• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周神经刺激器与 Quincke 针在腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射中的应用比较。

Comparison of the Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator and Quincke Needle for Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.

机构信息

Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Pain Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk Neurosurg. 2024;34(3):480-484. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.43946-23.4.

DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.43946-23.4
PMID:38650563
Abstract

AIM

To compare the procedural features of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) performed using two different needles (Stimuplex® and Quincke) in terms of procedure time, exposed radiation dose and adverse effects and complications, thus providing preliminary data to aid needle selection for TFESI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who received fluoroscopy-guided single-level lumbosacral TFESI between September 2020 and September 2021 were retrospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups with respect to the needle type used for the procedure ? those treated with a Quincke needle were classified as Group Q and those treated with a Stimuplex® needle comprised Group S. Subsequently, the two groups were compared in terms of their demographic data, procedure time, radiation dose, amount of contrast use, first-hour numeric rating scale (NRS), intravascular flow and complication rates.

RESULTS

The number of patients recruited for Groups Q and S was 65 and 61, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding their demographic data, preprocedural NRS scores, procedure time, exposed radiation dose and the amount of contrast dye used. Notably, the first-hour NRS scores were found to be significantly lower in Group S (p=0.040) after the procedure. Moreover, the intravascular contrast spread was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05) ? it was encountered during four procedures in Group Q, but was altogether absent in Group S.

CONCLUSION

The Stimuplex® needle may decrease the possibility of inadvertent intravascular leakages during TFESI and may also improve immediate pain scores after the procedure.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同针(Stimuplex® 和 Quincke)在经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)中的程序特征,包括手术时间、暴露辐射剂量和不良反应及并发症,从而为 TFESI 的针选择提供初步数据。

材料和方法

回顾性纳入 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月间接受透视引导下单节段腰骶 TFESI 的患者。根据用于该程序的针类型将患者分为两组 - 使用 Quincke 针治疗的患者分为 Q 组,而使用 Stimuplex® 针治疗的患者分为 S 组。然后,比较两组的人口统计学数据、手术时间、辐射剂量、对比剂使用量、第一小时数字评分量表(NRS)、血管内流动和并发症发生率。

结果

Q 组和 S 组分别纳入 65 例和 61 例患者。两组在人口统计学数据、术前 NRS 评分、手术时间、暴露辐射剂量和使用的对比剂量方面无显著差异。值得注意的是,手术后 S 组的第一小时 NRS 评分显著降低(p=0.040)。此外,两组之间的血管内对比剂扩散存在显著差异(p < 0.05) - Q 组有 4 例发生,而 S 组则无。

结论

Stimuplex® 针可能降低 TFESI 过程中意外血管内渗漏的可能性,并可能改善术后即刻疼痛评分。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulator and Quincke Needle for Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.外周神经刺激器与 Quincke 针在腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射中的应用比较。
Turk Neurosurg. 2024;34(3):480-484. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.43946-23.4.
2
Whitacre Needle Reduces the Incidence of Intravascular Uptake in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.惠特克针降低了腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射时血管内摄取的发生率。
Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):325-31.
3
A comparison of Quincke and Whitacre needles with respect to risk of intravascular uptake in S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a randomized trial of 1376 cases.经 S1 椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的 Quincke 与 Whitacre 针比较:一项 1376 例的随机试验研究血管内摄取风险。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Nov;117(5):1241-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a6d1bd.
4
Differential rates of intravascular uptake and pain perception during lumbosacral epidural injection among adults using a 22-gauge needle versus 25-gauge needle: a randomized clinical trial.成人使用 22 号和 25 号针头行腰骶部硬膜外注射时血管内摄取率和疼痛感知的差异:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01137-0.
5
Adverse events associated with fluoroscopically guided lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections.与荧光镜引导下腰骶部经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射相关的不良事件。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.05.034. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
6
Comparison of Touhy and Quincke needles on intravascular injection rate in lumbar transforaminal epidural block: a randomized prospective trial.经皮椎间孔腰椎硬膜外阻滞中 Touhy 与 Quincke 针注射速度比较:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;46(8):694-698. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102504. Epub 2021 May 26.
7
Comparison of Caudal Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome After Single-level Discectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.经单节段椎间盘切除术治疗后腰椎术后综合征中经尾侧与经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的比较:一项前瞻性、随机试验。
Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):161-169.
8
Differential Rates of Inadvertent Intravascular Injection during Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections Using Blunt-Tip, Pencil-Point, and Catheter-Extension Needles.使用钝头、笔尖式和导管延长针进行腰椎椎间孔硬膜外注射时无意血管内注射的差异率
Pain Med. 2015 Nov;16(11):2084-9. doi: 10.1111/pme.12861. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
9
Intravascular flow detection during transforaminal epidural injections: a prospective assessment.经椎间孔硬膜外注射期间的血管内血流检测:一项前瞻性评估。
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):21-7.
10
Digital subtraction angiography does not reliably prevent paraplegia associated with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.数字减影血管造影并不能可靠地预防腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射相关的截瘫。
Pain Physician. 2012 Nov-Dec;15(6):515-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the Editor: Comparison of efficacy between transforaminal epidural steroid injection technique without contrast versus with contrast in lumbar radiculopathy: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.致编辑的信:腰椎神经根病中无造影剂与有造影剂的经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射技术疗效比较:一项前瞻性纵向队列研究
Asian Spine J. 2024 Jun;18(3):483-484. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0177.r1. Epub 2024 Jun 26.