School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Health Economics Group, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2693-2704. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03737-6. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
This study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L in informal caregivers of people with dementia.
Data were obtained from an online survey administered to informal caregivers of people with dementia in Australia. Known-group comparisons were examined by formulating 15 a priori hypotheses, where a difference was made between weak and strong hypotheses. Group comparisons were tested using the non-parametric Wilcoxon-rank and the Kruskal-Wallis test, as well as regression analysis. Floor and ceiling effects were considered to be present if more than 15% of respondents achieved the lowest or highest possible score, respectively.
In total, 212 informal caregivers of people with dementia were included in the analysis. On average, participants were 47 years old (SD: 17) and 61% of them were female. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was 0.88 (SD: 0.16) and the mean EQ-VAS was 72.47 (SD: 17.86). While there was no floor effect, 26% reported full health. Nine strong and three weak hypotheses were confirmed, supporting the ability of the EQ-5D-5L to discriminate between groups with respect to: self-reported health status, happiness levels, presence of mental or physical health conditions, ability to engage in enjoyable activities, and availability of support.
Findings provide supporting evidence for the EQ-5D-5L in terms of its discriminant validity in informal caregivers of patients with dementia. However, the present ceiling effect suggests that the sensitivity of the EQ-5D-5L to detect improvements may be limited. Further studies are warranted examining other psychometric criteria, including reliability and responsiveness to change.
本研究旨在检验 EQ-5D-5L 在痴呆症患者非专业照护者中的心理测量性能。
数据来自澳大利亚对痴呆症患者非专业照护者进行的在线调查。通过制定 15 个先验假设来进行已知群体比较,其中对弱假设和强假设进行了区分。使用非参数 Wilcoxon-rank 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验以及回归分析来检验组间比较。如果超过 15%的受访者分别达到最低或最高可能得分,则认为存在地板效应和天花板效应。
共有 212 名痴呆症患者非专业照护者参与了分析。参与者的平均年龄为 47 岁(标准差:17),其中 61%为女性。EQ-5D-5L 效用评分的平均值为 0.88(标准差:0.16),EQ-VAS 的平均值为 72.47(标准差:17.86)。虽然没有地板效应,但 26%的人报告完全健康。有 9 个强假设和 3 个弱假设得到了证实,这支持了 EQ-5D-5L 在以下方面区分不同群体的能力:自我报告的健康状况、幸福感水平、是否存在心理健康或身体状况、参与愉快活动的能力以及获得支持的情况。
这些发现为 EQ-5D-5L 在痴呆症患者非专业照护者中的区分效度提供了支持性证据。然而,目前的天花板效应表明,EQ-5D-5L 检测改善的敏感性可能有限。需要进一步研究,以检验其他心理测量标准,包括可靠性和对变化的反应性。