• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论证与恢复相关的监测系统的必要性:探索性聚焦访谈。

Justifying the need for a recovery related surveillance system: Exploratory focused interviews.

作者信息

Ellis Joseph, Clancy Grace L, Kizewski Amber, Jennings Tyler, Thompson Robin A, Arnett Paula, Bunn Terry L

机构信息

Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center University of Kentucky College of Public Health Lexington Kentucky USA.

Fletcher Group, Inc. London Kentucky USA.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 21;7(4):e2038. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2038. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.2038
PMID:38650732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11033341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

No recovery related surveillance system exists but given the evidence of effectiveness and growing supply, a house- and resident- level recovery house (RH) surveillance system could be beneficial for data collection on recovery support service (RSS) engagement, and retention; for improved standardization of RH programs and services; and for identification of outcomes associated with long-term recovery.

METHODS

This study aimed to explore current data collection practices at the resident- and house- level through qualitative focus interviews of RH representatives. The 13 RH interviews were scheduled with 16 RH representative respondents.

RESULTS

The most frequently collected resident data was at entry (92%) and departure (85%) and included demographics ( = 5), substance use history ( = 6), treatment and recovery history ( = 5), legal and correctional history ( = 6) and mental health information ( = 7). Recovery support data was collected by 85% of houses. Post-stay data was only collected by four RHs (31%).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that there is a lack of standardized systematic collection, analysis, and reporting of recovery related data in the RH field. A recovery related surveillance system has the potential to fill this gap and inform and improve standard of resident care to support long-term recovery from substance use disorder.

摘要

背景与目的

目前不存在与康复相关的监测系统,但鉴于康复支持服务(RSS)有效性的证据以及供应的不断增加,一个针对房屋和居民层面的康复之家(RH)监测系统可能有利于收集康复支持服务参与情况和留存率的数据;有利于提高康复之家项目和服务的标准化程度;有利于识别与长期康复相关的结果。

方法

本研究旨在通过对康复之家代表进行定性焦点访谈,探索居民和房屋层面当前的数据收集做法。安排了13次对康复之家的访谈,有16名康复之家代表受访者参与。

结果

最常收集的居民数据是入住时(92%)和离开时(85%)的数据,包括人口统计学信息(n = 5)、物质使用史(n = 6)、治疗和康复史(n = 5)、法律和惩教史(n = 6)以及心理健康信息(n = 7)。85%的康复之家收集了康复支持数据。只有4个康复之家(31%)收集了入住后的数据。

结论

这些结果表明,康复之家领域缺乏对与康复相关数据的标准化系统收集、分析和报告。一个与康复相关的监测系统有可能填补这一空白,并为居民护理标准提供信息并加以改进,以支持从物质使用障碍中实现长期康复。

相似文献

1
Justifying the need for a recovery related surveillance system: Exploratory focused interviews.论证与恢复相关的监测系统的必要性:探索性聚焦访谈。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 21;7(4):e2038. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2038. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
3
State-Level Support for Recovery Housing: Results from a National Collaborative Study of U.S. Single State Agencies.国家级对康复住房的支持:来自美国单一州机构全国合作研究的结果。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2024 Nov-Dec;56(5):699-707. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2023.2253811. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
4
Assessing a pilot scheme of intensive support and assertive linkage in levels of engagement, retention, and recovery capital for people in recovery housing using quasi-experimental methods.使用准实验方法评估强化支持和果断联系试点计划,以评估康复住房中康复人员的参与度、保留率和恢复资本水平。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Mar;158:209283. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209283. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
5
6
Sober living house characteristics: A multilevel analyses of factors associated with improved outcomes. sober living house 特征:与改善结果相关因素的多层次分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Mar;98:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
7
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
8
Abstinence-contingent recovery housing and reinforcement-based treatment following opioid detoxification.阿片类物质脱毒后基于禁欲和强化的康复住所治疗。
Addiction. 2012 May;107(5):973-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03750.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
9
Impact of interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital admission on quality-of-life following discharge: linked-evidence synthesis.干预措施对改善计划住院的老年患者出院后生活质量的影响:综合证据分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;11(23):1-164. doi: 10.3310/GHTY5117.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying the availability of recovery housing in the U.S.: The NSTARR project.识别美国康复住房的供应情况:NSTARR 项目。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Jan 1;230:109188. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109188. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
2
Medication assisted therapy and recovery homes.药物辅助治疗和康复之家。
J Prev Interv Community. 2022 Apr-Jun;50(2):178-190. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2021.1934940. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Mutual Help Group Participation for Substance Use Problems.种族/民族差异在物质使用问题互助小组参与方面的体现。
Alcohol Res. 2021 Mar 11;41(1):03. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v41.1.03. eCollection 2021.
4
Estimating the Number of Substance Use Disorder Recovery Homes in the United States.估算美国物质使用障碍康复之家的数量。
Alcohol Treat Q. 2020;38(4):506-514. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2020.1760756. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
An Exploratory Study of the Acceptability and Feasibility of Yoga Among Women in Substance Use Disorder Recovery.一项关于女性物质使用障碍康复者中瑜伽可接受性和可行性的探索性研究。
J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):273-281. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0351. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
7
Sober living house characteristics: A multilevel analyses of factors associated with improved outcomes. sober living house 特征:与改善结果相关因素的多层次分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Mar;98:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Eighteen Month Outcomes for Clients Receiving Combined Outpatient Treatment and Sober Living Houses.接受门诊综合治疗和清醒生活之家服务的客户的18个月治疗结果。
J Subst Use. 2010 Jan 1;15(5):352-366. doi: 10.3109/14659890903531279.
9
Communal housing settings enhance substance abuse recovery.群居式住房环境有助于药物滥用康复。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Oct;96(10):1727-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.070839.