Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Pain Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Turk Neurosurg. 2024;34(3):480-484. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.43946-23.4.
To compare the procedural features of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) performed using two different needles (Stimuplex® and Quincke) in terms of procedure time, exposed radiation dose and adverse effects and complications, thus providing preliminary data to aid needle selection for TFESI.
Patients who received fluoroscopy-guided single-level lumbosacral TFESI between September 2020 and September 2021 were retrospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups with respect to the needle type used for the procedure ? those treated with a Quincke needle were classified as Group Q and those treated with a Stimuplex® needle comprised Group S. Subsequently, the two groups were compared in terms of their demographic data, procedure time, radiation dose, amount of contrast use, first-hour numeric rating scale (NRS), intravascular flow and complication rates.
The number of patients recruited for Groups Q and S was 65 and 61, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding their demographic data, preprocedural NRS scores, procedure time, exposed radiation dose and the amount of contrast dye used. Notably, the first-hour NRS scores were found to be significantly lower in Group S (p=0.040) after the procedure. Moreover, the intravascular contrast spread was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05) ? it was encountered during four procedures in Group Q, but was altogether absent in Group S.
The Stimuplex® needle may decrease the possibility of inadvertent intravascular leakages during TFESI and may also improve immediate pain scores after the procedure.
比较两种不同针(Stimuplex® 和 Quincke)在经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)中的程序特征,包括手术时间、暴露辐射剂量和不良反应及并发症,从而为 TFESI 的针选择提供初步数据。
回顾性纳入 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月间接受透视引导下单节段腰骶 TFESI 的患者。根据用于该程序的针类型将患者分为两组 - 使用 Quincke 针治疗的患者分为 Q 组,而使用 Stimuplex® 针治疗的患者分为 S 组。然后,比较两组的人口统计学数据、手术时间、辐射剂量、对比剂使用量、第一小时数字评分量表(NRS)、血管内流动和并发症发生率。
Q 组和 S 组分别纳入 65 例和 61 例患者。两组在人口统计学数据、术前 NRS 评分、手术时间、暴露辐射剂量和使用的对比剂量方面无显著差异。值得注意的是,手术后 S 组的第一小时 NRS 评分显著降低(p=0.040)。此外,两组之间的血管内对比剂扩散存在显著差异(p < 0.05) - Q 组有 4 例发生,而 S 组则无。
Stimuplex® 针可能降低 TFESI 过程中意外血管内渗漏的可能性,并可能改善术后即刻疼痛评分。