Suppr超能文献

免疫检查点抑制剂联合安罗替尼作为广泛期小细胞肺癌二线或后续治疗的临床疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究

Clinical efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Wu Yanan, Zhang Yan, Tian Yuanjing, Lv Yajuan, Zhang Jiandong

机构信息

Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Lung Cancer Institute, Jinan, China.

Department of Oncology, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Mar;27(3):1026-1038. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03654-7. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatments are limited for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients in secondline or subsequent setting. This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy in ES-SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients with ES-SCLC at Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital between January 2019 and March 2024. According to the different therapy regimes, they were divided into three groups, ICI plus anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy group (ICI + anlotinib group), single ICI as secondline or subsequent therapy group (single ICI therapy group), single chemotherapy as secondline therapy group (single chemotherapy group). Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival time (OS) among these three groups. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze different factors which correlated to PFS and OS. The adverse events were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in ICI + anlotinib group had a longer PFS and OS compared to patients in single ICI therapy group (median PFS [mPFS]: 6.7 months vs. 4.6 months, P = 0.007; median OS [mOS]:12.4 months vs. 8.4 months, P = 0.041) and single chemotherapy group (mPFS: 6.7 months vs. 3.0 months, P < 0.001; mOS: 12.4 months vs. 7.2 months, P = 0.002). The Cox regression analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), liver metastasis, brain metastasis and treatment regimes were independent predictors that affecting the PFS and OS of all the enrolled patients. The common adverse events (AEs) were wleukopenia and fatigue. There was no significant statistical difference in other AEs among the three groups except for leukopenia.

CONCLUSION

ICI + anlotinib as secondline or subsequent therapy has better efficacy than single ICI group and single chemotherapy group and with tolerable toxicities for patients with ES-SCLC.

摘要

背景

广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者在二线及后续治疗中的选择有限。本研究旨在探讨免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合安罗替尼作为ES-SCLC二线或后续治疗的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2024年3月在山东省千佛山医院就诊的116例ES-SCLC患者。根据不同治疗方案,将患者分为三组,ICI联合安罗替尼作为二线或后续治疗组(ICI+安罗替尼组)、单药ICI作为二线或后续治疗组(单药ICI治疗组)、单药化疗作为二线治疗组(单药化疗组)。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较三组患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用Cox回归分析影响PFS和OS的不同因素。根据《不良事件通用术语标准》第5.0版评估不良事件。

结果

Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与单药ICI治疗组相比,ICI+安罗替尼组患者的PFS和OS更长(中位PFS[mPFS]:6.7个月对4.6个月,P=0.007;中位OS[mOS]:12.4个月对8.4个月,P=0.041),与单药化疗组相比,PFS和OS也更长(mPFS:6.7个月对3.0个月,P<0.001;mOS:12.4个月对7.2个月,P=0.002)。Cox回归分析显示,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)、肝转移、脑转移和治疗方案是影响所有入组患者PFS和OS的独立预测因素。常见不良事件(AE)为白细胞减少和疲劳。除白细胞减少外,三组患者的其他AE无显著统计学差异。

结论

ICI联合安罗替尼作为二线或后续治疗方案对ES-SCLC患者的疗效优于单药ICI组和单药化疗组,且毒性可耐受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验