• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在苏格兰活动性中轴型脊柱关节炎患者中,比美吉珠单抗与白细胞介素-17A抑制剂治疗途径的成本效益。

The cost-effectiveness of a bimekizumab versus IL-17A inhibitors treatment-pathway in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis in Scotland.

作者信息

Mørup Michael F, Taieb Vanessa, Willems Damon, Rose Micah, Lyris Nikos, Lamotte Mark, Gerlier Laetitia, Thom Howard

机构信息

UCB Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark.

UCB Pharma, Colombes, France.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):682-696. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2342209. Epub 2024 May 2.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2342209
PMID:38650583
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a treatment-pathway initiated with bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F and IL-17A, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) compared with IL-17Ai's, ixekizumab, and secukinumab, from the NHS Scotland perspective.

METHODS

The axSpA treatment-pathway was modeled using a decision tree followed by a lifetime Markov model. The pathway included first- and second-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD), followed by best supportive care (bDMARD, nonbiologic). Bimekizumab followed by any bDMARD ("BKZ") was compared with IL-17Ai's: secukinumab 150 mg followed by a blend ("SEC") of dose up-titration to secukinumab 300 mg and any bDMARD, or ixekizumab followed by any bDMARD ("IXE"). Transition to the next therapy was triggered by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index-50% (BASDAI50) non-response or any-cause discontinuation. A published network meta-analysis provided efficacy data. EuroQoL-5-dimensions utilities were derived by mapping from Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score. Costs included disease management (linked to functional limitations), biologics acquisition (list prices), administration and monitoring (NHS 2021/22). Discounting was 3.5%/year. Probabilistic results from patients with non-radiographic axSpA and ankylosing spondylitis were averaged to reflect the axSpA disease spectrum. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of BKZ was £24,801/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) vs. SEC (95% credible interval £24,163-£25,895). BKZ had similar costs (Δ -£385 [-£15,239-£14,468]) and QALYs (Δ 0.039 [-0.748-0.825]) to IXE, with £1,523 (£862-£2,222) net monetary benefit. Conclusions remained unchanged in most scenarios. Results' drivers included BASDAI50 response rate and disease management cost.

LIMITATIONS

Results were based on list prices. Data concerning up-titration to secukinumab 300 mg was scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

The bimekizumab treatment-pathway represents a cost-effective option across the axSpA disease spectrum in Scotland. Bimekizumab is cost-effective compared to a secukinumab-pathway that includes dose up-titration, and has similar costs and QALYs to an ixekizumab-pathway.

摘要

目的

从苏格兰国民保健服务体系(NHS Scotland)的角度,评估与白细胞介素17A抑制剂(IL-17Ai's)司库奇尤单抗和依奇珠单抗相比,在中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者中起始使用比美吉珠单抗(一种选择性抑制白细胞介素(IL)-17F和IL-17A的单克隆IgG1抗体)的治疗路径的成本效益。

方法

使用决策树模型,随后是终生马尔可夫模型对axSpA治疗路径进行建模。该路径包括一线和二线生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARD),随后是最佳支持治疗(bDMARD,非生物制剂)。将比美吉珠单抗序贯任何bDMARD(“BKZ”)与IL-17Ai's进行比较:150mg司库奇尤单抗序贯剂量递增至300mg司库奇尤单抗及任何bDMARD的联合治疗(“SEC”),或依奇珠单抗序贯任何bDMARD(“IXE”)。向下一治疗的转换由巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数-50%(BASDAI50)无反应或任何原因停药触发。一项已发表的网状荟萃分析提供了疗效数据。通过将强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分进行映射得出欧洲五维健康量表效用值。成本包括疾病管理(与功能受限相关)、生物制剂采购(标价)、给药和监测(NHS 2021/22)。贴现率为每年3.5%。对非放射学axSpA和强直性脊柱炎患者的概率结果进行平均,以反映axSpA疾病谱。进行了情景分析和敏感性分析。

结果

BKZ的增量成本效益比(ICER)为24,801英镑/质量调整生命年(QALY),而SEC为(95%可信区间24,163-25,895英镑)。BKZ与IXE的成本相似(差异-385英镑[-15,239-14,468英镑]),QALY也相似(差异0.039[-0.748-0.825]),净货币效益为1,523英镑(862-2,222英镑)。在大多数情景下结论不变。结果的驱动因素包括BASDAI50反应率和疾病管理成本。

局限性

结果基于标价。关于司库奇尤单抗剂量递增至300mg的数据稀缺。

结论

在苏格兰,比美吉珠单抗治疗路径代表了整个axSpA疾病谱的一种具有成本效益的选择。与包括剂量递增的司库奇尤单抗治疗路径相比,比美吉珠单抗具有成本效益,并且与依奇珠单抗治疗路径具有相似的成本和QALY。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of a bimekizumab versus IL-17A inhibitors treatment-pathway in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis in Scotland.在苏格兰活动性中轴型脊柱关节炎患者中,比美吉珠单抗与白细胞介素-17A抑制剂治疗途径的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):682-696. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2342209. Epub 2024 May 2.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bimekizumab for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis in Sweden.在瑞典,用于治疗活动性银屑病关节炎的比美吉珠单抗的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1190-1200. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2259609. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.比较比美克单抗在中轴型脊柱关节炎中的疗效和安全性:系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 May 2;63(5):1195-1205. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead598.
4
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the 52-Week Efficacy of Bimekizumab Versus Secukinumab and Ixekizumab for the Treatment of Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.对比昔美克珠单抗与司库奇尤单抗及依奇珠单抗治疗放射学中轴型脊柱关节炎52周疗效的匹配调整间接比较
Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Aug;11(4):1023-1041. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00684-z. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies with Biologics in Accordance with Treatment Guidelines for Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Patient-Level Model.依强直性脊柱炎治疗指南使用生物制剂的治疗策略的成本效益:患者水平模型
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1219-1231. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1219.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Secukinumab Versus Other Biologics in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: An Argentinean Perspective.司库奇尤单抗与其他生物制剂治疗银屑病关节炎的成本效益:阿根廷视角
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Dec;20:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential biologic therapy with ixekizumab versus secukinumab as first-line treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the UK.在英国,以司库奇尤单抗为对照,优时比单抗序贯生物治疗作为中重度银屑病一线治疗的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2018 Aug;21(8):810-820. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1474747. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
8
Targeted therapies and conventional care for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the network-meta analysis.中国强直性脊柱炎的靶向治疗与常规治疗:基于网络荟萃分析的成本效果分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 18;19(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04973-9.
9
Bimekizumab treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety from the randomised parallel phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and BE MOBILE 2 studies.比美吉珠单抗治疗活动性中轴型脊柱关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:随机平行 3 期 BE MOBILE 1 和 BE MOBILE 2 研究的 52 周结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):199-213. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224803.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis from the Canadian perspective.从加拿大角度评估司库奇尤单抗治疗强直性脊柱炎的成本效果。
J Med Econ. 2019 Jan;22(1):45-52. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1539400. Epub 2018 Nov 13.