Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194223, Russia.
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2024 Mar;89(3):507-522. doi: 10.1134/S0006297924030106.
Some tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), including amitriptyline (ATL), clomipramine (CLO), and desipramine (DES), are known to be effective for management of neuropathic pain. It was previously determined that ATL, CLO, and DES are capable of voltage-dependent blocking of NMDA receptors of glutamate (NMDAR), which play a key role in pathogenesis of neuropathic pain. Despite the similar structure of ATL, CLO, and DES, efficacy of their interaction with NMDAR varies significantly. In the study presented here, we applied molecular modeling methods to investigate the mechanism of binding of ATL, CLO, and DES to NMDAR and to identify structural features of the drugs that determine their inhibitory activity against NMDAR. Molecular docking of the studied TCAs into the NMDAR channel was performed. Conformational behavior of the obtained complexes in the lipid bilayer was simulated by the method of molecular dynamics (MD). A single binding site (upper) for the tertiary amines ATL and CLO and two binding sites (upper and lower) for the secondary amine DES were identified inside the NMDAR channel. The upper and lower binding sites are located along the channel axis at different distances from the extracellular side of the plasma membrane. MD simulation revealed that the position of DES in the lower site is stabilized only in the presence of sodium cation inside the NMDAR channel. DES binds more strongly to NMDAR compared to ATL and CLO due to simultaneous interaction of two hydrogen atoms of its cationic group with the asparagine residues of the ion pore of the receptor. This feature may be responsible for the stronger side effects of DES. It has been hypothesized that ATL binds to NMDAR less efficiently compared to DES and CLO due to its lower conformational mobility. The identified features of the structure- and cation-dependent mechanism of interaction between TCAs and NMDAR will help in the further development of effective and safe analgesic therapy.
一些三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs),包括阿米替林(ATL)、氯米帕明(CLO)和去甲替林(DES),已被证明对治疗神经性疼痛有效。先前已经确定,ATL、CLO 和 DES 能够对谷氨酸(NMDA)受体的电压依赖性阻断,NMDA 受体在神经性疼痛的发病机制中起关键作用。尽管 ATL、CLO 和 DES 的结构相似,但它们与 NMDAR 相互作用的效果却有很大差异。在本研究中,我们应用分子建模方法研究了 ATL、CLO 和 DES 与 NMDAR 的结合机制,并确定了决定药物对 NMDAR 抑制活性的结构特征。将研究中的 TCAs 进行分子对接,进入 NMDAR 通道。通过分子动力学(MD)方法模拟获得的复合物在脂质双层中的构象行为。在 NMDAR 通道内确定了 ATL 和 CLO 的三级胺的单个结合位点(上部)和 DES 的二级胺的两个结合位点(上部和下部)。上部和下部结合位点沿通道轴位于距质膜外表面不同距离处。MD 模拟表明,只有在 NMDAR 通道内存在钠离子的情况下,DES 才能稳定地位于下部结合位点。DES 与 NMDAR 的结合比 ATL 和 CLO 更强,这是由于其阳离子基团的两个氢原子与受体离子通道的天冬酰胺残基同时相互作用。这一特征可能是 DES 副作用更强的原因。据推测,与 DES 和 CLO 相比,ATL 与 NMDAR 的结合效率较低,这是由于其构象迁移率较低。TCAs 与 NMDAR 之间的结构和阳离子依赖性相互作用机制的特征确定,将有助于进一步开发有效和安全的镇痛治疗方法。