German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Patient-reported Outcomes & Health Economics Research, Greifswald, Germany.
Deakin University, Faculty of Health, Department School of Health and Social Development, Melbourne, Australia.
Value Health. 2024 Aug;27(8):1092-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
To quantify health fluctuations, identify affected health-related quality of life (HRQoL) dimensions, and evaluate if fluctuations affect the HRQoL instruments recall period adherence in people living with dementia (PlwD).
Caregivers of PlwD completed a daily diary for 14 days, documenting if PlwD's health was better or worse than the day before and the affected HRQoL dimensions. Health fluctuation was categorized into low (0-4 fluctuations in 14 days), moderate (5-8), and high (9-14). Also, caregivers and PlwD completed the EQ-5D-5L (proxy- and self-reported) on days 1, 7, and 14. Subsequently, caregivers were interviewed to determine whether recurrent fluctuations were considered in the EQ-5D-5L assessment of today's health (recall period adherence).
Fluctuations were reported for 96% of PlwD, on average, for 7 of the 14 days. Dimensions most frequently triggering fluctuations included memory, mobility, concentration, sleep, pain, and usual activities. Fluctuations were associated with higher EQ-5D-5L health-states variation and nonadherence to the EQ-5D-5L recall period "today." PlwD with moderate to high fluctuation had the highest EQ-5D-5L utility change between day 1 and 14 (0.157 and 0.134) and recall period nonadherence (31% and 26%) compared with PlwD with low fluctuation (0.010; 17%). Recall period nonadherence was higher in PlwD with improved compared with those with deteriorated health in the diary (37% vs 9%).
Health fluctuations frequently occur in dementia and strongly affect HRQoL assessments. Further research is needed to evaluate if more extended recall periods and multiple, consecutive assessments could capture health fluctuations more appropriately in dementia.
量化健康波动,确定受影响的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)维度,并评估波动是否会影响痴呆患者(PlwD)的 HRQoL 工具回忆期的依从性。
PlwD 的护理人员完成了为期 14 天的日常日记,记录 PlwD 的健康状况是否比前一天好或差,以及受影响的 HRQoL 维度。健康波动分为低(14 天内波动 0-4 次)、中(5-8 次)和高(9-14 次)。此外,护理人员和 PlwD 在第 1、7 和 14 天完成了 EQ-5D-5L(代理和自我报告)。随后,对护理人员进行了访谈,以确定今天的健康评估(回忆期依从性)是否考虑到反复波动。
报告了 96%的 PlwD 存在波动,平均在 14 天中有 7 天存在波动。触发波动最频繁的维度包括记忆、移动、注意力、睡眠、疼痛和日常活动。波动与 EQ-5D-5L 健康状况变化较大和回忆期“今天”不依从相关。与低波动相比,中至高波动的 PlwD 在第 1 天和第 14 天之间的 EQ-5D-5L 效用变化最大(0.157 和 0.134)和回忆期不依从率最高(31%和 26%),而低波动的 PlwD 为 0.010(17%)。日记中健康状况改善的 PlwD 比健康状况恶化的 PlwD 回忆期不依从率更高(37% vs 9%)。
痴呆患者经常出现健康波动,强烈影响 HRQoL 评估。需要进一步研究以评估是否更长的回忆期和多次连续评估可以更恰当地捕捉痴呆患者的健康波动。