, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common grade ≥3 related TEAEs were diarrhea (13.7%), neutropenia (8.0%), and decreased neutrophil count (4.4%) with liposomal irinotecan and neutropenia (51.6%), anemia (30.9%), and leukopenia (29.1%) with topotecan.
Liposomal irinotecan and topotecan demonstrated similar median OS and PFS in patients with relapsed SCLC. Although the primary end point of OS was not met, liposomal irinotecan demonstrated a higher ORR than topotecan. The safety profile of liposomal irinotecan was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety concerns emerged.
III 期 RESILIENT 试验比较了二线伊立替康脂质体与拓扑替康在小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者中的疗效。
SCLC 患者在一线含铂化疗后进展,按 1:1 比例随机分配(每 2 周静脉注射[IV]伊立替康脂质体[70 mg/m2,每 6 周周期]或 IV 拓扑替康[1.5 mg/m2,每日连续 5 天,每 3 周一个 6 周周期])。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。关键次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。
在 461 例随机分配的患者中,229 例接受伊立替康脂质体治疗,232 例接受拓扑替康治疗。中位随访时间为 18.4 个月。伊立替康脂质体组的中位 OS 为 7.9 个月,拓扑替康组为 8.3 个月(风险比[HR],1.11[95%CI,0.90 至 1.37];=.31)。伊立替康脂质体组经盲法独立中心审查(BICR)评估的中位 PFS 为 4.0 个月,拓扑替康组为 3.3 个月(HR,0.96[95%CI,0.77 至 1.20];名义值=.71);BICR 评估的 ORR 分别为 44.1%(95%CI,37.6 至 50.8)和 21.6%(16.4 至 27.4)。分别有 42.0%和 83.4%接受伊立替康脂质体和拓扑替康治疗的患者发生≥3 级与治疗相关的不良事件(TEAEs)。最常见的≥3 级与 TEAEs 是腹泻(13.7%)、中性粒细胞减少(8.0%)和中性粒细胞计数减少(4.4%)(与伊立替康脂质体相关),中性粒细胞减少(51.6%)、贫血(30.9%)和白细胞减少(29.1%)(与拓扑替康相关)。
在复发性 SCLC 患者中,伊立替康脂质体和拓扑替康的中位 OS 和 PFS 相似。尽管 OS 主要终点未达到,但伊立替康脂质体的 ORR 高于拓扑替康。伊立替康脂质体的安全性与已知安全性一致;未出现新的安全性问题。