Justifying the need for a recovery related surveillance system: Exploratory focused interviews.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

No recovery related surveillance system exists but given the evidence of effectiveness and growing supply, a house- and resident- level recovery house (RH) surveillance system could be beneficial for data collection on recovery support service (RSS) engagement, and retention; for improved standardization of RH programs and services; and for identification of outcomes associated with long-term recovery.

METHODS

This study aimed to explore current data collection practices at the resident- and house- level through qualitative focus interviews of RH representatives. The 13 RH interviews were scheduled with 16 RH representative respondents.

RESULTS

The most frequently collected resident data was at entry (92%) and departure (85%) and included demographics ( = 5), substance use history ( = 6), treatment and recovery history ( = 5), legal and correctional history ( = 6) and mental health information ( = 7). Recovery support data was collected by 85% of houses. Post-stay data was only collected by four RHs (31%).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that there is a lack of standardized systematic collection, analysis, and reporting of recovery related data in the RH field. A recovery related surveillance system has the potential to fill this gap and inform and improve standard of resident care to support long-term recovery from substance use disorder.